• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Peanut Gallery: The Immaculate conception of Mary!

Status
Not open for further replies.

katholikos

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
3,631
439
United States
✟6,027.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Your church is not consonant with scripture or the writings of early ecclesiastics. The idea that Peter was the first pope is a house-of-straw that collapses upon first inspection.

The Catholic Church is perfectly consonant with scripture and the writings of early ecclesiastics. The idea that Peter was the first pope is confirmed by scripture and early christian testimony


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PRjhRRgzDo&NR=1
 
Upvote 0
M

MamaZ

Guest
  • Like
Reactions: Nilloc
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Funny to me that Peter never mentioned that he was anything other than a fellow elder.
Not only that, Peter was a slow runner :D

John 20:4 Raced yet the two alike and the Other Disciple torwards-runs more swiftly of-the/than Peter and came first into the tomb.

Textus Rec.) John 20:4 etrecon de oi duo omou kai o alloV maqhthV proedramen tacion tou petrou kai hlqen prwtoV eiV to mnhmeion

Interesting thread here on the GA board :cool:

http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=7280823
If Jesus is YHWH, Jehovah of the OT, who are the 2 "lords" of Psa 110:1?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

katholikos

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
3,631
439
United States
✟6,027.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
And any one that properly understands "On this rock I will build my Church" Knows that St. Peter is the 1st Pope.

Peace

But that is logical. There is no place for logic in CF. Haven't you heard?
 
Upvote 0

Uphill Battle

Well-Known Member
Apr 25, 2005
18,279
1,221
48
✟23,416.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
hardly. The first mention of a Pope comes centuries later. Then, you cobble together the "well, that means every guy before him was a pope too." Scriptural record of Peter doesn't describe someone who believed they had authority over all the church.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nilloc
Upvote 0

lionroar0

Coffee drinker
Jul 10, 2004
9,362
705
54
✟35,401.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
hardly. The first mention of a Pope comes centuries later. Then, you cobble together the "well, that means every guy before him was a pope too." Scriptural record of Peter doesn't describe someone who believed they had authority over all the church.

As I posted earlier with the proper understanding....:p

Peace
 
Upvote 0

katholikos

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
3,631
439
United States
✟6,027.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
hardly. The first mention of a Pope comes centuries later. Then, you cobble together the "well, that means every guy before him was a pope too." Scriptural record of Peter doesn't describe someone who believed they had authority over all the church.
You apparently don't know what a "pope" is. The English word pope is a poor translation, from Latin: "papa" or "father", and from Greek πάπας ," pápas". It refers to the Bishop of Rome. We call priests and bishops father (see here: LINK ). Who came up with the word "pope", I have no idea. But he is the "Bishop of Rome." And the first mention of the Bishop of Rome does not come centuries later. The Bishops of Rome were traced back to Peter in early Christian writings:

According to Jerome in 383 AD:

"[Pope] Stephen . . . was the blessed Peter’s twenty-second successor in the See of Rome"
(Against the Luciferians 23 [A.D. 383]).

"Clement, of whom the apostle Paul writing to the Philippians says ‘With Clement and others of my fellow-workers whose names are written in the book of life,’ the fourth bishop of Rome after Peter, if indeed the second was Linus and the third Anacletus, although most of the Latins think that Clement was second after the apostle"
(Lives of Illustrious Men 15 [A.D. 396]).

And according to Eusebius even earlier, in 312 AD

"Paul testifies that Crescens was sent to Gaul [2 Tim. 4:10], but Linus, whom he mentions in the Second Epistle to Timothy [2 Tim. 4:21] as his companion at Rome, was Peter’s successor in the episcopate of the church there, as has already been shown. Clement also, who was appointed third bishop of the church at Rome, was, as Paul testifies, his co-laborer and fellow-soldier [Phil. 4:3]"
(Church History 3:4:9–10 [A.D. 312]).

So why don't you actually state facts instead of posting error and misinformation
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

lionroar0

Coffee drinker
Jul 10, 2004
9,362
705
54
✟35,401.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
^_^ Well since Peter did not Die for mens sin how can the church be built on Peter? And where is it ever stated that Peter is the Cornerstone?

I never said he was the corner stone.:p

Jesus is the corner stone. A corner stone has information about the foundation. Such as who paid for it. Meaning who bought the building material. Who hired the workers and when was it built.

Peace
 
Upvote 0
I never said he was the corner stone.:p

Jesus is the corner stone. A corner stone has information about the foundation. Such as who paid for it. Meaning who bought the building material. Who hired the workers and when was it built.

Peace
:confused:
    1. A stone at the corner of a building uniting two intersecting walls; a quoin.
    2. Such a stone, often inscribed, laid at a ceremony marking the origin of a building.
  1. An indispensable and fundamental basis: the cornerstone of an argument.
Literally, the stone placed at the corner of a building during construction. Figuratively, the item or person which began something significant.
So this is the rock that the Church is built upon not on Peter. For Peter didn't start anything but was a follower of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

katholikos

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2008
3,631
439
United States
✟6,027.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
:confused:
    1. A stone at the corner of a building uniting two intersecting walls; a quoin.
    2. Such a stone, often inscribed, laid at a ceremony marking the origin of a building.
  1. An indispensable and fundamental basis: the cornerstone of an argument.
Literally, the stone placed at the corner of a building during construction. Figuratively, the item or person which began something significant.
So this is the rock that the Church is built upon not on Peter. For Peter didn't start anything but was a follower of Christ.

A total misunderstanding of the Scripture.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.