Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Even a person on the deathbed can give all he owns to the poor, make friends with unrighteous mammon so that when he is helpless, he can be welcomed into eternal dwellings :Of course faith without works is dead. It remains that we are saved by a living faith alone. What about death bed conversions, where a person genuinely comes to Christ, but never has any opportunity for good works? Do they go to hell for lack of works? A living faith will exhibit works if given the opportunity, but a living faith that never produces works will still save.
That's interesting. NET is the only version that gives alternative translation options in its footnotes. Can you give citations for your statement?Psalms 78:19 (KJV), Yea, they spake against God; they said, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?
I don't go by the NET because it is widely used by those who wish to deny the Deity of Christ and other sound doctrine.
Even the thief on the cross evangelised.What about a homeless man who receives Christ in the last minutes of his life? You are implying that the sacrifice of Christ won't avail for him because he is poor!
The person genuinely receives Christ and croaks immediately afterwards. Saved or damned?Even the thief on the cross evangelised.
There are only two ways to be saved in the New Coventry. Which way did your candidate chose?The person genuinely receives Christ and croaks immediately afterwards. Saved or damned?
The word Son is not there, so both options are acceptable. NET chooses for probability. It doesn't mean they've given huge support for those who deny Christ's divinity because there are other texts that do teach Christ's divinity.Acts 20:28 is a proof of the Deity of Christ in the KJV, not so with the NET.
If no one can pay the cost why should they count it, think carefully if they can start out on the task?Funny, I was just reading that passage in Luke and was going to bring it up to you. What the passage teaches me is that no one can pay the cost, if they are utilizing their own resources. The only way to have enough resources is to bank on God's. And this means receiving salvation and an endless reservoir of Holy Ghost power as a free gift of the Lord's grace. If I rely on my own resources, I simply will not have enough to finish the building or defeat my enemy at war. At least, it is not guaranteed like the scenario where I bank on the Lord. And because my resources are finite, I'm not going to take any chances. If I bank on God, I will surely have enough. This is the grace of God.
So that they can realize that they themselves are morally bankrupt and can't pay the cost; so they can realize their need of a Saviour and turn to Him.If no one can pay the cost why should they count it, think carefully if they can start out on the task?
It could be the final proof text that convinces someone; and without it someone in particular may not ever be convinced of the truth. Therefore it could mean the difference between salvation and damnation for some Christadelphian or Jehovah's Witness. Of course we know that believing in the Deity of Christ is essential for salvation, John 8:24. Exodus 3:14, John 8:58-59, John 10:31-33.The word Son is not there, so both options are acceptable. NET chooses for probability. It doesn't mean they've given huge support for those who deny Christ's divinity because there are other texts that do teach Christ's divinity.
He didn't pay the cost, serve others. He didn't ask for terms of peace. He just stuck to mammon, trying to preserve his own neck by pleading, served himself. He didn't believe in Christ's ability to save. He believed in his own ability to whinge. That's not faith. What did he do to demonstrate Christ's ability to save, how was his faith perfected? He isn't saved.Also you didn't answer the question. Is the person on saved or damned?
The person is going to ignore other, stronger proof of the divinity of Christ? Looks like he loves the darkness and is only looking for excuses to crawl back in.It could be the final proof text that convinces someone; and without it someone in particular may not ever be convinced of the truth. Therefore it could mean the difference between salvation and damnation for some Christadelphian or Jehovah's Witness. Of course we know that believing in the Deity of Christ is essential for salvation, John 8:24. Exodus 3:14, John 8:58-59, John 10:31-33.
Actually its very clearly stated that if they realize they can't pay the cost, they should ask for terms of peace.So that they can realize that they themselves are morally bankrupt and can't pay the cost; so they can realize their need of a Saviour and turn to Him.
I don't think he's just talking about the rich, but Christians in general. You don't have to be rich in order to buy someone a meal who's hungry or provide some one with a blanket if they're cold. But to tell them to "feel warm" or "full" is not the way we should respond.I don't know where you got that but it wasn't from James. He is talking about how the rich treat the poor. I don't know what this, 'before man' thing is but the premise here is that in as much as you did for the least of my brethren you did unto me.
mark kennedy said:That much is true, we do represent a witness, doing your good works openly so to speak.
To me, the major significance of Philemon is that it shows the Bibles (Gods) viewpoint on slavery which many claim falsely that the Bible supports.mark kennedy said:Well yes, how we treat one another is something the world takes note of. Through the course of this thread I have did a little research on Onesimus and Philemon. Onesimus was a slave that fled Philemon and Paul sent him back to Philemon with the letter that bears his name. Onesimus became a very important Bishop, the Orthodox still venerate him as a saint. A slave became a leader in the early church because his master had mercy on him, due to the intercessions of the Apostle Paul. That's the least of us become the greatest, and the greatest become servant to all. That's what Paul and James are working on, and it bore fruit.
I agree with you statement above we are saved "for good works" and not by them. What I'm saying though (and part of what I believe James is conveying) is our justification, which comes about via our faith but also our works as well, in particular to the rest of the world, as we set the example that God wants us to set. As we give a testimony and which serves to prove our sincerity via our actions thereby justifying our position in Christ. As long as we give God all the credit (for our good and positive actions) rather than attempting to glorify ourselves, all will be well. Blessings to you as well.mark kennedy said:Wisdom is vindicated by her children and grace is known by it's fruit. We are saved for good works, not by them. God is glorified by these good deeds, not the least of which is how we treat one another. If you do it to be seen of men you forfeit the praise that comes from the Father. If we do our good deeds openly God is glorified and we share in the joy that comes from grace.
mark kennedy said:Grace and peace,
Mark
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?