Paul Pelosi/Rand Paul attacks comparison

[timothyu]

And not owning anything by 2030--we're ALL supposed to like that according to Klaus Schwab. But we're not supposed to remember that part.

Interesting that the economic growth is more for the elites as they ultimately get the money while the people pay for it all. But that is the way it has always been. The less money the lower classes have, the less they will own. The less food and products available the more willing they will be to fall in line and be happy with what they can get. The more they fall in line the less the chance of being cut off from the ability to buy and sell or participate in the new society.

 

[timothyu]

Not part of Biden's bill.

Reverse that. Part of the WEF's agenda.

 

[Aldebaran]

Not part of Biden's bill.

That's because biden's original bill had to be cut back from the 3.5 Trillion dollar version he couldn't get agreement on with Joe Manchin.

 

[Aldebaran]

Interesting that the economic growth is more for the elites as they ultimately get the money while the people pay for it all. But that is the way it has always been. The less money the lower classes have, the less they will own. The less food and products available the more willing they will be to fall in line and be happy with what they can get. The more they fall in line the less the chance of being cut off from the ability to buy and sell or participate in the new society.

Exactly! Some people seem to think that if a piece of legislation doesn't specifically say that people will own nothing and will like it, then it won't be the outcome. But at least Klaus Schwab is honest about it. OTOH, biden's handlers understand that Americans wouldn't tolerate it if they knew the truth, so they don't let him tell it.

 

[Gene2memE]

Build Back Better originated as a UN disaster recovery slogan, but it precedes the COVID-19 pandemic by better than a decade.

It's been used as a catchphrase response and set of policy recommendations to various natural disasters since at least 2004 (at least, that's the earliest citation I can find: https://buildbackbetter.co.nz/wp-co...ples-for-Reconstruction-Published-Chapter.pdf).

To an extent, you can thank Bill Clinton for that - he and a team of economists and disaster experts formalised a series of recovery propositions in 2005 around BBB principles following the Indian Ocean tsunami. That work has pretty much crystalised into a set of global guiding principles for disaster recovery.

It's completely unsurprising that BBB was adopted as a US policy moniker in the recovery from COVID-19 period. Nothing in the Biden Administration's BBB Plan is particularly outlandish - in many ways it's radically less ambitious than the Green New Deal plans of 2018/2019, particularly when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, social cost of carbon, protections for vulnerable communities and similar.

 

[timothyu]

OTOH, biden's handlers understand that Americans wouldn't tolerate it if they knew the truth, so they don't let him tell it.

Must be why he sent henchmen to Davos rather than go himself this time. Funny he has lowered his outward globalist outlook. Is he afraid Americans will catch on they are under the WEF now and suddenly see where Trump was coming from about remaining America the nation? No such luck in Canada. We are reminded daily who our leader is a graduate prince of.

 

[timothyu]

Build Back Better originated as a UN disaster recovery slogan, but it precedes the COVID-19 pandemic by better than a decade.

Yes, and the WEF's use of it goes further back, being 51 yrs old. And where do you think Clinton latched onto the concept from, or Gore and his environmental thing. The WEF was way ahead in promoting this to bolster sagging industry and means of new wealth.

 

[Aldebaran]

Must be why he sent henchmen to Davos rather than go himself this time. Funny he has lowered his outward globalist outlook. Is he afraid Americans will catch on they are under the WEF now and suddenly see where Trump was coming from about remaining America the nation? No such luck in Canada. We are reminded daily who our leader is a graduate prince of.

It really meshes with why biden and his people talk so much against MAGA (Make America Great Again). He's more interested in a global goal than helping America get ahead. Rubbing elbows with the billionaires of the world who can control the world's economies is so much more attractive than just serving the lowly people of America.

 

[Hans Blaster]

That's because biden's original bill had to be cut back from the 3.5 Trillion dollar version he couldn't get agreement on with Joe Manchin.

Elimination of private property in 8 years was part of the BBB bill? Sure it was. Care to prove it?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Reverse that. Part of the WEF's agenda.

I don't care what is in the "WEF agenda" if it isn't part of a US plan. Why should I? It's nothing other than some paranoid fantasy.

 

[timothyu]

Rubbing elbows with the billionaires of the world who can control the world's economies is so much more attractive than just serving the lowly people of America.

Yes, especially when like I said, they see themselves as the new saviours of the world. We must worship their achievements and model ourselves upon them as Christians do on the Christ. (end of days spoiler) We have been trained since birth to worship the system that allowed them to be successful. Therefore because of their success, we must listen to them rather than elected leaders. Not!

 

[Gene2memE]

And not owning anything by 2030--we're ALL supposed to like that according to Klaus Schwab. But we're not supposed to remember that part.

Not really.

Here's the original video where that claim is made. 8 predictions for the world in 2030 | You'll own nothing, and you'll be happy. This is how our world could change by 2030. Read more: http://wef.ch/2gmBN7M | By World Economic Forum | Facebook

It's a set of predictions about the future, not a goal, plan or even a policy suggestion. It was not made by Klaus Schwab, but by a body of 700 or so experts in various fields known as the Global Future Council.

The actual content for the video was written by Danish politician Ida Auken.

WEF didn’t say that property ownership would become ‘unsustainable’ - Full Fact
Fact check: The World Economic Forum does not have a stated goal to have people own nothing by 2030

As a 'Staff Member', should you not be doing a bare minimum of fact checking before you post? Or is spreading misinformation part of Christian Forums policy now?

 

[Aldebaran]

Elimination of private property in 8 years was part of the BBB bill? Sure it was. Care to prove it?

You just proved what I said in post 344 to be correct.

 

[timothyu]

Elimination of private property in 8 years was part of the BBB bill? Sure it was. Care to prove it?

People can't even afford groceries and gas now, let alone keep up with taxes *for those lucky enough to not have a mortgage). A lot of property will be taken over just as farms were and owners will become renters or simply accept food and a place to live in trade for loyalty and service. A lot of people would sell out their grandmother for such a deal.

 

[Aldebaran]

I don't care what is in the "WEF agenda" if it isn't part of a US plan. Why should I? It's nothing other than some paranoid fantasy.

That "paranoid fantasy" is still part of the WEF website. Maybe they're proud of being paranoid and fantastical, or they would have taken it down by now: 8 predictions for the world in 2030

 

[Hans Blaster]

You just proved what I said in post 344 to be correct.

So we're supposed to read between the lines for things that aren't actually there, now?

Maybe we should move this to the CT forum.

 

[timothyu]

Maybe they're proud of being paranoid and fantastical

That is what narcissistic world leaders are all about.

 

[Lady Bug]

If it was Paul Pelosi's hammer, then it could mean a number of things. First, it means the intruder didn't come to the home with it, which would mean he didn't necessarily go there to do harm. It could also mean that Pelosi is the one who picked it up and started the hostilities, and the other guy was simply trying to defend himself from Pelosi.

Wut?

 

[essentialsaltes]

Wut?

Desperation.

 

[Bradskii]

Wut?

Fantasy land.