Please show anything in the US Constitution that indicates this. Show where ANY form of speech is reserved from the First Amendment protection of Free Speech.
Is it in the US Constitution as an exception???The easiest example is yelling fire in a theater -- that is quite illegal...
I have not missed it. If they speak about it anywhere near an abortion clinic, they certainly have been hauled off to jail.
Refusing to participate in something that is wrong according to a citizen's protected religious freedom is not equivalent to MOB RETRIBUTION.
Right expressions of constitutionally protected religious freedom are under assault in this and other ways by the democratic (being born of democracy) mob.
It is LAWFUL, LEGAL according to the US Constitution to peaceably assemble, and speak about what abortion really is, but that has gotten people arrested.
Is it in the US Constitution as an exception???
Unconstitutional behavior by those localities, and " late 1800s and early 1900s" is NOT ALWAYS...... in the western US in the late 1800s and early 1900s there were frequently laws banning firearms within a towns city limits, where the guns must be left with the sheriff...
Is it in the US Constitution as an exception???
I have not missed it. If they speak about it anywhere near an abortion clinic, they certainly have been hauled off to jail.
Refusing to participate in something that is wrong according to a citizen's protected religious freedom is not equivalent to MOB RETRIBUTION. The exact opposite is happening. Right expressions of constitutionally protected religious freedom are under assault in this and other ways by the democratic (being born of democracy) mob.
It is LAWFUL, LEGAL according to the US Constitution to peaceably assemble, and speak about what abortion really is, but that has gotten people arrested. The US Constitution guarantees other rights, but in 1968, contrary to that founding document, lawful, legal possession of certain firearms were made illegal. People have gone to jail for that. Some were people who had not ever been arrested for anything prior.
We are discussing going the OPPOSITE way with this, though. Illegal behavior is made legal, being required to be allowed where it is against the will of the people, and even required to be accepted as normal, though it is deviant behavior.
Deemed unconstitutional. A blight on the history of the nation!
Not always the case, not necessarily the case.
I'll persist in asking, where in the US Constitution is there an exception to free speech, more particularly pertaining to any of these things?
Just as other poster are free to make accusations, I'm free to ask for actual examples. This sub discussion has nothing to do with the Constitution.I'll persist in asking, where in the US Constitution is there an exception to free speech, more particularly pertaining to any of these things?
Where in the US Constitution does it state that freedom of speech is unlimited?
Show me in the First Amendment where the limits are.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Thanks for remaining CIVIL. I know you think this is being cordial, but it is actually merely CIVIL... We could get to the "cordial" level, but I do not see that happening for a number of reasons, many of which are not in my control.Just as other poster are free to make accusations, I'm free to ask for actual examples. This sub discussion has nothing to do with the Constitution.
But in it spirit of keeping it cordial, there is another sub discussion going on. It does have to do with the Constitution. And I think another poster answered your question already, here-->
Civil, fair enough.Thanks for remaining CIVIL. I know you think this is being cordial, but it is actually merely CIVIL... We could get to the "cordial" level, but I do not see that happening for a number of reasons, many of which are not in my control.
You will need to "quote" that post, as the member is on Digital Ignore status with me. I ignored those comments, by reading past them, as long as seemed reasonable, and now do not see them, nor do I desire to see them.
Having seen other replies, however, I know there are things people recognize as ILLEGAL that have nothing to do with expressing offensive political, or religious oriented speech. That is a "strawman" though, because it is not what any of the "free speech" issues we were discussing were related to.
I am responding to the point of equating the religious freedom afforded by the law instituted under Clinton #42, and the Indiana law, to people with no religious standing or position.
Interpretations made by the Judicial Branch carry the weight of the US Constitution.
Show me in the First Amendment where the limits are.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?