In ancient times, heaven was thought to be just "up there", just beyond the sky, somewhere we could get to if you could fly high enough. Or, based on some ancient Jewish thought, a series of levels up above the lower levels of our earth and sky. But still "up there". And Scripture was written from this perspective. It talks about going "up" to heaven, and Hell is going "down", deep into the earth. Scripture after Scripture uses this language, which was both a reflection of the current "science" and became such a strong and evocative presentation that it still is our basic default for discussion.
Now, most Christians, Jews and Muslims today do not really think heaven is up in the sky, or even out in space. We do not think heaven is "head toward alpha centuari, then take a left at the third star". We do not believe we could get there with the right space ship. We realize that heaven is a place that is separate from our current physical reality, a real and physical place, but not within our existing universe. And we don't believe that Hell is really down in the depths of our current earth (although it would be hot enough!), and that Satan is really in a pool of magma a few miles underground. Hell is a real place, but not one we could drill down and find.
But this is a fairly new perspective, and one that has kind of snuck up on us without much fanfare. We quite easily, even subconsciously, reassessed all those myriad of Scriptures that were based on, and reinforced, the ancient perspective, and simply ditched the literal interpretation. For some reason, it did not even cause a ripple that I have seen, as contrasted with the geocentrism fiasco, in which it took hundreds of years, some claims of heresy and a lot of angst, before we shifted our collective interpretation from literal to figurative on that issue.
The sad situation is that the age of the earth and evolutionary development are taking the "heresy and angst" route to acceptance rather than the "ah, well then, it must be figurative" approach we adopted with heaven. The end result will be the same, we will still end up with a full acceptance of the evidence from God's Creation and simply realize that our literal/historical reading was incorrect, but it is a crying shame we have to take this long, damaging road to get there.
Now, most Christians, Jews and Muslims today do not really think heaven is up in the sky, or even out in space. We do not think heaven is "head toward alpha centuari, then take a left at the third star". We do not believe we could get there with the right space ship. We realize that heaven is a place that is separate from our current physical reality, a real and physical place, but not within our existing universe. And we don't believe that Hell is really down in the depths of our current earth (although it would be hot enough!), and that Satan is really in a pool of magma a few miles underground. Hell is a real place, but not one we could drill down and find.
But this is a fairly new perspective, and one that has kind of snuck up on us without much fanfare. We quite easily, even subconsciously, reassessed all those myriad of Scriptures that were based on, and reinforced, the ancient perspective, and simply ditched the literal interpretation. For some reason, it did not even cause a ripple that I have seen, as contrasted with the geocentrism fiasco, in which it took hundreds of years, some claims of heresy and a lot of angst, before we shifted our collective interpretation from literal to figurative on that issue.
The sad situation is that the age of the earth and evolutionary development are taking the "heresy and angst" route to acceptance rather than the "ah, well then, it must be figurative" approach we adopted with heaven. The end result will be the same, we will still end up with a full acceptance of the evidence from God's Creation and simply realize that our literal/historical reading was incorrect, but it is a crying shame we have to take this long, damaging road to get there.