Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I believe Jesus walked on water, irregardless of what science says.
Am I lying?
That's a loaded question.Do you really approve of the deliberate misrepresentation of radiometric dating by Ham and others? Honestly AV, please give a simple yes or no answer.
So the other 76 [of 80] methods return the same ages?This is not the first time you have shared that with us. This is also not the first time I have pointed out that your pastor is uninformed. You may tell him I said so, In fact I encourage you to do so.
So the other 76 [of 80] methods return the same ages?
I say there was a global flood in Noah's time, despite what I've been told otherwise.That is totally non sequitur to the topic and discussion. Jesus walking on water is a belief of written scripture, there is no physical supporting evidence that can be falsified in that particular case. Conversely, the fact that Ken Ham has been shown to deliberately misrepresent radiometric dating in many different ways is clear physical falsifiable evidence that he is lying. Do you understand the difference?
13That is not what he is saying. What he said is that your pastor is wrong. I cannot evaluate the claim because I never saw it in detail. How about you post a list of the methods, and then a list of papers where people reject them in favor of the ones that give them the dates they expect? This must be very easy to do if your pastor is telling the truth.
I say there was a global flood in Noah's time, despite what I've been told otherwise.
Am I lying?
50Yeah, not what I asked, so I can't refute it due to the lack of information. Again, just give me a list of the methods, and a list of the papers where they are rejected.
How about oil pressure?
Oil reservoirs underground are under great pressure. Since rocks are porous, this oil should be forced into them, reducing the pressure; but since we don't find this happening, it is evidence that that oil hasn't been there as long as evolutionist models say it is.
And how porous does your Arab phone say I claim it is?How about oil pressure?
Oil reservoirs underground are under great pressure. Since rocks are porous, this oil should be forced into them, reducing the pressure; but since we don't find this happening, it is evidence that that oil hasn't been there as long as evolutionist models say it is.
If rocks were as porous as you claim they are,
That's a loaded question.
So the other 76 [of 80] methods return the same ages?
That's not what I, or my pastor, said.There are not 80 radiometric methods for dating the earth...
I say there was a global flood in Noah's time, despite what I've been told otherwise.
Am I lying?
I say there was a global flood in Noah's time, despite what I've been told otherwise.
Am I lying?
There's that p-word again.No, you are not lying because that is your belief. Now, it you claim that the Grand Canyon or marine fossils on mountain tops prove the flood was global, then you are uninformed. However, after being shown where that is wrong and continuing to make the same claims, that is lying to yourself and others you tell it to.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?