Origins of the Universe and Science investigated

[Piet Strydom]

Dear Friends.
over the past 2 weeks I posted something very little people know.
The fact that Immanuel Kant wrote in 1755 his Universal Natural History and Theory of Heaven based on Newtonian principles, is something Atheists don't want anyone to know about. You can do research in many modern publications on the world's great philosophers, and you will find Kant mentioned as the person who, through his writings on Reason, in particular Critique on Pure Reason, claim that Kant coined the thought of Agnosticism.
Because his works actually postulated that it is not possible to prove the existence of the supernatural, it is not possible to prove God!
What Atheists don't do is to also elaborate that Kant said it is not possible to have evidence of the existence of God, but also, there is no evidence to the contrary!

However, you will never find any atheist quoting his Universal natural history.
Why, Because in this publication Kant gave us his understanding of the origins of the Solar System by a nebular cloud, and made it clear that it also accounts for the rest of the Universe.
needless to say, Laplace tried to come up with an alternative to Kant's thesis, but was proven incorrect within 50 years from his explanation.
Today the nebular theory is actual proven fact through observation into the Universe, and the resulting scientific discoveries made due to what Kant wrote on the topic.
Now, whay would the Atheist hate Kant this much?
Simple, this guy knew the Bible very well and he had most of it memorized. He was a Pietist and devoted believer in the Bible.
In his publication he praised the Bible for this insight, praised God for the evidence He gave to us in the Universe, and most of all, claimed that this is evidence of the existence of the God of the Bible.

Anyhow, newton also observed Genesis as I have discussed it on this forum.
Why do I say this?
Well, it was never recorded that Isaac Newton actually said "I got the idea of Gravity when an apple fell on my head."
There is only one person that heard this from Newton, William Stukeley, who also wrote the first biography of Britain's greatest scientist, entitled Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's Life.
He spoke to newton in 1726, one year before his death, when Newton told him this story.
Stuckley only mentioned this 15 Years later in his publication.

Now, this is what we must keep in mind, Newton wrote more on the Bible, prophecies and timelines in the Bible than what he did on science. He was one of the worlds greatest scientists, but also one of the greatest biblical students and claimed that the Bible was without error, the Bible explains everything, and together with creation is evidence that God exists!

Guess what?
He also loved to be mysterious, left clues and played with metaphors on a lot of his thoughts and studies.
He left the following clue.
An Apple fell on my head and I started thinking about gravity!
this actually means, I thought about Genesis (the Apple) and it fell on my thoughts, and I did research on gravity, and found it to be explained.
Greetings.
Try to get Kant's book. No atheist can get around the fact that what science today uses to discard God, was taken from Genesis!
I love the Bible and the wisdom therein.

 

[Piet Strydom]

Today I will continue with what the Bible say on the origins of the Universe.
The best way to investigate on it is to listen to the Atheist critisizm.
They always have 2 objections about Genesis.
1. How is it possible that the Earth was created 6000 years ago, but we see distant starlight with an age of 18.5 billion years.
2. If there was a global flood that covered the whole of the Earth, and the Himalaya is more than 8 850 meters above sea level. If the Earth was covered with 8.8 Km of water covering the whole sphere of the Earth, where did this water come from, and where did it go to?

Well, on point 1, we see that the Bible gives a description of the Earth being created in 6 days, we will not for now go into the lengths of the days of Genesis, and together with this 6 days, the Earth created before the first day in what I call Zero time.
Why do I say Zero time?
Because the clockwork mechanism to measure days and years still did not exist.
Simple, we need a Sun and earth to enable us to measure time and if the Sun was still in a Nebulous cloud before light was created (before it started to glow a dim red light because of the absence of nuclear fusion) and if the Earth was still a collection of Liquid, Matter and Gas, we dont have a "clock" to measure Time!
Even science is in agreement with this observation in admitting that the Universe is 18.5 billion years old, but the Solar System only 4.5 billion years.
So, how do they measure 14 billion years of age without the presence of the Sun and Earth?
They simply imagine that time exist as we know it.
They measure the distance of a star and divide it into the speed of light and determine how long the light took to arrive here on Earth.
What they say is that the far off star existed long before the Earth and Sun and claim that the Bible is wrong.
Realy, is this not the same as what the Bible claims?
The Earth was made 6000 years and 6 days and Zero time when it was still shaping from dust into a sphere!
If science wants to call this Zero time of the Bible, Billions of years, they are welcome to do so.
It does not contradict the Bible, it actually proves the incredible ancient description by a much higher intellectual being who understood how He made it all!

 

[Piet Strydom]

I went through a few scientific papers and came upon this one which says that the earth was formed out of water and matter during the nebulous state and acretion process.
Just like Genesis!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23734050

 

[Piet Strydom]

Wow, and here we have even the Royal society publishing the fact that the Earth was as Genesis explains. (obviously they dont know it was as Kant and Genesis described, but the fact remain that Genesis was correct!)
http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/371/1994/20110585.long

 

[Colter]

The suns, stars planets and moons were indeed formed out of the great nebular wheels billions of years ago. Its the technique used to create galaxies and solar systems all through the universe of trillions and trillions of such. The technique of evolution is how life is created on the evolutionary worlds.

 

[Piet Strydom]

The technique of evolution is how life is created on the evolutionary worlds.

"Technique of Evolution?"
Please explain, is this the same as "Theory" of evolution?

 

[Colter]

"Technique of Evolution?"
Please explain, is this the same as "Theory" of evolution?

The technique of evolution is Gods ordained way for the evolutionary worlds of time and space. The theory of evolution is mans observation of the results.

 

[Piet Strydom]

This is true indeed.
if I observe the evolution of the Universe and the Solar system described in Genesis as well as scientific observations, I must agree.
However, when it comes to Life, I have huge doubts on the interpretation of the observations.

 

[Piet Strydom]

Now, I finished my studies on the origins of the Universe in relation to the Bible and Science, and I hope everyone understands that what the Bible declared on this topic, was found to be true and correct by Modern science and was unknowingly taken up by Science without realizing it is a Biblical source.

Now we can continue to speak about Time.
What does the Bible say about it, what does Science say about it and do they correlate on what time is?
I will open another thread, as I did with the explanation of the origins of the Flood.