David Gould
Pearl Harbor sucked. WinAce didn't.
- May 28, 2002
- 16,931
- 514
- 55
- Faith
- Atheist
- Politics
- AU-Labor
FEZZILLA said:EVEN NOTHING IS SOMETHING:by Jason S.Fessenden
Everything was Nothing before there was something.
Everything is something even if its nothing at all.
For nothingness came from something;
And that something has always been there.
Without an Infinite designer,nothing,could not have ever been.
For even nothing...is something..
God spoke;
And everything became something and everything around us.
We can try and question the reasoning of this poem,but the poem will not fall nor bend. Nothing has no essense or mass or color. If we would give nothing a color we would compair it to a clear coat paint. The paint is there and yet,theres nothing. But you do know the clear paint is there so you know even the nothingness exist. But it only exist through your own handy work of creation. your the one who sprayed the paint.so in reality,Without a designer,we would even have that clear color coated paint.
In the universe the same rules apply:
Every design implies a designer;
Everydesigner implies a cause;
The designers cause was man!
God created the universe with man in mind.
Still not convinced?
If nothing produced something than what does nothing look like?
Blackness is of nothingness yet a mixure of colors.
White is justified by the complete spectrum of light.
A Blackhole is of nothingness yet has form,energy,and a cause.A blackhole is without a doubt-something.
Does nothing have emotions?
Can nothing think?
Does nothing cry?
Does nothing forgive?
Does nothing dream?
Is nothing well organized?
Is the belief in nothing even a rational concept?
Firstly, this argument does not address the idea that everything we see has always existed in one form or another (eternal universe and all that).
Secondly, it does not address the idea that time began with the rest of the universe and thus there never was nothing - at no time in this history of the universe has nothing existed.
Thirdly, it does not address the problem of where the designer came from. If organisation needs organisation to create it, was there a super God? And a super duper God, ad infinitum?
Fourthly, it does not address the idea that we do not understand exactly what 'nothingness' would entail. It could be that nothingness is "a potentiality for something".
As soon as you use the word 'nothing' you are suggesting that it is something - if it weren't, you could not use the term.
Upvote
0