• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Oneness with Evolution

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
27,882
21,937
Flatland
✟1,169,655.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Speaking of looking into an animal's eyes, I am finishing up Michael Pollan's book "The Omnivore's Dilemma," and on page 306...

"A few years ago the English writer John Berger wrote an essay called "Why Look at Animals?" in which he suggested that the loss of everyday contact between ourselves and animals - specifically the loss of eye contact - has left us deeply confused about the terms of our relationship to other species. That eye contact, always slightly uncanny, had brought the vivid daily reminder that animals were both crucially lilke and unlike us; in their eyes we glimpsed something unmistakably familiar (pain, fear, courage) but also something irretrievably other (?!). Upon this paradox people built a relationship in which they felt they could both honor and eat animals without looking away."

I heard a scientist on a TV show recently claim dogs (man's best friend) are the only animal that will maintain eye contact with humans for more than a few seconds, as if they're trying to understand our communication. Not sure what it means, but maybe it means dogs really are our species' best friend.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
I heard a scientist on a TV show recently claim dogs (man's best friend) are the only animal that will maintain eye contact with humans for more than a few seconds, as if they're trying to understand our communication. Not sure what it means, but maybe it means dogs really are our species' best friend.

I just now looked my cat straight in the eyes for several seconds. So no, it's not a dog thing. It may, however, be a domesticated animal thing.
 
Upvote 0

GrowingSmaller

Muslm Humanist
Apr 18, 2010
7,424
346
✟64,499.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
I own a starling. It has been one of the most remarkable experiences in my 56 years. When I look into my starling's eyes, I see 10's of millions of years of evolution that separate us, but yet, there is a oneness there that takes my breath away. Astonishing wonder. I don't need a god, or religion, or any of that clutter to be inspired. I've found it in a lowly bird who evolved before me. Find it. You will be changed forever.
You need your eyes checking then. Starlings and their ancestors have been evolving for just as long as we have.
 
Upvote 0

LifeToTheFullest!

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
5,069
155
✟6,295.00
Faith
Agnostic
I heard a scientist on a TV show recently claim dogs (man's best friend) are the only animal that will maintain eye contact with humans for more than a few seconds, as if they're trying to understand our communication. Not sure what it means, but maybe it means dogs really are our species' best friend.
Yeah, I once looked into a gorilla's eyes for about 20 seconds at the San Diego Zoo.

Was the 'scientist' you were watching on the TBN? It wasn't Ray Comfort was it?
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
You need your eyes checking then. Starlings and their ancestors have been evolving for just as long as we have.

Yes, they have. For tens of millions of years. So there's that length of time for evolution to separate us. Evolution on both sides. I'm not really seeing a problem with what futzman said.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,045
52,816
Guam
✟5,224,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yeah, I once looked into a gorilla's eyes for about 20 seconds at the San Diego Zoo.

I can only imagine what they are thinking when you guys do that.
monkey_evolution.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Sep 10, 2010
295
4
✟30,500.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I heard a scientist on a TV show recently claim dogs (man's best friend) are the only animal that will maintain eye contact with humans for more than a few seconds, as if they're trying to understand our communication. Not sure what it means, but maybe it means dogs really are our species' best friend.

I might have more proof of a dog being our best freind. I locked my wife and dog in the trunk of my car and drove around for over an hour. When I opened the trunk, the dog wagged its tail and was happy to see me.:)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,857,045
52,816
Guam
✟5,224,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I might have more proof of a dog being our best freind. I locked my wife and dog in the trunk of my car and drove around for over an hour. When I opened the trunk, the dog wagged its tail and was happy to see me.:)
^_^
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟37,581.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I own a starling. It has been one of the most remarkable experiences in my 56 years. When I look into my starling's eyes, I see 10's of millions of years of evolution that separate us, but yet, there is a oneness there that takes my breath away. Astonishing wonder. I don't need a god, or religion, or any of that clutter to be inspired. I've found it in a lowly bird who evolved before me. Find it. You will be changed forever.

What do I see in a lowly bird? The loving Father who created us both.

"Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?" (Matthew 6)

Whether God created all things ex nihilo or through a lengthy process is beside the point.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟37,581.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Even in the abominations?

As one who is in the Lord Jesus, I am fully convinced that no food is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for him it is unclean.
Romans 14

“Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? 19 For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)
Mark 7
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
27,882
21,937
Flatland
✟1,169,655.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Of course I want my kids to ask question. Why wouldn't I or where did you get the idea I wouldn't?

Now, are you saying that after I explained to you HOW I found my meaning of life, you still find it 'mysterious?' I'd explain it the same way to them and, hopefully, they'd be better at grasping what I told them. Now, it doesn't mean that they have to adopt the same meaning for their lives I did.

It's internally inconsistent, incongruent, and contradictory to reality because none of it is real in any way we can verify nor demonstrate.

I already gave you the reason I came to my meaning of life and it'd be the same I'd tell them.

No you didn't.

They won't necessarily ask questions. A lot of people, I dare say, the majority are trained to no ask questions, usurp the status quo, or 'make waves,' in church, school work, and social situations. I want to actively teach them to ask questions and critically think about everything through.

That's not what you said before. You said you were going to tell them what to believe.

As far as the second part of that, I have no idea what "the true meaning" is and if you mean that it's the meaning that we should all follow, then I'll have to ask you to demonstrate why anyone should reasonably follow this "true meaning" with verifiable evidence.

If you have no idea what the true meaning is, then you shouldn't tell children you do know.

I just now looked my cat straight in the eyes for several seconds. So no, it's not a dog thing. It may, however, be a domesticated animal thing.

Right, animals can become like us through domestication, I think, as Christ can domesticate humans to become more like God.
 
Upvote 0

futzman

Regular Member
Jul 26, 2005
527
18
71
✟771.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian
What do I see in a lowly bird? The loving Father who created us both.

"Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they?" (Matthew 6)

Whether God created all things ex nihilo or through a lengthy process is beside the point.

And, helps them loose a leg when they are bad baby birds?

BV6G8857_640x480.jpg


I guess I just don't share your view of a "loving Father." I would say nature is cruel, but as someone once put it (Darwin?) it's simply indifferent.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
49
Burnaby
Visit site
✟44,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
Upvote 0

futzman

Regular Member
Jul 26, 2005
527
18
71
✟771.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Libertarian
You need your eyes checking then. Starlings and their ancestors have been evolving for just as long as we have.

Birds recognizable as modern birds have been around far longer than humans recognizable as humans. But that was not what I was referring to when I said "10s of millions". Birds and humans have been on separate evolutionary paths for 10s of millions and still we can share a connection.
 
Upvote 0