• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

once saved always saved

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

Excellent!

At what time during his riotous life, did the prodigal son cease to be his Father's son?

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

ByTheSpirit

Come Lord Jesus
May 17, 2011
11,460
4,690
Manhattan, KS
✟198,594.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One must persevere in faith to be saved.; True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God’s gift.; Those dying without faith in Christ are condemned.; Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with.; God will preserve true believers and they will be saved.

The first statement "One must persevere in faith to be saved." places the responsibility of perseverance on the believer (One must persevere). The last statement "God will preserve true believers and they will be saved." places it on God (God will preserve) That is a contradiction, is it not?

True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. If one MUST persevere in the faith to be saved, how can this statement be true. Either you have to persevere to be saved, or you can not lose your faith PERIOD (perseverance or no). This is a contradiction.

Those who lose their faith never had it to begin with. In order to lose something a person has to have it first right? I can not lose my marbles (no laughing) if I never had them to begin with. I can not lose my car keys without first having car keys to lose. Simple facts of life, you must have something in order to lose it. So this statement just contradicts itself. Not to mention the previous statement of True believers cannot lose their faith, since it is God's gift. would seem to contradict this point's specific statement in that if "true believers" can't lose their faith, they have had faith at one point. Thus, those who lose their faith can be true believers because true believers have faith at some time. (I hope that made sense)

In saying all this, does Jesus, or God for that matter, make empty promises/threats?

Jesus said in John 15:5 that those who remain in Him and He in them will bear much fruit. He then says two things in two seperate verses in the same context. In verse 2 of that chapter, Jesus says that those in Him who do NOT bear fruit will be cut off. In verse 6 of that chapter Jesus says that those who do not remain in Him, he will be cast off and thrown into the fire. So if you remain in Jesus your life will be characterized by bearing fruit. If you do not remain in Jesus, you will bear no fruit and thus be cut off and cast into the fire.

Jesus says in Revelation 3:5 if you endure He will not blot your name out of the book of life, so once again does Jesus make empty promises, or threats even, without the intention of bringing them to pass. It would seem to me if Jesus says endure to inherit eternal life, He means just that, not well these are just guidelines, I won't actually blot out your name...
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I just want to say, my position is and always will be:


Abstract of Principles, 1858, James P. Boyce, Section XIII, Perseverance of the Saints

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, I agree that the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. That, however, says nothing about the human response to those gifts and calling.

I agree with all the others you mentioned, too. But again these are attributes and characteristics of God and do not address man's responsibility.

As for eternal life; I'm beginning to think that the "eternal" aspect of that life is a characteristic of that life itself and is not referring to the duration of our possession of it.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
At what time during his riotous life, did the prodigal son cease to be his Father's son?
Maybe it was when he died. The father did say that he was dead. Or maybe he never ceased being his father's son, but the fact is, he squandered his inheritance, so he lost that.
 
Upvote 0

Lindas Place

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
1,198
108
United States
✟24,355.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Greatdivide46... So we agree on these things…

Salvation is by grace, through faith, not by works.
Believers receive the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.
The gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
God is on the throne.
God will not forsake.
The Trinity, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Onlybygrace added these… which I agree, do you agree?

There will be evidence of salvation.
The Holy Spirit produces the Fruit of the Spirit
Faith is by definition is not fleeting
There are those who say they know Him that do not.

These you disagree with, let’s discuss…

Eternal Life is not by definition a future time.
It is not temporary life in Christ, but eternal life in Christ.

Can eternal life be temporary?

That contradicts the words of Jesus which states that he who believeth on the Son of God HAS eternal life. John 3:36

Jesus' definition of eternal life in John 17:2-3

2 For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. 3 Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
These you disagree with, let’s discuss…

Eternal Life is not by definition a future time.
It is not temporary life in Christ, but eternal life in Christ.

Can eternal life be temporary?
No, eternal life cannot be temporary, however, I do believe that our possession of it can be temporary. We do not have eternal life eternally since we were not born with it and our possession of it had a beginning in our life.

That contradicts the words of Jesus which states that he who believeth on the Son of God HAS eternal life. John 3:36
Precisely. Eternal life is something we possess. It is not something we are.


Jesus' definition of eternal life in John 17:2-3
2 For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. 3 Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.
Exactly. Eternal life is something we are given. Therefore it is a possession and possessions can be lost.
 
Upvote 0

Lindas Place

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
1,198
108
United States
✟24,355.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do you lose the gift of eternal life? if it's eternal life?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,124
4,133
On the bus to Heaven
✟82,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Eternal life is indeed something that we are. Salvation is not something that we possess. We are a new creature (2 Cor. 5:17).

17 Therefore if anyone is in Christ, [h]he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come. 18 Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, 19 namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and [i]He has [j]committed to us the word of reconciliation.

Are you suggesting that a new creature, which is by necessity a work of God, can be reverted back to the old creature even after being born again of the Spirit?

Old creature------->new creature------->old creature?
 
Upvote 0

phoenixdem

Newbie
Nov 28, 2010
1,158
34
South Dakota
✟16,580.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Is that what Jesus said, or did He said this,

John
6:37 All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that
cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.
6:38 For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the
will of him that sent me.
6:39 And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he
hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at​
the last day.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,188
2,677
62
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟107,834.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Eternal life is something we are given. Therefore it is a possession and possessions can be lost.

So, God can lose one of His own possessions?

Isn't that contray to scripture.

"For ye are bought with a price:" -1 Cor. 6:20 (KJV)

And does not the scripture also say:

"And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand." -Jn. 6: 28-29 (KJV)

Now I'm not taking about going out and purposely sinning, rather, once God has bought us, become His possession, He is able to lose us?

Are we not bought?

So God is able to be like sinful man and lose someone He has bought?!?

God just lost all His onmipotence.

Man being able to take Himself out of God's hand makes him more powerful than the Creator of all things.

God has been de-throned.

Bravo!

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How do you lose the gift of eternal life? if it's eternal life?
I've come to think that "lose" is the wrong word. I think maybe "return" better communicates what I believe concerning loss of salvation. We don't lose it so much as return it back to the giver. I'm with you, though, in that I can't imagine why anyone would ever want to do that, but I simply cannot deny the possibility based on the Word of God's plethora of warnings not to do it.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you suggesting that a new creature, which is by necessity a work of God, can be reverted back to the old creature even after being born again of the Spirit?

Old creature------->new creature------->old creature?
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm simply stating that the Word of God warns against that possibility. What I'm having a problem with is if it is impossible for that to happen, why all the warnings against it?
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This passage is true. However, it says nothing about man's response or responsibility in salvation. It only talks about what God the Father and God the Son will do.
 
Upvote 0

greatdivide46

Junior Member
Nov 7, 2011
1,390
138
Alabama
✟24,561.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, God can lose one of His own possessions?
Of course not. God is not man.

Now I'm not taking about going out and purposely sinning, rather, once God has bought us, become His possession, He is able to lose us?
No, God is not man.

Are we not bought?

So God is able to be like sinful man and lose someone He has bought?!?
Nope, God is not like sinful man.

Man being able to take Himself out of God's hand makes him more powerful than the Creator of all things.

God has been de-throned.
I disagree. Man being able to take himself out of God's hand says nothing at all about the power of the Creator of all things. I does say something about His willingness to let His creatures have their own way, though, even if He doesn't like it! What a great and powerful God who can be that way.
 
Upvote 0

Lindas Place

Newbie
Oct 11, 2011
1,198
108
United States
✟24,355.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Greatdivide… I disagree, that would not be a great powerful god… that would be a weak, dead beat dad… and he has let the kids take control to their on demise... the kids are on the throne.

You already agreed that “God is on the throne” now you are contradicting that…

You cannot claim you could push God away, walk away or jump out of His hand, then claim that was not something you did in your power over God's...

If an argument presented creates a contradiction in the biblical text, that argument must change… and your argument creates a contradiction. Either God is on the throne or not.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,124
4,133
On the bus to Heaven
✟82,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm simply stating that the Word of God warns against that possibility. What I'm having a problem with is if it is impossible for that to happen, why all the warnings against it?

But the word of God does not warn about that possibility in a general way. The warnings are usually given to a specific group or for a specific purpose.

Jude 1
24 Now to Him who is able to keep you from stumbling, and to make you stand in the presence of His glory blameless with great joy,

It is God who is able to keep us from stumbling. It is God that makes you stand in His presence. The English translations do not so this verse justice since the one to one, meaning to meaning translation ratio is difficult. The Greek word φυλάξαι, rendered here as "to keep", carries the meaning of "to guard" "to keep watch" "to guard closely" in Koine Greek. The word δυναμένῳ, rendered here as "is able", does not carry the temporal option that it does on English. The word carries the sense of "empower", "power" and is a cognate of δύναμις which carries the meaning and sense of physical power and force. In other words, it is God's power that keeps the believer from stumbling not our own power.

Paul tells us in Eph. 4:

30 Do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, [w]by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.

Here he exhorts the believer to not grieve the Spirit but he also reveals a deeper truth. Paul reveals that the believer was sealed for the day of redemption. If a believer can loose salvation then Paul is mistaken and the verse should read "by whom you were sealed until the day of apostasy, or until the day that one continually sins, or until the day that one decides that they will no longer follow Christ". That is not the case. The preposition εἰς, rendered here as "for", indicates a point reached or entered. The idea is absolute. The believer is sealed for the day of redemption not the believer might be sealed for the day of redemption.

We can look at each instance of warning in the NT if you wish but warnings do not constitute soteriological removal of one that has been sealed in the Spirit for the day of redemption. Paul goes even further and reveals to us in 1 Cor. 3 the exact method of judgment for those sealed in the Spirit for the day of redemption. Granted, some might be mighty crispy but they are saved nonetheless.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,124
4,133
On the bus to Heaven
✟82,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I have a question for you regarding your statements above. Does God have multiple realities? Does He awaits our choice to complete His will?

Ok, that's two questions. lol
 
Upvote 0

phoenixdem

Newbie
Nov 28, 2010
1,158
34
South Dakota
✟16,580.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

What will you do with those verses that say the opposite? Do you just ignore them, or do you try to reconcile the verses?
 
Upvote 0

WinBySurrender

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2011
3,670
155
.
✟4,924.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
So an adopted son could never walk away from his adopted family and disown them?
That's not "disowning." The father didn't do it, the son did. Such a child of God would have little or no reward in heaven, and would likely be called home early (ala the threat Paul made to the young Corinthian man who was sleeping with his stepmother) to preserve his soul. But salvation cannot be lost, no matter how some might twist or misinterpret Scripture.
 
Upvote 0