• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Once Saved, Always Saved

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard

Legend
Aug 2, 2004
12,919
500
✟38,423.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

AMEN !!!!! That is such a great thing. MANY reps to you !!!!
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
2 Peter 2:20-22

20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. 21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.


Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

Lynn73

Jesus' lamb
Sep 15, 2003
6,035
362
70
Visit site
✟30,613.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Once again, the dog is still a dog and the sow still a sow. Is there any indication they were ever one of Christ's? His people aren't called dogs and sows. One can escape the pollution of the world and know the way of righteousnes by being around Christ or other Christians. That doesn't make them Christian. Here we have people who have knowledge about Christ, and maybe for awhile follow the Christian crowd and learn about the way of righteousness. Maybe even get outwardly cleaned up a bit for awhile. But does anything here say that they actually accepted the gospel, that they actually repented an believed on Christ? That they were born again? No it says they turned away from the way way of righteousness they were being shown and the dog went back to his vomit and the sow to her wallowing in the mire. These aren't saved people imho.
 
Upvote 0

stone

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 7, 2005
13,055
491
Everywhere
✟99,127.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
hoser said:
There is NO WHERE in scripture that says we are saved by "faith alone" except in James 2:24 You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. Faith alone was made up by Martin Luther and was never believed in the first 1500 years.

You seem to have a misconception of Martin Luther. I understand that Martin Luther explained to the people that they do not need to pay money to be saved. That they do not need to pay to receive a piece of paper that reserves the spot for a loved one in heaven and that they do not need to pay money to walk up and kiss a million steps to the top of a building or whatever to be saved by Jesus.

This work by Martin Luther greatly reduced the amount of money the vatican was receiveing from Germany and it angered the cardinals and the pope. This could also explain some of the separation of the christian faith from the catholic church.
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

How would you reason that they "escaped the pollutions of the world" if they were not saved?

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Hey Hoser,

First of all, Lutherans do not believe in OSAS. And it is by Grace through faith that we are saved and this not of ourselves. It is the gift of God, not by works so that no one can boast. This verse says that we can not come out and say that because of a specific work that we do we will get to heaven, but rather by God's grace through faith in Christ's work on the cross. through this work we are now his workmanship and our faith mandates that Good works be done to give God the glory.

This verse as you so correctly put it does not point to faith alone but to who gets the glory for it. It is certainly not us, but God.
 
Upvote 0
H

hoser

Guest

SlStrohkirch, yes I know that Lutherans do NOT believe in OSAS. That was part of my question at the end of my post. "Why do many many protestants NOT believe in OSAS?" Because I knew that Lutherans, Methodists, Anglicans, etc. do not hold to that belief. I am still waiting to here the reason from OSAS believers why it is that so many of their Christian brothers and sisters do not believe in OSAS.
 
Upvote 0

msortwell

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2004
1,245
147
66
Gibson, Wisconsin
✟206,906.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Melethiel said:
I'm curious what the OSAS people make of these verses:

[bible]Hebrews 6:4-6[/bible]

Or even the rest of Hebrews...

Well . . . to be precise I don't hold to OSAS. Rather, I believe in what is labeled, the perseverance of the saints. That is, God will surely preserve those whom He has saved.

But, to actually address the verses that you cited . . . There are two possible explanations.

First, the most popular, is that the Author was speaking in a type of hyperbole. That is, he was expounding in an extreme fashion (beyond that which is actually possible and/or reflective of reality) to emphasize his point. Those holding this view sometimes point to verse 9 to indicate that the author was not speaking of an actual possibility.

Heb 6:9
9 But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak. KJV

Like my Arminian brothers, I find this explanation unsatisfying. However, I would offer you a better explanation. First it is noted that there are no explicit claims within verses 4-6 that we are speaking of any that are justified by the blood of Christ. Nothing explicit is stated that we are speaking of saved people. Nor is it necessary that these verses are speaking of individuals. Rather, the verses consistently employ language that could be referring to a group of people as a unit. This is important because these verses may be referring to an apostate church. They may be referring to a church that was once made up of the redeemed but which, over time, fell away. Godly men (redeemed men) were no longer to be found in their midst. Where the whole counsel of God was once taught, there is now only the tickling of itching ears. Whereas, an individual may never be so lost that he is beyond redemption. It may be that this text is teaching us that a church that has completely turned away from the truth cannot be brought to repentance.

msortwell
 
Reactions: nephilimiyr
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

It's just that many Lutherans do not consider themselves to be protestant anymore. Many of us are very Orthodox and confessional. Some even consider us to be Catholics without papal authority.
 
Upvote 0

vanshan

A Sinner
Mar 5, 2004
3,982
345
53
✟28,268.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
SLStrohkirch said:
It's just that many Lutherans do not consider themselves to be protestant anymore. Many of us are very Orthodox and confessional. Some even consider us to be Catholics without papal authority.


No, we're the ones normally seen as Catholics without a pope! Maybe you can been seen as the most Catholic of protestants.
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
vanshan said:
No, we're the ones normally seen as Catholics without a pope! Maybe you can been seen as the most Catholic of protestants.

Sorry I wasn't clear about that. I meant to say that some among ourselves consider us to be Evangelical Catholics. The word "Protestant" leaves a bad taste in the mouth if you know what I mean. Luther was excommunicated for his stands against the Pope. He didn't leave voluntarily and if you look at much of his teaching it is still very Catholic in nature.
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

"Protestant" still means protesting against Papal Authority. Why would you wish to rid yourself of this proper label?

Is it now being seen as protesting against God?

I see it as an effort toward righteousness, albeit mislead, because IMHO the Protestants should have returned to the Orthodox Church instead of attempting to "go it alone".

Forgive me...
 
Upvote 0

SPALATIN

Lifetime friend of Dr. Luther
May 5, 2004
4,905
139
64
Fort Wayne, Indiana
✟28,351.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I think it has more to do with our disagreement with other protestants over things like the confessions and sacraments than anything. If anything we were the "True" protestants and true Evangelicals and everyone else borrowed from us. They, however, didn't adapt our views on these things but rather came up with their own interpretations.

To understand why Luther did not establish himself with the Eastern Orthodox faith is found in the Tubingen theologians arguments. I have heard though that it had more to do with the distance from the Orthodox headquarters than it did with their theology.
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

IMHO ~ Luther would have made an outstanding EO, and if he could have stayed in the Vatican Church would have made an excellent Pope (head Bishop), and may possibly been able to rectify some of the strain between the Vatican and EO.

IMHO

Forgive me....
 
Upvote 0

OrthodoxyUSA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 6, 2004
25,292
2,868
61
Tupelo, MS
Visit site
✟187,274.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
BTW ~ On the subject of OSAS..... some of our readers may be interested in The Shepherd of Hermas. I believe it is a window into the beliefs of the early Christians.

Forgive me....
 
Upvote 0

BlueRose

Active Member
Mar 14, 2004
258
7
✟443.00
Faith
Non-Denom

So when many people believe something, it must make it true? The earth must have certainly been flat then, when most of the world believed so!

As humans, we want to take the credit for a lot of stuff. How powerful is Christ's blood, may I ask? So many people think that they are somehow in charge. But where do we draw the line? At what point it someone "cut off" and no longer saved? Is it like a yo-yo.... one year saved, unsaved... saved, unsaved? I know many people who go through phases of backsliding, sometimes even throwing it aside all together for a while. To lose salvation almost makes me picture God dangling a carrot in front of us, with us chasing it around just to make sure not to lose it.

Why is it also that in a number of 'traditional' churches, many people don't even bring their bibles along? Being originally from a somewhat rural area, I would say 90% of the churches were like that. And I'm relying upon these people to fill the majority in dictating a train of thought?

Most Christians in the nation could probably be categorized as "lay people." Many read their Bible on occassion, but often the majority of what they believe has just been told to them by a pastor or two. Or they just assume something and don't really question any further. It's "logical" that turning from God would take away salvation, so why not believe it? It's also logical though, that God would not actually come to earth as a mere human to be killed. Many people haven't researched or studied the scripture very closely. Hermeneutics is what drives a person's study of the Bible--and many probably don't even know what that entails.

So anyway, after my long winded response, I just want to say that just because a big group of people believes something, it no more makes it true than me sitting in a garage makes me a car.
 
Upvote 0

Singinman

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
56
3
83
Virginia
✟191.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Most of the OSAS folks I know use this doctrine as a kind of litmus test of theology believe this or be damned.

I do not believe this because I pay attention to the message of the whole Bible.

First it is noted that there are no explicit claims within verses 4-6 that we are speaking of any that are justified by the blood of Christ. Nothing explicit is stated that we are speaking of saved people. (sorry I did not do the quote thing right)

Heb 6:4 sounds like a good discription of a "born again Christian" to me. If there is any doubt here, I think Heb 10:29 clarifies it.

"How much worse punishment do you think will be diserved by those who have spurned the Son of God, profaned the blood of the covenant by which they were sanctified and outraged the Spirit of Grace."

We are talking here about real saved persons. And their souls are in danger.

I know a lot of people who wish the Book of Hebrews had been left on the cutting room floor.
 
Upvote 0

Melethiel

Miserere mei, Domine
Site Supporter
Jun 8, 2005
27,287
940
35
Ohio
✟99,593.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Why is it also that in a number of 'traditional' churches, many people don't even bring their bibles along?

Because we have, as part of the service, extensive readings from the Old Testament, Epistles, Gospels (always), and sometimes the Psalms as well. Seeing as the sermon is based directly on these readings, there is no need to be flipping pages. Also, the very words of the liturgy are often directly based on Scripture.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
BlueRose said:
So anyway, after my long winded response, I just want to say that just because a big group of people believes something, it no more makes it true than me sitting in a garage makes me a car.
Which is why in the history of the Church we can see several cases of a minority, sometimes just a single, lone Bishop, stands up against the majority to uphold the truth.
 
Upvote 0
H

hoser

Guest

My whole point in asking why so many protestants do NOT believe in OSAS is the common belief in "sola scriptura" and that the Bible, they believe is their ONLY authority in matters of faith and morals. Protestants don't need a church to interpret scriptures correctly they say. They can do it all on their own if they ask the Holy Spirit for guidance, or follow a particular pastor with his own particular viewpoint on what scripture says.

Sorry, but OSAS, whatever side you are on, is NOT a trivial matter. I have seen how some protestants use the excuse that protestants all agree on the "essential" matters. How can whether or not our salvation is absolutely guarenteed, NOT be an "essential" matter of faith?

How can one protestants personal interpretation of the Bible be incorrect and the other's be correct whey they are all following the same "sola scriptura" concept, and all asking the Holy Spirit for guidance? Both sides are using the Bible as their "sole authority". So how does this major division amongst protestants be reconciled? Both sides say their interpretation is the correct interpretation based on the Bible and the Bible alone. Well OSAS is either true or it is NOT true. One or the other, it cannot be both, and it cannot be inbetween.

It is amazing how this "sole authority" can create such a major devisive issue with absolutely no way to solve it, because in the "sola scriptura" believers mind their is no other authority.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.