• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Once Saved Always Saved - Why is it so hard?

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,009
788
Visit site
✟131,193.00
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is not God good?
Should not His people be good because He lives within them?
Yes, of course. I am in full agreement with this.

Why is everyone seeking justification in doing the wrong thing instead of the right thing with God?
I think that's not what everyone is doing in this thread.

Look, I find myself somewhat in the middle here. I don't believe in OSAS, but I don't believe you lose salvation by sin.

With that disclaimer aside, let me get at what I think is bothering everyone. I'll do that below.

Yes. There's nothing really to disagree with here.

You see what's bothering everyone is that Christianity is for the losers, not the winners. That's what we see in the scriptures and in church history. When people grasp this fact about the Gospel, revival happens. Yet there is a particular brand of Christianity these days that basically preaches that Christianity is for the winners - those who are amazing at everything they do, are winning at life, carry a big smile, and are able to effortlessly just say no to every temptation that comes their way. And let's not forget they are financially prosperous too, have pretty wives, and perfect kids.

This brand of Christianity teaches that if you just follow the commands of God, you will receive blessing and be a winner. And everyone can just follow the commands of God. This is, in theological history, is known as Pelagianism.

But the problem with this brand of Christianity is it always ends up being a farce. The modern heroes of the faith who seem to have it all and do it all and conquer it all end up being revealed as fakes, with multiple affairs, money swindling, course joking, and all the stuff you preach so vehemently against.

But Christianity is, at its heart, much more honest and down-to-earth. It claims that we are all sinners and in the same boat, and self-effort leads to only hypocrisy.

Some guys think that it's better to be a Pelagian than an Antinomian. But both are heresies. Most Christian denominations and traditions reject Pelagianism, at least on paper. Some, like the Eastern Orthodox, admit they're semi-pelagian. Credit to them for admitting it. However, true Arminianism (you are an Arminian, right?) is not Pelagian or semi-Pelagian. If you count yourself an Arminian and are semi-Pelagian, you are not in line with classical Arminianism.

Now, I don't believe anyone in this thread believes a Christian should live an unrighteous life. What is in question is to what degree your works count towards your eternal destiny. I don't think anyone here is really all that bothered about your statements encouraging Christians to stop sinning and live righteously, but what bothers people here is (1) how you emphasize that over the other aspects of the Gospel and (2) how this emphasis downplays grace to the degree that works are above it.

I only say this to do what I believe I can to help you communicate in a way so you don't have to get frustrated. My work as a writer and journalist helps me to actually hear what people are actually saying behind what they are saying. I think much of what you say, or is on your heart, is spot-on, but the issue is how you're saying it and what you are emphasizing. You would go a great deal further in your ministry if you would systematically find where you agree so that you can deal with the actual disagreements, otherwise you're simply blasting shotgun shells into the wind.

With all that aside, and I hope you hear my heart in that response, I'll respond to the detail of your recent post to me and your other post in the next hour or so. (No idea where you find the time to formulate such long responses, but well done.)
 
Reactions: ToBeLoved
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Did you read what I had written or did you glaze over it, my friend?
Did you truly seek to consider that maybe I was right?
I did not see you give a response to the verses I posted. Intead, I seen you go off in another direction.

Sure, you can look at Christians thru out history who taught holiness as being hypocrites, but that does not mean you are God to know of all Christians everywhere who taught holiness. We walk by faith and not by sight or by looking at our neighbor. There are always going to be fakes; And people even use this as an excuse to not become a Christian. But that would not be faith, though. We have to trust God by His Word in what it says.

If somebody is seeking to do what is right, they will not make excuses to disobey God's Word in even the smallest way but they will seek to obey it and promote such a thing. God's standards of righteousness might seem difficult to people, but the righteousness we do is not something by our own power but by the power of the Lord working within us.

As for Arminianism: Well, I do not believe in "Arminianism." I believe in the position known as:

"Semi-Pelagianism." Theopedia defines Semi Pelagianism as,

"Semi-Pelaginism acknowledges that man's will and nature are somewhat affected (injured) by the Fall, but mankind retains libertarian free will. The end result is essentially the same as the Arminian view -- the difference being free will "by nature" rather than by the Arminian's universal prevenient grace. In Semi-Pelagianism, man has a free will essentially unaffected by the fall and not limited by his natural desires, inclinations, or prior dispositions. By way of reference, Pelagianism says man's will (and nature) is not affected at all by the Fall."

Source:
Free will | Theopedia

Anyways, may God bless you.
And may you please be well.


...
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Please read the end of my post above - I said I would respond to your other things in an hour or so

Sorry, I did not catch that.
Thank you for telling me.

Oh, and I updated my last reply to you to say this,

"If somebody is seeking to do what is right, they will not make excuses to disobey God's Word in even the smallest way but they will seek to obey it and promote such a thing. God's standards of righteousness might seem difficult to people, but the righteousness we do is not something by our own power but by the power of the Lord working within us."

But adding (even more to that):

For me if God sets the bar of doing good at a certain level, and yet people set their standards lower than that and they are saying they are doing good, I have no doubt that in their minds they think they are trying to do good, but the reality is they are not truly doing the good in what God desires. Full obedience. We have to sell ourselves out to Jesus. Does that mean there is no mercy or grace if we slip up and repent? No. It just means that we have to be truly on fire for Jesus and truly thankful for what He has done for us by the life that we live. That is one of the reasons why many of God's commands are attached with dire consequences if they are disobeyed. God wants our entire heart and He doesn't just want a tiny little speck or piece of it.

Even some unbelievers have a code of ethics and in doing good. But does that mean they are doing what is truly righteous and good according to God's Word? No. What sets us apart from them? Simply a belief? But if Jesus truly is living in a person's life, should not their life be transformed in such a way that is noticably different from the outside world?


...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Again, the problem I have is that you seeked to justify what appears to be at first glance a negative aspect of Matthew 5:19 and you did not seek to justify or defend in doing the good within that verse. This is a huge problem for me. If one is good, they will always want to do good, no matter what. Nobody should ever try and justify in doing the wrong thing or in breaking even the smallest of God's Commands. Why? Because the breaking of God's Commands or Laws is .... sin (1 John 3:4).


...
 
Upvote 0

HatGuy

Some guy in a hat
Jun 9, 2014
1,009
788
Visit site
✟131,193.00
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Jason -

Please note, that if I'm going to respond in detail to your scriptures, I really do expect there to be a mutual honouring in you not just pasting a dozen more scriptures before discussing those at hand.

As you suggested, why don't we pick 2 or 3 from the OT and NT from your list and discuss those.

Sin is separation from God:

Isaiah 59:2

But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.

The whole of Isaiah 59 shows that, despite this, God still reaches in and saves. Those who repent, he saves.

Verse 20, 21: "The Redeemer will come to Zion,
to those in Jacob who repent of their sins,”
declares the Lord.
21 “As for me, this is my covenant with them,” says the Lord. “My Spirit, who is on you, will not depart from you, and my words that I have put in your mouth will always be on your lips, on the lips of your children and on the lips of their descendants—from this time on and forever,” says the Lord."

We've established in a previous post that we're both in semi-agreement about repentance, that it is necessary. But this scripture does not show that sin sends people to hell. In fact, what it shows is that God will come in wrath against those who do wrong to encourage them to repent. That means it is not speaking of the eternal judgement. It is a remedial judgement for the sake of encouraging repentance.

Much of God's judgement against Israel in the O.T. is remedial - it encourages repentance. He sent them to Babylon so they would repent.

Micah 3:4
Then shall they cry unto the LORD, but he will not hear them: he will even hide his face from them at that time, as they have behaved themselves in an evil way in their deeds.
Micah 4 then moves into a promise of salvation.

"6 “In that day,” declares the Lord,

“I will gather the lame;
I will assemble the exiles
and those I have brought to grief.
7 I will make the lame my remnant,
those driven away a strong nation.
The Lord will rule over them in Mount Zion
from that day and forever.
8 As for you, watchtower of the flock,
stronghold of Daughter Zion,
the former dominion will be restored to you;
kingship will come to Daughter Jerusalem.”

See - God brought them to grief and then restores them. The bringing of them to grief was for the purposes of repentance and restoration. But still, we're dealing with the nation of Israel here, we're not dealing with individuals and their eternal destiny.

.
And then he restores them. He does not hide his face forever.

There's a clear theme throughout the Old Testament that God's wrath is remedial and for the purposes of restoration, yet his love and acceptance of Israel is never broken. We can say that sin separates, but not forever, because God always finds a way to bring people to restoration and repentance.

Luke 13:3

I tell you, Nay: but, except you repent, you shall all likewise perish.
Now we're starting to get closer to individual salvation. Yes, unless you repent, you will perish. But you have not established that sin leads a Christian to hell with this scripture, as repentance in this context leads to regeneration, and regeneration means the sinner has become contrite and always in repentance. (It is a 'baptism of repentance' to show that people are living in that repentance).

John 3:20

"For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved."
Let's quote this one in context.

16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.

What is the 'truth' we are to live by? It's clear as day: that Jesus is God's one and only Son. And that we are to believe this and Jesus himself. Then, whoever believes, has eternal life.

What Jesus is saying is clear: the light exposes the darkness, but you must come into it anyway, and then when it is exposed you must believe to be saved.

John 9:31 ESV

We know that God does not listen to sinners, but if anyone is a worshiper of God and does his will, God listens to him.
You've quoted the blind man that was healed, not Jesus.

From verse 30:
30 The man answered, “Now that is remarkable! You don’t know where he comes from, yet he opened my eyes. 31 We know that God does not listen to sinners. He listens to the godly person who does his will. 32 Nobody has ever heard of opening the eyes of a man born blind. 33 If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.”

34 To this they replied, “You were steeped in sin at birth; how dare you lecture us!” And they threw him out.


The man is reminding them of what they believe, not what Jesus teaches.

This is the issue with posting tons of scriptures but not actually considering their context. It's a shotgun approach with very little value. It's far better to slow down and use the scriptures effectively - quality rather than quantity in this case.

Now it is my turn to quote some scripture

Hebrews 6:
6 Therefore we must progress beyond the elementary instructions about Christ and move on to maturity, not laying this foundation again: repentance from dead works and faith in God, 2 teaching about baptisms, laying on of hands, resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. 3 And this is what we intend to do, if God permits. 4 For it is impossible in the case of those who have once been enlightened, tasted the heavenly gift, become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 tasted the good word of God and the miracles of the coming age, 6 and then have committed apostasy, to renew them again to repentance, since they are crucifying the Son of God for themselves all over again and holding him up to contempt.

This (rather famous) scripture clearly says that it is apostasy that stops them from being renewed to repentance, not sin. It is the abandonment of faith, not sin, that makes repentance impossible.

See, I believe repentance is necessary and is given by God, and we've established this between us as a semi-agreement. God always allows repentance from sin, but if you abandon the faith willingly, knowingly, after having experienced and known its full benefits, then you are beyond repentance. But that is all that's mentioned in this scripture. How else would you interpret it?

Romans 11:

7 Now if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, were grafted in among them and participated in the richness of the olive root, 18 do not boast over the branches. But if you boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 Then you will say, “The branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” 20 Granted! They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but fear! 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, perhaps he will not spare you. 22 Notice therefore the kindness and harshness of God—harshness toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness toward you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you also will be cut off. 23 And even they—if they do not continue in their unbelief—will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24 For if you were cut off from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these natural branches be grafted back into their own olive tree?

It's clear that what keeps us from being cut off is not sin but standing by faith, continuing in God's kindness. There is nothing, and I repeat, nothing here that shows sin cuts you off from God. In fact, the very opposite: you must continue in God's kindness (his grace) otherwise you can be cut off. How else would you interpret it?

I would appreciate you providing some sort of answer to these scriptures as I have tried to provide some sort of answer to yours.

I don't have a podcast, nor any videos. Currently, I just write here, my friend.
Granted, one day I would like to do videos (in the upcoming future).
Sorry, I thought you were Jason Hardin. I copied and pasted something on your scripture list and he came up.

No disagreement here in principle.

Here your semi-Pelagian tendencies are clear

Humans do not have the capacity to choose God or do righteous works of any kind (their righteous works are spoiled by bad motivations etc.) before God, in his grace, invites them to his kingdom.

In other words, human beings have no true free will until God frees the will to either accept or reject him. They cannot choose to do good, they always are doing evil, even when they try to do good.

This is clear from the Biblical witness.

Ephesians 2
And although you were dead in your transgressions and sins, 2 in which you formerly lived according to this world’s present path, according to the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the ruler of the spirit that is now energizing the sons of disobedience, 3 among whom all of us also formerly lived out our lives in the cravings of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and the mind, and were by nature children of wrath even as the rest…

4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of his great love with which he loved us, 5 even though we were dead in transgressions, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you are saved!— 6 and he raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus, 7 to demonstrate in the coming ages the surpassing wealth of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8 For by grace you are saved through faith, and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 it is not from works, so that no one can boast. 10 For we are his workmanship, having been created in Christ Jesus for good works that God prepared beforehand so we may do them.


You, I, we're all DEAD in our transgressions. But God made us alive.

This is a fundamental theological point you need to consider strongly. Semi-pelagianism is not a gospel at all but simply digresses into a powerless moralism. If you truly want to see Christians living righteous lives, you will never achieve it via semi-pelagianism. History and the scriptures is testimony to that absolute fact.

Agreed. There must be some change at some point. At least here you are not being semi-pelagian. Phew!

This is excellent - God does the work through you. Now we're talking Gospel!

This was a very good answer, thank you, I didn't think of that!

Brilliant. We agree. And this is not semi-pelagianism (phew again!)

Disagree. Jesus shows us that sin starts in the heart - which you've agreed to before. The eating of the fruit of knowledge gave them knowledge of good and evil, alright, and made them realize what it was they had just done! They had desired to be like God, and would never reach his righteousness, so they cover themselves. The actual sin took place when "the woman saw that the tree produced fruit that was good for food, was attractive to the eye, and was desirable for making one wise." When she believed the serpent and desired to be 'like God', the eating of the fruit was the natural outcome.

If you want to still go with your theology that the sin only happened when they ate, then you will have to be consistent: meaning, all sins are only sins when there is action, but so long as you harbor it in your heart or mull over it, you are not sinning. Jesus, however, has a different opinion.

Okay, no problem - I think this is right, we must have faith in his words on what he has commanded but ALSO have faith in his words that what he has commanded HE WILL DO THROUGH US.

What do you mean by faith? Faith in what? Where do we get faith from? How is that faith lived out?

I would say that we have faith in Jesus and His Word always.
.
Agreed. I would say faith in his word, faith in his grace, faith in his promises to make us clean to fulfil those commands he gives.

Woohoo, praise God. Agreed!

Brilliant. This, to me, is the right emphasis.

Well, Scripture repeatedly says that certain sins can cause one to go to hell or to lose their salvation. Please carefully read these verses and do not dismiss them out of hand.
I addressed some above. But let's address one or two here as well.


Jesus also says this:

John 6:28,29
"28 So then they said to him, “What must we do to accomplish the deeds [works] God requires?” 29 Jesus replied, “This is the deed [work] God requires—to believe in the one whom he sent.”

You have to reconcile this with the sermon on the mount and Jesus' other teachings. How do you reconcile it?


Yes, we keep his word. It goes both ways. If you love him, you will keep his commandments (meaning, by loving him you are able to keep them). And if you keep them, you know you love him. Still, what I have been getting at, is the way you keep them is through faith.

Again - John 6:28,29 above. The question they are asking is HOW do we accomplish the works God requires? The answer is to believe Jesus. From there, it flows naturally.

As for Arminianism: Well, I do not believe in "Arminianism." I believe in the position known as: "Semi-Pelagianism."
Then there is much to discuss, as I believe this is a faulty view, based on the Word of God.

I've spent over an hour (almost two, I think) compiling this response. I would appreciate more effective responses to the actual issues at hand so we both don't have to spend hours on end on the Internet.

Blessings!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I like this. Oh Lord, let me sell myself completely to you!

I have no disagreements with the rest of that post.
I don't have to sell myself out completely to Jesus.

Jesus bought me with His blood and paid a very big price for me. Otherwise His blood is not enough.
 
Upvote 0

stuart lawrence

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2015
10,527
1,627
67
✟86,135.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You get rewarded in heaven for the good you do on this earth/ works. But you are not declared righteous by those works, but faith in Christ. So if you do hardly any works you get hardly any reward, then you are least in the kingdom of heaven. Hence matt5:19
And if anyone gives even a cup of cold water to one of these little ones because he I my disciple, I tell you the truth, he will certainly not lose his reward
Matt 10:42
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
42,760
13,592
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟865,650.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

That's how I understood it too. Christ's gift to us is Salvation from damnation, and enters us into the Kingdom of Heaven. Our position there and our rewards depends on what we do in addition to receiving Christ's salvation. That explains why He used the term "Shall be least in the kingdom". He didn't say they'd be cast out of the Kingdom.
 
Upvote 0

supescritter

Active Member
Nov 6, 2015
73
35
54
✟26,596.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

I am not standing by OSAS. I am merely explaining how to move past the stalemate. I am still very interested in learning your point of view. But notice the difference between my approach and the approach of most others on this thread. Rather than trying to advance my own point of view, I am trying to learn the other point of view to ensure I understand it fully. There are many things I don't understand about the non-OSAS point of view, and these will hopefully be addressed in your private post.

Every time you give me your point of view, I will question it because I want to clarify it. It is not because I want to convince you or anybody else that you're wrong. That's the difference in my approach. I want to learn fully your perspective.

I don't want to talk about the Catholic list any more, because you don't understand why I bring it up, so my point is lost. My point is that if we believe that those 6 sins will send you to hell, then you will have to come up with a REMINDER list of things that will cause you to fail those 6 sins.

For example:
1. did you lose your temper on the road today?
2. did you look lustfully at a co-worker today?
etc.

This is what the Catholic list looks like - it's a practical REMINDER list of common things that people do. That's all. I am not prescribing Catholic practices, but merely indicating that if those 6 sins send you to hell, then it behooves us to write down every thing we MIGHT have done during a day so we can repent of them. That seems like a PRACTICAL thing to do if you believe those 6 sins can send you to hell if you don't repent. The point is the LIST, but you are getting hung up on the "Catholic" part which is irrelevant. I mentioned "Catholic" because they have a list that you can Google - I can't find another comparable list. But instead of focusing on "list" you get hung up on "Catholic" so miss the point. This is the last time I want to talk about the Catholic list, because we are wasting time discussing something completely irrelevant to the discussion.

Please proceed to answer my questions in the private post, because I would really love to learn from you. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Okay. I will give you my best reply possible by God's power of course.

Just give me some time.

May God bless you.
And please be well.


...
 
Upvote 0

supescritter

Active Member
Nov 6, 2015
73
35
54
✟26,596.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
May I present a thought for everyone?

Clearly this is very difficult and controversial theology. Clearly there are two sides who hold very strong and opposite views.

The OSAS side believes that there are verses, which when read without context, seem to clearly indicate we are saved by faith and faith alone independent of any other righteousness. Taking these verses to heart, they then use a "cannot lose salvation" presupposition to interpret verses that seem to indicate Christians can go to hell.

The non-OSAS side believes that there are verses, which when read without context, seem to clearly indicate that after accepting Jesus, some sins can send us to hell - thus we can lose salvation if we persist in them or die before we repent of them. Taking these verses to heart, they then use a "can lose salvation" presupposition to interpret the verses that seem to indicate we are saved by faith alone.

Both sides cannot be correct. The reason why I tend to side with OSAS is because every other religion is like the non-OSAS side in a practical sense. The muslims pray for forgiveness in the same way as what non-OSAS believers say we must do to keep our salvation (see: How to repent from sins and ask for Allah’s forgiveness ).

What has made Christianity so special to me is that I believed my relationship with God does not depend on what I've done, but what Jesus has done for me, therefore I love God and I'm free to worship him through works - NOT for salvation - but out of love. If I am to pray for forgiveness for not doing the right works because if I don't I will go to hell, that robs me of the joy of my works - I want to do works because I love God, not because I will lose salvation if I don't. No longer am I obeying God because I love him alone, I am obeying God out of fear of losing salvation - precisely the motivation of the muslim and other religious people. Christianity would lose it's uniqueness. However - just because believing in non-OSAS robs Christianity of its uniqueness/power, doesn't mean that non-OSAS is false. Truth is truth - if we can REALLY lose our salvation, then it is a fact of life that we must live with whether we like it or not. How i feel about it is irrelevant.

Personally I feel like I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, either I believe OSAS and possibly risk going to hell for wrong theology (and evidently more than 50% of people responding to this thread are believing the wrong thing too), or I believe I can lose salvation and I am robbed of my joy of doing works for love of God rather than for avoidance of hell.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

stuart lawrence

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2015
10,527
1,627
67
✟86,135.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In the second example of the parable of the sower, people accepted the message with joy, they believed and set out on the christian path, but then walked away from the faith. Are you in a saved state if you set out on the Christian path?
In the third example they become christians but are constantly sidetracked by lifes, worries, riches and pleasures. They do not leave the faith but do not mature in it.

You mature by practising right from wrong.

So one group walked away, while the other remained.

What was different about the people who remained but never matured in the faith?
Why did they not leave also, and why were they not rejected?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

stuart lawrence

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2015
10,527
1,627
67
✟86,135.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm sure you know which works God wants when the choice is either doing them out of love for God, or to avoid hell.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Can a person love God if their sole motivation for being a christian is to avoid hell?

Can a person love God if they believe the removal of a law of righteousness is an excuse to sin as much as they want?

"The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction." (Proverbs 1:7).

"And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the Lord, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding" (Job 28:28).

"...perfect love casteth out fear..." (1 John 4:18).

In other words, a person first comes to the Lord in fear until they learn to walk perfectly before God. For perfect love (i.e. walking in His good ways) will cast out fear.


...
 
Upvote 0

stuart lawrence

Well-Known Member
Oct 21, 2015
10,527
1,627
67
✟86,135.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In other words, a person first comes to the Lord in fear until they learn to walk perfectly before God. For perfect love (i.e. walking in His good ways) will cast out fear.


...

Then you don't love God Jason do you, just fear him.

Your beliefs now make perfect sense
 
Upvote 0