- Feb 10, 2013
- 31,876
- 18,934
- 29
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Celibate
- Politics
- US-Republican
Thanks for the input.As was Judas', there faith was counterfeit, they were not born again.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
Thanks for the input.As was Judas', there faith was counterfeit, they were not born again.
It is exactly that. People who claim salvation can be lost are saying Christ has not done enough for them on the cross.Nonsense. By saying salvation can be lost means you are not ignoring the fact that we have responsibility in salvation as Calvinists like you do. Our responsibility is not to do works to earn our salvation, but rather to humble ourselves before God while submitting to Him and acknowledging that we are sinners who can't save ourselves and instead need His provision for us.
Hebrews 3:12-14 speaks nothing of losing of salvation.Hebrews 3:12 See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14 We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.
John 19:30 When Jesus had received the sour wine, he said, “It is finished,” and he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.No it's not.
Chapter 12 verse 1, Genesis: “the Lord said to Abram, ‘Go forth from your country, from your relatives And from your father’s house, To the land which I will show you; And I will make you a great nation, And I will bless you, And make your name great; And so you shall be a blessing; And I will bless those who bless you, And the one who curses you I will curse. And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.’” That is what is known as the Abrahamic covenant. What strikes you, first of all, is the little verbal phrase, “I will” five times, five times. “I will show you, I will make you, I will bless you, I will bless, I will curse - I will, I will, I will, I will, I will” - this isn’t some kind of agreement between God and Abram; this is unilateral and unconditional and sovereign. God is simply saying “This is what I will do: I will make you into a great nation, I will bless you, make your name great, you will then become a blessing, I will bless those that bless you, curse those that curse you, and in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.” There are no ifs, ands, or buts, right? There’s no caveats; that’s why we call it an unconditional covenant. It is an unconditional promise. It is unilateral. It is given by a sovereign, who has all authority and all power.You have entered into a relationship with Jesus, and if you are not going to do your part to keep it fresh everyday with Him, you can't expect Jesus to just drag you along with those that have.
Hebrews 10 does not teach that salvation can be lost.So many people trying to deny that a born again believer can walk away from The Lord, when it is specifically stated in the book of Hebrews that it can happen.
1 John 1:8 is true...for those walking in darkness.Is 1 Jn 1:18 true or false?
Nah. He did His job, for all. Now it's up to us to care.Christ said 'it is finished' not it will be finished. The Greek word in the text is 'tetelestei'. Tetelstei was a stamp in time of Jesus that was stamped on an invoice when a debt was paid in full. That is exactly what happened on the cross. The debt was paid in full for all the true believers in Christ, both OT & NT. And because the debt was paid in full, there no longer is a debt for a believer, because Christ purchased Him on the cross. Therefore you cannot lose your salvation.
Speaking of taxes, I need to do mine in the next couple days. I'll give you the last word on Catholic doctrine. Thanks for engaging again.We have to understand the Fall of man from the correct perspective first of all. Man did not become some kind of "sin machine" with a new nature as if something was added to him. Rather he lost something, he lost his vital connection to his Creator in a bid for autonomy from Him. And with that he lost moral continency. Adam literally got what he wanted, freedom from the moral authority of God. We're here to come to learn to freely accept that authority now, as we come to recognize and acknowledge our need for it after all, for Him, 'apart from whom we can do nothing', That's what being born again is all about, to be reconciled with and returned back to God.
Sin doesn't turn us away from God; we turn away as evidenced by our sin that attracts us away from the true Good, "tempted when they are dragged away by their own evil desire and enticed", James 1. We fail to put God first above all else. And that kind of sin and the selfishness and hatred it implies erodes our love even more. It's a slavery.
The will remains a player until our love is so complete that we simply never will or choose foolishly, against His will, again. If Adam possessed that love in Eden he never would've disobeyed but in God's wise economy that love, in order to even be true love, is a chosen thing, a process that's embraced, cultivated, and grown in as we come to know and embrace Him, turning away from sin and the temporary offerings of this world, even as that love is also a gift from Him to begin with. And that love, and the struggle with and the turning away from sin that opposes it, with the testing and refinement involved in this process, is God's ultimate creative plan for bringing us to our very purpose, our telos, the reason we were created as it transforms us increasingly into His image. Love is man's righteousness, his justice, as the Source of that love is our righteousness.
Yes, and like I said, we'd have to throw out a large portion of the bible in order to believe otherwise.
Any position that says that we can sin and still expect to make it into heaven minimizes sin. That's what "simul justus et peccator" effectively amounts to, for instance. In Catholicism, God doesn't necessarily expect us to be absolutely perfect in this life, even as perfection is the utlimate goal. We receive a final purification in the next life in Catholic teaching, if we haven't so rejected God and His ways by our actions in this life that we prove we have no desire and love for Him at all. We need to look at this honestly and practically. If two people walked into the room and one had just stolen from the cookie jar or fudged on his taxes while the other had just tortured and killed another person, which would you want to hang out with more, and which do you think might be closer to God?
Love and sin are mutually exclusive, which is why "love fulfills the law". Love is true righteousness.
I never denied for a moment that all sin is unrighteousness-saying only that some sin strikes at and offends againt love much more directly and radically such that a radical change of heart has occured requiring a radical metanoia and repentance all over again. But we mock God if we think His Son sacrificed Himself for forgiveness only, and not also for the purpose of actually restoring true justice/righteous to and within us now-so that along with being forgiven we'll 'go, and sin no more', even if that sanctity is a process that is worked out as we work our salvation and make our calling and election sure. We grow nearer to and more in love with God-and sin grows further away at the same time. That's the path we must be on. Some, having lived extremely sinful lives, have experienced such dramatic conversions that they reject sin all at once, more completely than others -but I guarantee that the battle, the struggle of choosing between good and evil, still goes on for them too, to one degree or another.
The awkwardness stems from thinking that all sins past, present, and future are automatcailly forgiven for no other reason than that one believes, without the overcoming of sin also being part of the "equation". Heck, unless change, inducing our reciprocal love, takes place in us we won't be forgiven:
"For if you forgive other people when they sin against you, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others their sins, your Father will not forgive your sins." Matt 6:14-15
The awkardness and ambiguity reside in thinking that egregious sin should exclude one from being a child of God to begin with while accepting milder sins as not excluding him- and then objecting to that very idea when it's spelled out in practical terms by church doctrine. Or in thinking that all sins are forgiven only by belief, such that the answer to the question, 'can a person persistently engaging in rape, torture, and murder still expect to enter heaven as long as they believe?', becomes problematic- and answered in a variety of often conflicting ways.
Glad I could help in some little waySpeaking of taxes, I need to do mine in the next couple days. I'll give you the last word on Catholic doctrine. Thanks for engaging again.
It amazes me how many Christians don't understand the cross.Nah. He did His job, for all. Now it's up to us to care.
I don’t accept penal substitution. God the Father is not a monster, nor do I accept Calvinism. I don’t find it biblical or historically accurate.It amazes me how many Christians don't understand the cross.
- He triumphed over Satan (Colossians 2:15) – Christus Victor
- He set us an example (1 Peter 2:21) – Moral Influence
- He reconciled us to God (Romans 5:10) – Reconciliation
- He ransomed us (Mark 10:45) – Redemption
- He satisfied divine justice and bore our punishment – Penal Substitution (Isaiah 53:5–6, Romans 3:24–26, Galatians 3:13, 1 Peter 2:24, 2 Corinthians 5:21)
Now notice Colossians 2:13–15:
"God made you alive... having forgiven us all our trespasses, by cancelling the record of debt... He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame..."
Did you catch that? Before Christ disarmed Satan, the debt was cancelled. His victory over Satan came after satisfying divine justice. So:
Christus Victor is the result.
Penal Substitution is the cause.
And don’t miss what Jesus Himself said in Luke 22:37:
"For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.”"
He’s quoting Isaiah 53—and He’s interpreting His own death through it, just prior to going to the cross. "Numbered with the transgressors" isn’t just about being crucified between two criminals. It’s a theological statement: He is taking the place of sinners.
Isaiah 53 says:
"He was pierced for our transgressions"
"The Lord has laid on Him the iniquity of us all"
"It was the will of the Lord to crush Him"
"By His knowledge shall the righteous one, my servant, make many to be accounted righteous"
That’s penal substitution.
Even the early church saw this.
Athanasius (4th century), in On the Incarnation, wrote:
"The Word… took to Himself a body capable of death, that it… might be worthy to die in the stead of all."
Eusebius of Caesarea said:
"The Lamb of God… was chastised on our behalf, and suffered a penalty He did not owe, but which we owed… and transferred to Himself the scourging, the insults, and the dishonour, which were due to us… being made a curse for us."
Lastly let me say, the cross is only victorious because Jesus bore our sin and satisfied divine justice.
That's why Paul could say:
"He loved me and gave Himself for me" (Galatians 2:20).
Our sins had to be punished. Yes, we are saved by God's grace, but that does not mean the sins went unpunished, that would make God unjust.I don’t accept penal substitution. God the Father is not a monster, nor do I accept Calvinism. I don’t find it biblical or historically accurate.
Ok.Our sins had to be punished. Yes, we are saved by God's grace, but that does not mean the sins went unpunished, that would make God unjust.
Christ was punished for our sins. The curses (and there are many in the Bible) that belong to us for our sins were laid on Christ, so the blessing Christ deserved, were poured on us.
It amazes me how many Christians don't understand the cross-how many have abandoned the faith that was handed down from the beginning in favor of a novel version of the gospel.It amazes me how many Christians don't understand the cross.
Hell is not going to be full of people Christ died for, reconciled for, was judged for, paid the price for, satisfied God's wrath for.
If He paid the price for all, no one would go to hell. Because there would be nothing left to pay for, no sin, no judgement from God because God is not going to judge the sin twice, the sin He already judged His Son for.Jesus paid the price for all.
This is what all the false religions teach. Do this, do that and God will surely accept you. People trying to get to heaven by their own righteousness. This was exactly the problem of the pharisees of Jesus' time. They knew the law so well, they knew the word of God better than anyone. They lived better than others, they fast more that others, they sacrificed more than others, they kept more rituals and traditions than others, yet Jesus called them the children of the devil. Because they could not see their own sin, they didn't see their need for the Saviour. They looked perfect outwardly, but inwards, their were full of sins, like all of us are.Some will care, and come to Him, some will not, and some will remain with Him while others will fail to remain. No one knows with 100% certainty who the elect are to begin with, and no one can predict their own perseverance anyway.
This passage is written not about Christians but about unbelievers who are convinced of the basic truths of the gospel but who have not placed their faith in Jesus Christ as Savior. They are intellectually persuaded but spiritually uncommitted.It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age— and then have fallen away—to be restored to repentance, because they themselves are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting Him to open shame. Heb 6:4-6
Romans 11:9 does not teach that salvation can be lost. The passage is primarily about God's sovereign plan concerning the Jewish people and their relationship to the covenant. It uses the analogy of an olive tree to illustrate how God can remove some branches (unbelieving Jews) and graft in others (believing Gentiles).“You will say then, “Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in.” Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but tremble. For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either. Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.” Rom 11:19-22
2 Peter 20 is often cited as a passage suggesting salvation can be lost, but it's about a warning against the false teachers and the dangers of backsliding. The passage focuses on the impact of false teachers and their destructive influence, not on the possibility of a true believer losing their salvation.If indeed they have escaped the corruption of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, only to be entangled and overcome by it again, their final condition is worse than it was at first. It would have been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness than to have known it and then to turn away from the holy commandment passed on to them. Of them the proverbs are true: “A dog returns to its vomit,” and, “A sow that is washed goes back to her wallowing in the mud.” 2 Pet 2:20-22
We could trade verses all day long:If He paid the price for all, no one would go to hell. Because there would be nothing left to pay for, no sin, no judgement from God because God is not going to judge the sin twice, the sin He already judged His Son for.
Of course, about unbelievers who've been enlightened and tasted of the heavenly gift. It's a choice. Look at John 12:42-43 to see that belief is something, a gift, actually, that must be embraced and acted upon.This passage is written not about Christians but about unbelievers who are convinced of the basic truths of the gospel but who have not placed their faith in Jesus Christ as Savior. They are intellectually persuaded but spiritually uncommitted.
It just means what it says-Gentile believers can be cut back off from their vital connection to the Vine.Romans 11:9 does not teach that salvation can be lost. The passage is primarily about God's sovereign plan concerning the Jewish people and their relationship to the covenant. It uses the analogy of an olive tree to illustrate how God can remove some branches (unbelieving Jews) and graft in others (believing Gentiles).
A dangerous, faith ship-wrecking, life threatening, possibility. No need to desparately seek weak work-arounds. Novel answers abound, most of them at least a bit lame.2 Peter 20 is often cited as a passage suggesting salvation can be lost, but it's about a warning against the false teachers and the dangers of backsliding. The passage focuses on the impact of false teachers and their destructive influence, not on the possibility of a true believer losing their salvation.
Yes, whoever the "us" were that Paul was speaking of there. Either way, we'll know with absolute certainty in the next life. And I doubt that everyone Paul was addressing or who first heard that letter read necessarily ended up saved, for that matter. Meanwhile, if we're producing good fruit then we can trust, having strong assurance, that He'll be bringing us home to Himself.Romans 8 38 For I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.
You are the one who needs to look closer. How convenient for you to only quote Hebrews 3:5-14 and not include verse 1.You might want to look a little closer:
5 And Moses verily was faithful in all his house, as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken after;
In view is the Covenant of Law. Moses was faithful, but those with counterfeit faith were not.
6 But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.
While the LOST (loss of salvation teachers) read this and do not see unbelievers, but born-again believers, the question I have to ask is, have they never read Hebrews?
7 Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice,
8 Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness:
9 When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.
10 Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.
11 So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.)
12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
The writer is speaking about Hebrew brethren. That's not up for debate, it's just a fact.
And what he is doing is telling his Hebrew audience that they be careful not to replicate the error of their forebears in the desert. Throughout the Epistle, the writer will contrast the Covenant of Law and the New Covenant. It is his goal to encourage those among the Hebrew people who have not yet progressed from the Covenant of Law to embrace the New Covenant. When you read Hebrews, we need to be aware of this, or, we will end up yanking proof-texts out of their context to support doctrines contrary to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
God bless.
Yes.Are you sure about that?