On absolute truth and its source, the Creator: the cyclic definition and proof

[AlicePar]

As a woman, you have much more reasons to believe in God. The women are more kind and beautiful. The different religions are contradicting each other, because many of them do contain the false dogmas. The Godman Jesus is the Way to the Father.
The people do stumble on the Way, many of them are going the false side ways too.

You believing things like that is just so sad.

 

[AV1611VET]

You believing things like that is just so sad.

 

[joinfree]

You believing things like that is just so sad.

My Faith is the faithfulness to Knowledge.

 

[AlicePar]

My Faith is the faithfulness to Knowledge.

As is the faith used by every religious person on the planet with each one just as right as every other believer, religious faith causes blindness in every one who uses it.

 

[AV1611VET]

As is the faith used by every religious person on the planet with each one just as right as every other believer,

Do you really believe that?

Really?

If not ... do you mind if I don't believe it either?

... religious faith causes blindness in every one who uses it.

Then you guys must be the most religious on the planet, as your science is so myopic, it borders blindness.

Your science doesn't even know what year it is.

Not to mention the times it's changed its label: BC/AD, BCE/CE.

 

[joinfree]

As is the faith used by every religious person on the planet with each one just as right as every other believer, religious faith causes blindness in every one who uses it.

Take my Religion and try to prove it false, otherwise it is sinful trolling.

 

[Gene2memE]

Take my Religion and try to prove it false, otherwise it is sinful trolling.

Your logical fallacy is burden of proof

 

[joinfree]

Your logical fallacy is burden of proof

You can not make case against my Religion. Correct?

 

[AlicePar]

Take my Religion and try to prove it false, otherwise it is sinful trolling.

Religions continued existance is down to the fact that we can not prove a negative, fairies and Unicorns have the same problem, your religion is just as true and just as false as every other religion in the world.

 

[AlicePar]

You can not make case against my Religion. Correct?

Correct, but we can not make a case against 'any' religion which means they are all as true and as false as your religion.
Someone said there are about 2700 religions in the world and if it's true then I don't believe in any of them, you don't believe in the other 2699 so you are nearly as big an atheist as I am, if you ever wonder why people do not believe in your God it's exactly the same reason you don't believe in any of those other Gods.

 

[AV1611VET]

Religions continued existance is down to the fact that we can not prove a negative,

Whose fault is that?

Ours, or your myopic science's?

... fairies and Unicorns have the same problem,

They can't prove a negative either? sorry about their luck.

... your religion is just as true and just as false as every other religion in the world.

Says the guy with Saint Andrew's cross on his flag.

 

[AV1611VET]

Correct, but we can not make a case against 'any' religion which means they are all as true and as false as your religion.

Don't tell me about cases, when you couldn't make a case against Louise Woodward.

If you want to talk about cases, tell me why your own congress tripled your tuition.

Or didn't they make a good enough case?

 

[Strathos]

The OP is giving me Gottservant flashbacks

 

[AlicePar]

Don't tell me about cases, when you couldn't make a case against Louise Woodward.

If you want to talk about cases, tell me why your own congress tripled your tuition.

Or didn't they make a good enough case?

Do I sense desperation or is this the normal way you carry on? you are jumping back and forth trying to muddy the waters, is that your way of warding off conflict?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don't envy you one bit because you even seem able to lie to yourself.

Though I might agree with the sentiment this is a violation of the TOS of this site. If you want to stay you should not write such posts. It is a clear violation of the rules to call someone a liar, no matter how egregious of a post that that person writes.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Do you really believe that?

Really?

If not ... do you mind if I don't believe it either?Then you guys must be the most religious on the planet, as your science is so myopic, it borders blindness.

Your science doesn't even know what year it is.

Not to mention the times it's changed its label: BC/AD, BCE/CE.

Science is hardly "myopic". You appear to be projecting your flaws upon others. And the reason that there are changes in science is because we are continually learning and improving. You have a belief that is wrong and has no means of correction.

 

[AlicePar]

Though I might agree with the sentiment this is a violation of the TOS of this site. If you want to stay you should not write such posts. It is a clear violation of the rules to call someone a liar, no matter how egregious of a post that that person writes.

Are you saying that people are allowed to tell lies but no one is allowed to say they are telling lies?
that seems a bit one sided wouldn't you say? what am I talking about we're on a Christian website, silly me.

 

[Gene2memE]

You can not make case against my Religion. Correct?

Having come from it, I can.

I just won't, as I don't need to.

You're the one that the philosophical burden of proof rests on. Trying to shirk that does nothing to convince others of the correctness of your beliefs, it just changes the discussion.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Are you saying that people are allowed to tell lies but no one is allowed to say they are telling lies?
that seems a bit one sided wouldn't you say? what am I talking about we're on a Christian website, silly me.

Yes, those are the rules. And as long as they are not making a personal attack all you can do is to correct them. If you can support your claims with evidence and links to proper sources you still can get your point across.


I have been on both heavily moderated sites and poorly moderated sites. They each have their advantages and drawbacks.

 

[Gene2memE]

Mispost