You were looking at a protest that became a riot, where some broke windows, caused other damage, and got out of control.
You were looking at a protest that became a riot, where some broke windows, caused other damage, and got out of control.
That's an interesting spin. President Biden never speaks to anyone unscripted, if he/handlers can help it.Daily for the GOP, in any event -- they have a history of avoiding speaking to their constituents...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ds-fix-for-chaotic-town-halls-dont-hold-them/
Where oh where is Mitch McConnell hiding out?
R.N.C. Signals a Pullout From Presidential Debates
Well, I wasn't there. I'm sure they had various interests. But this is one thing I have heard mentioned several times when they are interviewed:What were they protesting?
You were actually there?...I just love it when some stranger on the internet pretends to know what I saw with my own eyes.
That's an interesting spin. President Biden never speaks to anyone unscripted, if he/handlers can help it.
Well, I wasn't there. I'm sure they had various interests. But
Well, I wasn't there. I'm sure they had various interests. But this is one thing I have heard mentioned several times when they are interviewed:
"The first 125 entries reported in the NYT data feed were basically reasonable. The results varied in percentage of votes between Presidential candidates and appeared to be random with most votes going to President Trump. Up through this time (11:03 Eastern), President Trump was leading 52% to Biden’s 46%. At this time 3.3 million of the eventual 4.4 million votes had already been cast or about 75% of the vote was in. This is when things went off the rails.
Eight entries totaling nearly (800,000) votes were removed from the database during this time. This makes no sense. Each vote should be added to the vote totals not taken away.
Overall three entries of over 300,000 votes were posted in the data base to Biden’s vote total. Two entries of over 300,000 votes were taken away. The same happened to President Trump’s totals but in much smaller amounts. Overall 851,000 votes were added to Biden’s totals and only 318,000 were awarded to President Trump between 11:14pm (Eastern) on November 3rd and 5:00am November 4th. This resulted in over half a million more votes net and 73% of the votes going to Biden during this time frame."
THE BIG QUESTION: Democrats Still Haven't Explained How HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of Votes Were Dumped in Middle of Night for Joe Biden
You were actually there?
Or you saw the same video we all saw?
one thing I have heard mentioned several times
I saw live coverage from various news organizations...including PBS Newshour who had reporters outside and inside the Capitol building.
Look, there's no need to continue with your gaslighting and deliberate denial of what happened that day.
Crime out of control
, the Border completely unaddressed with millions having poured over
and been flown around by the Biden Administration to different cities and released
insane inflation
unstable economy
potential WAR with Russia
an MIA VP.
So constant deflection to Trump makes sense if you are part of this mess.
So you missed the debates and the press conferences?
"The last guy said stupid stuff" is not an appropriate response here. THIS President says stupid stuff and the handlers fear that, thereby limiting his interaction with the press and the public. Just last week this president called a reporter a "Stupid SOB" ON mike at the Presidential podium before the entire nation.This administration has learned from the mistakes from the last one -- his predecessor racked up more flagged tweets than electoral votes.
Source that it has all been debunked.My recollection is this has all been debunked. But just things I see that are flawed -- why are there no links to this "data" from the NY Times? Is there a reason I should trust them -- particularly when the charts they show (which do not appear to be from the NY Times) votes to two decimal places? For example, they claim the negative votes taken from Biden were 330,153.34; how is 1/3 of a vote being taken away -- particular since the vote total before it was 1,771,657.95 -- how were there 19/20ths of a vote?
Next, they show roughly 640,000 votes taken away from Biden and only about 120,000 votes taken away from Trump -- wouldn't the charge be that Trump/Republicans cheated since Biden was the one that lost so many votes?
But the biggest thing, why are they using NY Times data -- the NY Times merely reported the data they received and, as can often happen, mistakes may have been made when they received the data and, if they made mistakes, it didn't effect the official vote count. If this had really happened, they'd be showing the official vote count by the State of Virginia. The fact they use the NY Times data would imply that the NY Times made a mistake (if this "data" is honest and accurate) and corrected it when they realized their count did not agree with the official Virginia count.
The fact is, from everything I've seen, there were no errors in the "official" count in any state -- every time it has been pointed out they've pointed out corrections by news organizations, where that company made mistakes, I've not seen any "corrections" like that in the official count of any state.
Next, counts did not stop in the swing states -- they are flat out wrong (or lying) about that. Some precincts shut down. The "famous" alleged "shut down" that led to these claims was in Fulton County, GA; where people were told that they were going to shut down for the night, workers thought they were shutting down, but then they were told they needed to keep counting the vote.
As for Trump having an early lead -- this was predicted well before the election (this article is from Oct. 9, 2020, almost a month before the election) -- due to how the counts were required to occur by law. As a general rule, most of Pres. Trumps votes were made by people voting in person and most of the votes for Joe Biden were going to be "mail in" votes. In most states -- including the swing states -- the law says that mail in votes cannot be counted until after the polls close. As such, the in person votes, the strong Trump vote, were counted first (the machines basically counted them as they were cast during the day) and then they started processing the mail in votes later in the evening -- so Trump had an early lead which gradually went away, particularly as the votes from large urban areas (which tend to vote Democratic) were counted.
I saw all the same reporting as well as videos taken by those on the spot (Twitter).I saw live coverage from various news organizations...including PBS Newshour who had reporters outside and inside the Capitol building.
Look, there's no need to continue with your gaslighting and deliberate denial of what happened that day.
Source proving what you cut out was wrong?I have heard all that too, many times. None of it has any evidential support.
These figures, however often they are repeated - hundreds of times over the last 15 months now - are still wrong.
Source that it has all been debunked.
watched the returns myself that night. The count certainly did stop in the middle of the night for a period of time and suddenly Biden was winning.
It is what it is, now. But it hasn't been debunked that there were certainly irregularities with the counting.
The important thing now is that someone competent and rational and logical is President in 2 years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?