- Dec 28, 2011
- 1,560
- 276
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Yep. Torah as the Foundation. If it don't agree with Torah, then the problem lies with the reader.
You did that so well.

Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yep. Torah as the Foundation. If it don't agree with Torah, then the problem lies with the reader.

Since I cannot dispute your doctrines you win according to CF rules.?? you can not reconcile the God you know and the one in scripture?? As they are one and the same... what part of scripture can you not reconcile..; preconceived notions that Paul is scripture and all the rest is out of whack??
You can always pm me with the discrepancies as you see them then... because when I asked the questions, I wanted to know where you were having troubles with OT and NT harmony.Since I cannot dispute your doctrines you win according to CF rules.
I'm wondering if the "rules" are just an excuse for Dollar? Now that he sees there might be truth to contend with, it's easier to run away. Just sayin'.
I'd rather discuss them openly but it's not permitted here.You can always pm me with the discrepancies as you see them then... because when I asked the questions, I wanted to know where you were having troubles with OT and NT harmony.
I guess if you insist, then I wouldn't be in violation. Ask away folks.It is rude not to respond to questions, and it is not against CF rules, either. Please be kind enough to answer my question in post #56 above.
I was going by the Law of Moses, not my views.I wanted him to answer as to whether he has ever done the slightest bit of work on the Sabbath? If so, should he not be stoned according to his own views? If not, why not?
Or you folks can start a thread in a legit forum for debating. Unless you see there might be truth to contend with?I'm wondering if the "rules" are just an excuse for Dollar? Now that he sees there might be truth to contend with, it's easier to run away. Just sayin'.
Or you folks can start a thread in a legit forum for debating. Unless you see there might be truth to contend with?
I do not think we have a debating section within this congregational area for non MJ.Or you folks can start a thread in a legit forum for debating. Unless you see there might be truth to contend with?
I was going by the Law of Moses, not my views.
When you answer that question, then ask yourself "would that also include the people of the commonwealth of Israel?".Dollar,
Who were the Laws of Moses given to?
The "legit" forum you seek is in the General Theology section. You'll be with folks you can agree with. As far as people coming here to give us the "truth", well, we've heard it all and argued it all. And we keep coming up with the same answer (that means we're not insane). So dear sir, you are just one little drop in a bucket of "messengers".Or you folks can start a thread in a legit forum for debating. Unless you see there might be truth to contend with?
Or you folks can start a thread in a legit forum for debating. Unless you see there might be truth to contend with?