Private funding, but still distributed to the public through Government -- in violation of CA Constitution
Spending $200K/yr / migrant child, including in-person educationOk...thank you for clearing that up.
If a private entity wants to create a charity for a group they can by all means do so.
I don't think the government should enact racial discrimination on behalf of private sector entities.
If that is allowed....it's pretty hard to argue against anyone doing it.
Clearly California sought to remove their civil rights act to do this racist garbage. There's a process for this....they can stand up in debate and explain whose children they want to oppress and why.
Then the federal government should step in and explain why they aren't allowed.
Just when we thought it couldn't get any more weird....
If you think you're safe from being called a racist or even "white privileged" just because you're not white, think again. They now have a new label---Multicultural Whiteness. Enjoy!
Understanding Multiracial Whiteness And Trump Supporters
I don't even get it. What's wrong with Rumble? It's awesome to see a site becoming a viable competitor to YT"R.u.m.b.l.e." is not a "get out of debate with the win for free" card, that's essentially ad hominem
Name the claimed facts you dispute
Fair is fair, if you can denigrate my sources, then I can denigrate your sources
I cite a Rumble source, you veto
You cite a MSM source, I veto
Now where are we?
You never learned the importance of "critical thinking" in High School Wellness class? Sifting through statements to find the truth, even amidst spin?
Nobody not part of your choir will ever think you are somehow "less biased" than me
So you don't know what you're talking about or whom you're talking about...just making assumptions. And no non-rumble link to explain what it's about.It said the city of Oakland....so I assumed the program came from them as a matter of policy or law.
If it's private charity...feel free to explain.
Appears, to you. Well, that settles it.They would be any lawmakers who seek to discriminate by race. They appear to be on the left these days.
When I see a non-historian like Beltran claiming that the US has a white supremacist history.....what is she saying? That white supremacist ideology is the best explanation of motive for most of the nation's history?
It looks like that's what she's saying.
If context is enough....
Then I can only conclude that she is a racist willing to make negative racist generalizations about the millions of latinos voting for Trump.
No facts were given, not even a short synopsis. Something about Oakland and discrimination, but what exactly?"R.u.m.b.l.e." is not a "get out of debate with the win for free" card, that's essentially ad hominem
Name the claimed facts you dispute
Sure, because all sources are equal and equally valid.Fair is fair, if you can denigrate my sources, then I can denigrate your sources
Did you know that there are non-rumble sites that are also informative with a right-wing perspective? It's true!I cite a Rumble source, you veto
You cite a MSM source, I veto
Now where are we?
Straw man. I have not claimed to be unbiased or even less biased than you.Sifting through statements to find the truth, even amidst spin?
Nobody not part of your choir will ever think you are somehow "less biased" than me
What negative racist generalisations does she make that you base that conclusion on?
Of course she isn’t. What gives you the idea she is trying to explain history? The context is US history
She says something about these millions of latino voters wanting to hate people....
Do you really want me to quote her?
Which she characterized as white supremacist....
You can ask me to interpret her vague nonsense...or you can agree it's too vague.
Which do you want?
So you don't know what you're talking about or whom you're talking about...just making assumptions. And no non-rumble link to explain what it's about.
Appears, to you. Well, that settles it.
Sure go ahead, quote her characterisation of US history as ‘white supremacist’.
"And so whiteness as an ideology is rooted in America's history of white supremacy - right?"
‘America’s history of white supremacy’ - do you take that to mean American history is white supremacy?
How else am I to take it? She doesn't explain it at all.
Are you being serious here? Do you mean that you don’t understand the meaning of ‘a history of...’?
Explain what she means....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?