B
Born_to_Lose_Live_to_Win
Guest
fatpie42 said:1. If the keyboard in front of me is real, then 'something' exists. That would mean something must exist. It isn't possible for something to be nothing at the same time so not everything can be nothingness.
2. If the keyboard in front of me is not real then I have a false belief about a keyboard. (If the belief in a keyboard is not false see point (1)
3. It might be argued that the belief about the keyboard cannot be false because it would have to be false ABOUT something and, since there is only nothing, there is nothing to be false about. Nevertheless it still remains that I am having an appearance of a keyboard and an appearance is surely something. If appearances do not count as something then we seem to have stumbled on a kind of Idealism (the epistemological kind - google 'George Berkeley') - so what?
This whole idea seems either nonsensical or trivial to me.
Is that better?
'Your first point arrives at 'Not everything can be nothingness' if the keyboard is real.
Nothingness is absolute non-existence.
Nothingness is not an object like an apple.
"There is at least one orange in my basket, so not everything can be apples'.
How can such a statement be made about nothingness?
Upvote
0