How do the Anabaptist church feel about someone who works for a company that builds things as ships for the Navy, or Aircraft for the Airforce. Would that compromise their non-violence stance?
Thanks in advance
Thanks in advance
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
non-violence question
- Thread starter L.J.
- Start date
B
Basil the Great
Guest
My family lost their Mennonite faith on both my mom and dad's sides about six generations back, so I will not pretend to speak for them here. However, I do not know how someone who considers themselves a pacifist could justify being involved with the building of a weapon of war.
Upvote
0
jimfish
evangelical/charismatic/anabaptist/Wesleyan/etc
- Jan 3, 2012
- 72
- 7
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Each anabaptist, who is hopefully also born-again and not just born-into, must "most likely" decide for themselves, between them and God, as to to what degree they apply the non-government involvement part of anabaptism to their Christian walk. We as NT believers are under the Law of the Conscience, after all.
For example, one anabaptist might believe that they are not to defend themselves, but may defend a spouse or children or country; whereas another anabaptist might believe they are to be pacifistic against both themselves and all others. An anabaptist might even evolve from one degree of pacifism to another over the course of his walk, and maybe even back again. It might depend upon a degree of faith, a level of maturity/further "enlightenment," or whatever.
In short, anabaptism "probably" should not be some legalistic approach to a fuller Gospel, but ammendments to one's spiritual journey with Christ, as He leads, by Grace.
The Counsel at Jerusalem with the Apostles, already laid out the extent of the beneficial-to-the-church-at-large "legalistic" rules.
(Side note: During times of a draft, the government itself also likely would dictate to what degree a religious pacifist could exclude themselves from war-like activity, as I believe my memory of history has dictated--not very reliable.)
For example, one anabaptist might believe that they are not to defend themselves, but may defend a spouse or children or country; whereas another anabaptist might believe they are to be pacifistic against both themselves and all others. An anabaptist might even evolve from one degree of pacifism to another over the course of his walk, and maybe even back again. It might depend upon a degree of faith, a level of maturity/further "enlightenment," or whatever.
In short, anabaptism "probably" should not be some legalistic approach to a fuller Gospel, but ammendments to one's spiritual journey with Christ, as He leads, by Grace.
The Counsel at Jerusalem with the Apostles, already laid out the extent of the beneficial-to-the-church-at-large "legalistic" rules.
(Side note: During times of a draft, the government itself also likely would dictate to what degree a religious pacifist could exclude themselves from war-like activity, as I believe my memory of history has dictated--not very reliable.)
Upvote
0
Probably the same as someone who works for a company that makes silverware. It isn't a weapon until someone (else) uses it as one.
Remember that Anabaptist non-violence and non-resistance is based in the Sermon on the Mount and the Sermon on the Plain in the Gospels and in 1 Peter, among others. These verses have more to do with personal conduct than peripherally aiding and abetting the military industrial complex. There's a fairly bright line.
Upvote
0
W
woolgathering
Guest
The Plough website has a .pdf of an early anabaptist writing on non-violence called
Concerning The Sword
A Hutterian Apologia of 1577
Its author is not named but was probably the Hutterian bishop Peter Walpot (1521-1578).
Concerning The Sword
A Hutterian Apologia of 1577
Its author is not named but was probably the Hutterian bishop Peter Walpot (1521-1578).
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
WayneinMaine
Regular Member
That is a good catch, woolgathering. From the article we read:
"Even if I personally did not want to be an arsonist, yet paid someone else for that purpose; even if Ito be precise, myselfdid not want to do something, yet paid someone else to do it, and then authorized that person to go; indeed, if I were an enemy of a magistrate or ruling lord, yet did not want to strangle him with my own hands, but instead equipped and sent someone else to carry out this deed; would I then not be punished as a murderer, as if I had carried out the deed myself? Indeed, most certainly I would, and with good reason! In this same manner, and even more so, God will bring punishment upon someone who personally does not shed blood but allows others to fight in war in his or her stead, compensating and supporting them. These alternatives are one and the same, and before God merit the same reward. "
This was undoubtedly the practice among the early Anabaptists; to avoid all contribution to the world's warfare, vengence, and retribution. Unfortunately most Mennonites, Amish, Hutterites and Brethren are less inclined today to be so separate (and perhaps have 'the sword' applied to them.)
On a personal level, I have declined the best options for my career by avoiding employment in the "military industrial complex", going all the way back to Ronald Reagan's SDI programs (though In was sorely tempted!)
Upvote
0
There is a company about 30 miles from here that acquired a contract to build helicopters for the military. A Mennonite brother was working for this company. After they started on this project, he quit for the reasons cited.
So, to answer your question, many would say 'yes'.
Upvote
0
WayneinMaine
Regular Member
Many would think that is compromising Jesus's teachings. I personally have made sacrifices in that area.
Upvote
0
M
Michael Snow
Guest
The faculty blog for Eternity Bible College just had an eight part series on Christians and Violence. It was very good to see other evangelical Christians discussing this topic.
Christians & Violence, Part 1
Christians & Violence, Part 1
Upvote
0
WWJD552
Newbie
- May 27, 2012
- 45
- 4
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
This is a good question. I lost two friends in the last 3 years fighting overseas. The Amish seemed to laugh and call the military the devil of america. And the Amish and anabaptists are so perfect ? This blows my mind sometimes.
Upvote
0
WayneinMaine
Regular Member
Who are these Amish that laughed? I don't know any Amish or Mennonites of Hutterites who would take something like that so lightly. I think you are making this up.
Upvote
0
M
Michael Snow
Guest
This blog and the comments also sets a very good example of how Christians ought to engage in such controversial discussions. Something we all could learn from.
Link of last post:
http://facultyblog.eternitybiblecollege.com/2012/05/25/the-end-of-christians-and-violence/
Upvote
0
Similar threads
