You said time is an illusion. That is not what Einstein said. Einstein is saying that simultaneity is an illusion.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"...for us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one." Einstein
Whose the liar?
Evidence? Evidence by mere mortal men who think they know more then God.
Is that your "interpretation?" ...Right!You said time is an illusion. That is not what Einstein said. Einstein is saying that simultaneity is an illusion.
Is that your "interpretation?" ...Right!
God told me you should believe the scientists.Evidence? Evidence by mere mortal men who think they know more then God. Such an old excuse. And some of the things you say now will be changed again 10 years from now when scientists say they had some things wrong yet again. Remember, science said the sun revolved around us, the earth was flat....etc. I know my side and nothing a mere mortal can say will change that. In other words some scientists have an IQ of lets say 160. God has an IQ of lets say 1,000,000,000. Who should I believe? The 160 guy or the God with 1 billion.
Where have you got the idea that science says that time is an illusion?
How does science stand its ground on the age of the universe, when science cannot agree that Time is anything but an illusion?
The OP seems imply that there is some sort of consensus ("...science cannot agree...") to this issue with time, yet when I read this article I see that it says that what it refers to "is the most radical of all solutions". Your link undermines the OP.
The OP seems imply that there is some sort of consensus ("...science cannot agree...") to this issue with time, yet when I read this article I see that it says that what it refers to "is the most radical of all solutions". Your link undermines the OP.
The OP seems imply that there is some sort of consensus
("...science cannot agree...") to this issue with time,
Ironically non-believers talk about how the bible is flawed and science knows the truth. But every generation of scientists says that. Scientist from 10 years ago had differing views. And 10 years before that, different views. So if science is constantly changing its views on whats correct, why would I want to listen to them? Especially when the bible says what is correct and never changes? This is why I say humans are no way smart enough, nor will they ever be smart enough to know everything. Like if they can prove God is/is not real. Its impossible to. They would have to have checked every inch of space, beyond the "edge" of the universe (as they say). in every planet, in every black hole... then we get into checking every dimension and so on. Until they do that they cannot say God does not exist. And they never will be able to because we are, compared to God, simple minded people.
But a story moves along a timespan, which is a part of the timeline.There is no timeline, only a storyline.
I see I am responding early in the dialogue, so if what I say is repeating someone else, forgive me. I concur that God is the first reality, but to think that the creation and time are illusory misunderstands the power of God. This sounds like you assume that we are all nothing more than his imagination. But the power of God is to give life that is separate from Him and to create a creation that is separate from Him that exists in reality.There is no timeline, only a storyline. Time is an illusion. Matter is mere energy, a creation, that is passing away. And if we are of God...then we are greater than the world. Psalm 8:4
Evidence? Evidence by mere mortal men who think they know more then God. Such an old excuse. And some of the things you say now will be changed again 10 years from now when scientists say they had some things wrong yet again. Remember, science said the sun revolved around us, the earth was flat....etc. I know my side and nothing a mere mortal can say will change that. In other words some scientists have an IQ of lets say 160. God has an IQ of lets say 1,000,000,000. Who should I believe? The 160 guy or the God with 1 billion.
No, no, I took his word for the math he did. But the math I did was simply to put his findings together with the truth of God. I'm a wiz like that.
His application of the verb 'agree' to the word 'science', as if 'science', on the whole, is in agreement with his claim.In what way does your quote indicate consensus?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?