Why do you insist on having proof of evolution? Why do you think that the evidence for evolution is not sufficient for you to accept it provisionally, like any other scientific theory? As any book on the subject will explain, there are enormous amounts of evidence for evolution, chiefly from genetics, but also from comparative anatomy, taxonomy, embryology, biogeography and the fossil record. What alternative explanation would you propose for all this evidence?
Oh you mean what they/you assume is evidence?
But before we get started are you going to do like Jimmy D and others do, argue this with me, and when you can't get me to agree, when you can't refute something or get frustrated down there on what you may begin to see is the losing end or whatever, then pull one of the biggest cop outs I've ever seen in these arguments and switch gears to tell me I've no right to argue because I'm not smart enough/or how stupid I am to have the audacity to disagree? If so, you need to back out now and not waste my time or yours.
IOW, when you get desperate, don't go haywire like some here.
Upvote
0