Hi all! I just discovered this video about an Eastern Orthodox priest describing the Nestorianism present in the Last Temptation of Christ. It starts at 25:50 and is only about 2 minutes long.
There is also this discussion on an Orthodox forum about it. The best post is mid-way down.
This is how ecumenism is done folks.
Here's my question. I affirm Nestorianism was a heresy, but how do we uphold the Hypostatic Union, yet condemned Nestorian and the above video (where we agree with the Orthodox priest), but still reason through verses like Matthew 24:36 saying that Jesus was talking about not knowing in his humanity as many say? Doesn't this fall into the same trap of separating the natures?
There is also this discussion on an Orthodox forum about it. The best post is mid-way down.
This is how ecumenism is done folks.
Here's my question. I affirm Nestorianism was a heresy, but how do we uphold the Hypostatic Union, yet condemned Nestorian and the above video (where we agree with the Orthodox priest), but still reason through verses like Matthew 24:36 saying that Jesus was talking about not knowing in his humanity as many say? Doesn't this fall into the same trap of separating the natures?