You are saying that the consensus of the overwhelming number of relevant experts is bunk yet you have nothing but less-than-a-layperson's understanding of the subject at hand.
No not bunk at all. They see this unfounded opinion as a reasonable explanation but it is not based on fact, as I have shown (therefore I did answer your point)....is it not your camp that always says if there is no physical evidence then it is not so? Yes it is! Now apply the same rules to the things you accept as true and test them by your same requirement. Venter's experiment though brilliant and very creative clearly DOES NOT infer abiogenesis at all. It infers man's incredible advancement in genetic engineering relying on extant life to start and extant life to finish...I applaud Venter, but am ashamed of those who impose these assumption based conclusions into his remarkable achievement.
It is like the story of the Ostrich. For decades I spoke with people who believed the assumptions that because of the smaller keel this implied Ostriches evolved into being flightless birds over millions of years (the present keel ALLEGEDLY being a vestigial development). I argued against the assumption part not the fact part. Then we discovered the ancestor of the Ostrich (Palaeotis from the middle Eocene era) from 40,000,000 years ago even then had a smaller keel not like the larger one required by the assumption based conclusion. So just as with the Kakpos in New Zealand I stand ON the FACT that there is ZERO evidence for the assumption, though the fiction that would fit the pre-determined conclusion (making the theory appear to be true) is still spouted as "obvious" by the majority (but based on NOTHING real)....
So continue with the insults it does not surprise me but you are still not showing anything that cannot be reasonably and logically seen in other ways and with that I say HURRAH, the majority is often wrong about so many things, if it were not we would still be in the dark ages, or convinced of a universe based on Newtonian Mechanics, and likely still enslaving people of African descent, and women would certainly never have voted.
No not bunk at all. They see this unfounded opinion as a reasonable explanation but it is not based on fact, as I have shown (therefore I did answer your point)....is it not your camp that always says if there is no physical evidence then it is not so? Yes it is! Now apply the same rules to the things you accept as true and test them by your same requirement. Venter's experiment though brilliant and very creative clearly DOES NOT infer abiogenesis at all. It infers man's incredible advancement in genetic engineering relying on extant life to start and extant life to finish...I applaud Venter, but am ashamed of those who impose these assumption based conclusions into his remarkable achievement.
It is like the story of the Ostrich. For decades I spoke with people who believed the assumptions that because of the smaller keel this implied Ostriches evolved into being flightless birds over millions of years (the present keel ALLEGEDLY being a vestigial development). I argued against the assumption part not the fact part. Then we discovered the ancestor of the Ostrich (Palaeotis from the middle Eocene era) from 40,000,000 years ago even then had a smaller keel not like the larger one required by the assumption based conclusion. So just as with the Kakpos in New Zealand I stand ON the FACT that there is ZERO evidence for the assumption, though the fiction that would fit the pre-determined conclusion (making the theory appear to be true) is still spouted as "obvious" by the majority (but based on NOTHING real)....
So continue with the insults it does not surprise me but you are still not showing anything that cannot be reasonably and logically seen in other ways and with that I say HURRAH, the majority is often wrong about so many things, if it were not we would still be in the dark ages, or convinced of a universe based on Newtonian Mechanics, and likely still enslaving people of African descent, and women would certainly never have voted.
Upvote
0
