So, I've decided to ask this question of Young (or Young at Heart) Earth Creationists in a challenge response to AV's numerous 'Challenges'.... though, I'd like to think this would actually be constructive over AV's hypothetical scenarios with no fixed facts... (not meaning to offend of course AV! )
If this universe is a direct fiat creation by God, and the bible is God's word filtered through fallible men, why is it that the second option is believed above the directly observed evidence of the creator of the universe?
Points to consider in a reply:
If this universe is a direct fiat creation by God, and the bible is God's word filtered through fallible men, why is it that the second option is believed above the directly observed evidence of the creator of the universe?
Points to consider in a reply:
- We don't have the original books making the Bible
- We can directly examine the world around us, life, the universe & everything in between
- There is tangible and demonstrable advantage to knowing facts about the world around us, life, the universe & everything in between
- The Scientific Method is the most effective method in narrowing in on these facts about the world around us, life, the universe & everything in between