My Ultimate Diamond Challenge

[AV1611VET]

Thus, no requirement for angels.

I'm not a Sadducee ...

Acts 23:8a For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit:

... so I get to invoke angelic activity into my explanations.

 

[Kylie]

I'm not a Sadducee ...

Acts 23:8a For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit:

... so I get to invoke angelic activity into my explanations.

Unfortunately, you will never find out the truth if you start with a premise as your conclusion.

 

[AV1611VET]

Unfortunately, you will never find out the truth if you start with a premise as your conclusion.

Did Marie Curie ever find out what killed her?

 

[Kylie]

Did Marie Curie ever find out what killed her?

What in the world does this have to do with anything? Are you trying to make a point here? If so, kindly make it and don't waste my time.

 

[AV1611VET]

What in the world does this have to do with anything? Are you trying to make a point here? If so, kindly make it and don't waste my time.

LOL

You average <3 posts per day, and most of them are aimed at me; and you say I'm wasting your time?

Solid aurum.

TBH, you make me feel privileged.

 

[HitchSlap]

... so I get to invoke angelic activity into my explanations.

Not really, this is the science section of the forum.

 

[AV1611VET]

Not really, this is the science section of the forum.

I know.

 

[HitchSlap]

I know.

I'm not so sure you do...

 

[Kylie]

LOL

You average <3 posts per day, and most of them are aimed at me; and you say I'm wasting your time?

Solid aurum.

TBH, you make me feel privileged.

Me responding to someone who someone who can't actually tell me what their point is IS a waste of my time. See how you still haven't told me what your point is? That's why it's a waste of my time. How long should I wait for you to get to the point? Because I have better things to do.

 

[Kylie]

Did Marie Curie ever find out what killed her?

What in the world does this have to do with anything? Are you trying to make a point here? If so, kindly make it and don't waste my time.

So, AV, care to tell me what your point was?

 

[AV1611VET]

So, AV, care to tell me what your point was?

Not really.

 

[Kylie]

Not really.

So you were wasting my time.

Honestly, what's the point of you posting if you are just wasting everyone's time?

 

[AV1611VET]

So you were wasting my time.

Honestly, what's the point of you posting if you are just wasting everyone's time?

I'm sorry, Kylie, but I couldn't care less about your time.

You come here once in awhile and claim you're a busy person, but then you seem to concentrate your busy efforts on dad and me.

It seems to me you should be spending what limited time you have on more productive conversations with others here.

I've made this point before, and I'll make it again:

You average less than three posts per day, yet you concentrate them on dad and me.

You make me feel privileged, but in a negative way.

 

[Kylie]

I'm sorry, Kylie, but I couldn't care less about your time.

You come here once in awhile and claim you're a busy person, but then you seem to concentrate your busy efforts on dad and me.

It seems to me you should be spending what limited time you have on more productive conversations with others here.

I've made this point before, and I'll make it again:

You average less than three posts per day, yet you concentrate them on dad and me.

You make me feel privileged, but in a negative way.

I'll spend my time here however I see fit.

All I am asking is that if you are to post replies to my posts, that they actually have something of merit, instead of asking random questions for no reason. Because, you know, I come here to have discussions. If you don't want to do that, why do you bother?

 

[AV1611VET]

Because, you know, I come here to have discussions.

No, I don't know.

Your post count says otherwise.

So does your content.

 

[Kylie]

No, I don't know.

Your post count says otherwise.

So does your content.

So you think that quantity is better than quantity, huh?

And as for content, how many of your posts are just counting?

 

[AV1611VET]

So you think that quantity is better than quantity, huh?

I'd say quantity is equal to quantity.

And as for content, how many of your posts are just counting?

What does it matter?

I can do both.

 

[Kylie]

I'd say quantity is equal to quantity.

Then why are you making such a big deal about quantity? Which would you rather have: an ounce of gold, or a ton of dirty nappies?

What does it matter?

Again, I point you in the direction of my analogy above.

I can do both.

Not at the same time. The posts of yours that are quality (by which I mean an actual attempt to engage in some kind of meaningful discussion) are of low quantity, and the posts that are of high quantity are just sequential numbers - low quality.

 

[AV1611VET]

The posts of yours that are quality (by which I mean an actual attempt to engage in some kind of meaningful discussion) are of low quantity, and the posts that are of high quantity are just sequential numbers - low quality.

Really?

For someone who comes here as seldomly (by comparison to others) as you, that's a doosey of a statement.

FYI, in my favorite forum (Creation & Evolution), just on the first page of threads I have 656 posts; and I have multiple posts in threads on every page for the next 35 pages (where I stopped counting).

Care to revise your statement?

 

[HitchSlap]

Really?

For someone who comes here as seldomly (by comparison to others) as you, that's a doosey of a statement.

FYI, in my favorite forum (Creation & Evolution), just on the first page of threads I have 656 posts; and I have multiple posts in threads on every page for the next 35 pages (where I stopped counting).

Care to revise your statement?

You are proof that quantity does not equal quality. In fact, you could make the case that your demonstration of knowledge is inversely proportional to your post count.