- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,211
- 52,660
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
What the yom does Thalidomide have to do with the earth during the Creation Week?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
My Ultimate Diamond Challenge
- Thread starter TheBear
- Start date
You are ignoring the fact that all diamonds containing 14C are a result of "in situ" conditions, not to mention no diamonds are dated by the 14C method. They are dated from inclusions as described in the full access paper I linked for you. Your argument besides being completely baseless in completely made up.
Upvote
0
Why not? Says who? All pictures (art) I see of them have a belly button.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lucas_Cranach_the_Elder_Adam_and_Eve.JPG
Last edited:
Upvote
0
You didn't refute anything. You expressed an uninformed opinion. To refute you need to show data to the contrary of what I stated. Don't forget that I also previously linked a full paper containing data supporting what I said.
Upvote
0
The opinion was quite informed. RATE pretty much explained it.
So, that means you now have to trash talk RATE. Trash talk is your best defense.
Upvote
0
You have not demonstrated how RATE quantifies young diamonds. No one including RATE has ever dated a diamond using the radiocarbon method.
Would you like to engage me in a FORMAL DEBATE concerning the age a diamonds in the Formal debates forum?
Upvote
0
There is no reason to. I have already show that the C14 wasn't due to "in situ" conditions.
Upvote
0
57, you have not presented any evidence whatsoever to support anything you have said about the age of diamonds in any thread. Again, I challenge you to a formal moderated debate on the subject. Will you accept?
Upvote
0
I'm tempted...but I'm not sure I have the time to do a good job.
What I do know is that the amounts found inside the diamonds, coal is of such a value that the source...you call "in sito" would have had to been enourmous...and we know there wasn't enough material to do what you claimed.
Upvote
0
I don't believe in the literal creation, however, if I did I see no reason why they would not have a belly button. I also see no reason for them to be full adults at time of creation either.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,211
- 52,660
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
It would stand as a testimony as to they being created and not born.
Adam & Eve lived for hundreds of years and were seen by many generations.
Therefore a lack of a belly button would attest to the veracity of their claims.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
