Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again, shouldn’t we get rid of it as some are ignoring it or is that standard just applied to guns because they are sacred and stuff?That law is enforced secondaryly for the most part.
What would you do if I told you that I did not agree with that law (The seat belt one).Again, shouldn’t we get rid of it as some are ignoring it or is that standard just applied to guns because they are sacred and stuff?
Shrug at most.What would you do if I told you that I did not agree with that law (The seat belt one).
Any gun safe can be broken into. It just take some time and a lot of noise. If a person lives in a secluded area and they’re not home for an hour a person can get into that safe with the right tools that you can buy for about $50 at any hardware store.thank you people should NOT be held liable if they took reasonable steps
safety is important, but personally I feel that most of those laws should be secondary in natuure enforcement wise if they are non-violent offenses.Shrug at most.
How about other laws, some will ignore food safety regulations, should we not bother with those then?
What would constitute a fully secured firearm or not is the part that would have to be legally defined in writing, etc.I would agree with this provided that if the person who owned the gun had it securely locked in a safe, if that safe was forcibly opened then he should not be charged for the incident. But I do agree that people who own guns and don’t secure them should be held responsible if someone gets it and commits a crime with it.
that is what I am saying provided they took reasonable steps they should not be held liable.Any gun safe can be broken into. It just take some time and a lot of noise. If a person lives in a secluded area and they’re not home for an hour a person can get into that safe with the right tools that you can buy for about $50 at any hardware store.
Do you imagine the cops are preforming health inspections ?safety is important, but personally I feel that most of those laws should be secondary in natuure enforcement wise if they are non-violent offenses.
I absolutely agree. I don’t want some nutcase getting my gun and hurting or killing anyone with it. That’s why I bought my gun safe before I bought my gun.It's not hard to secure your firearms, or keep them secure, but it's just sheer immaturity/laziness/irresponsibility just because "you don't want to", or don't want to have to bother with that extra or another step, etc.
Doesn't seem to matter to your lazy butt that it could save a lot of lives, etc.
For that reason alone I think you should have all your firearms taken away, etc.
not usuallyDo you imagine the cops are preforming health inspections ?
That is so short sighted. Americans need to think more about their children's future and less about immediate gratification.The problem is as I said before 30 years a long time and really that action would have very little impact in the next ten to twenty anyway. Plus very few gun deaths are like yesterday's shooting in that most gun deaths are either suicide, targeted, or related to some other crime very few deaths of which would be prevented by fewer guns legally in civilian hands.
Yeah you can get some pretty secure safes for pretty cheap these days. I only paid $170 for mine on Amazon. They’re actually cheaper now.It's not hard to secure your firearms, or keep them secure, but it's just sheer immaturity/laziness/irresponsibility just because "you don't want to", or don't want to have to bother with that extra or another step, etc.
Doesn't seem to matter to your lazy butt that it could save a lot of lives, etc.
For that reason alone I think you should have all your firearms taken away, etc.
That would be unamerican.That is so short sighted. Americans need to think more about their children's future and less about immediate gratification.
I've just got trigger and action locks right now, and one rifle that is in a locking case, but I live alone, no children, don't work, so am at home most of the time, have a home security system that I set when I go out and immediately notifies both me and the police when tripped, but, yeah. And it's a studio apartment full of stuff already, and I would have a lot of trouble trying to find a place to put a safe. But, yeah, anyway?Yeah you can get some pretty secure safes for pretty cheap these days. I only paid $170 for mine on Amazon. They’re actually cheaper now.
Actually this isn’t the one I got the one I have has biometric fingerprint reader on it.
You do understand that laws are postscriptive and only act as deterrent to whatever action they outlaw by way of opening up the offender to punishment in criminal court or litigation in civil court, right? I mean, I think you probably know that, but the way you're talking about laws makes it sound like you think that the act of making a law against an activity somehow literally prevents anyone from performing that activity. Obviously that's not the case, so making any argument about how laws don't stop criminals and that they can be ignored can only lead to advocating anarchy. Every law could be argued to be ineffective because criminals can choose to just not follow them. And then in the same breathe most of those who rail against additional guns control laws advocate for more laws against things like drugs and abortion. IT MAKES NO SENSE!safety is important, but personally I feel that most of those laws should be secondary in natuure enforcement wise if they are non-violent offenses.
I have kids and I wanted something that would stop someone from being able to take the guns. We also just recently installed a security camera system and we live in a duplex in a crowded community so most likely anyone who breaks in is probably going to want to stay pretty quiet.I've just got trigger and action locks right now, and one rifle that is in a locking case, but I live alone, no children, don't work, so am at home most of the time, have a home security system that I set when I go out and immediately notifies both me and the police when tripped, but, yeah. And it's a studio apartment full of stuff already, and I would have a lot of trouble trying to find a place to put a safe. But, yeah, anyway?
I wouldn't doubt that a very great majority of, especially these school shootings involving minors, could have all been prevented by just simple trigger or action locks on people's firearms, etc.
God Bless.
The statistics show that females with guns in the house, are more likely to be murdered, than females without guns in the house.so by that logic my sister should be able to have access to her husband's handgun to defend their home if he is away at night shift for 12 hours?
Just having the info does nothing. What do you think it could mean to have that information? In a positive way.What is not postive about that?
Well if they knew a person had problems they may could keep a closer eye on them ( even if they did not know what kind of guns they had). For example, the FBI, GBI ( GA's version of the FBI) and the school district he attended last year spoke to he and his father about online threats to shoot up a school, BUT they released him as they did not have enough to hold him in custody. This was May 23.Just having the info does nothing. What do you think it could mean to have that information? In a positive way.
How would a security camera stop anyone from taking the guns? Sure, you’ll know who has taken them but the guns are still gone.I have kids and I wanted something that would stop someone from being able to take the guns. We also just recently installed a security camera system and we live in a duplex in a crowded community so most likely anyone who breaks in is probably going to want to stay pretty quiet.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?