Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again, shouldn’t we get rid of it as some are ignoring it or is that standard just applied to guns because they are sacred and stuff?
What would you do if I told you that I did not agree with that law (The seat belt one).
Shrug at most.
Any gun safe can be broken into. It just take some time and a lot of noise. If a person lives in a secluded area and they’re not home for an hour a person can get into that safe with the right tools that you can buy for about $50 at any hardware store.
safety is important, but personally I feel that most of those laws should be secondary in natuure enforcement wise if they are non-violent offenses.
What would constitute a fully secured firearm or not is the part that would have to be legally defined in writing, etc.
that is what I am saying provided they took reasonable steps they should not be held liable.
That is so short sighted. Americans need to think more about their children's future and less about immediate gratification.
Yeah you can get some pretty secure safes for pretty cheap these days. I only paid $170 for mine on Amazon. They’re actually cheaper now.
I've just got trigger and action locks right now, and one rifle that is in a locking case, but I live alone, no children, don't work, so am at home most of the time, have a home security system that I set when I go out and immediately notifies both me and the police when tripped, but, yeah. And it's a studio apartment full of stuff already, and I would have a lot of trouble trying to find a place to put a safe. But, yeah, anyway?
You do understand that laws are postscriptive and only act as deterrent to whatever action they outlaw by way of opening up the offender to punishment in criminal court or litigation in civil court, right? I mean, I think you probably know that, but the way you're talking about laws makes it sound like you think that the act of making a law against an activity somehow literally prevents anyone from performing that activity. Obviously that's not the case, so making any argument about how laws don't stop criminals and that they can be ignored can only lead to advocating anarchy. Every law could be argued to be ineffective because criminals can choose to just not follow them. And then in the same breathe most of those who rail against additional guns control laws advocate for more laws against things like drugs and abortion. IT MAKES NO SENSE!
I have kids and I wanted something that would stop someone from being able to take the guns. We also just recently installed a security camera system and we live in a duplex in a crowded community so most likely anyone who breaks in is probably going to want to stay pretty quiet.
Well if they knew a person had problems they may could keep a closer eye on them ( even if they did not know what kind of guns they had). For example, the FBI, GBI ( GA's version of the FBI) and the school district he attended last year spoke to he and his father about online threats to shoot up a school, BUT they released him as they did not have enough to hold him in custody. This was May 23.
How would a security camera stop anyone from taking the guns? Sure, you’ll know who has taken them but the guns are still gone.
