My Suspended Entropy Challenge

[AV1611VET]

Amen, brother!

I hope you keep posting these challenges, AV. I'm just a little confused and surprised is all but you're doing fine by me! =)

You mean I'm doing fine for your side?

 

[sandwiches]

You mean I'm doing fine for your side?

Absolutely! That's half of the reasons why I usually respond to these 'challenges.'

 

[Freodin]

I'm not sure why anyone posts here, if they can't answer the challenge.

They don't need to prove to me they can't answer it; but trying to find flaws with my wording or saying it didn't happen isn't making any points, as far as I'm concerned.

It's their prerogative though.

If they want to play Ring the Bell, fine; but if they can't do it, don't make it look like the game was rigged.

Oh, but they can answer your "challenge". They answer it in the completely correct way of pointing out that your challenge is wrong.

You might want to reconsider your challenges so that they don't challenge people to do something that is wrong... perhaps then you might get answers more to your gusto.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Ring the Bell[/i], fine; but if they can't do it, don't make it look like the game was rigged.

But the game was rigged Popular Mechanics - Google Books

You're just not happy that people won't play your game but come up with better answers than the one you want.

 

[Tiberius]

Your talking about the traditions of man, not the Bible. There is a reason why the BIBLE is the word of God. NOT man's opinions about the Bible. Think about this, I mean really think about it. The Bible has all the authority of God. Your opinion of the Bible has NONE of the authority of God.

So you give me your opinion, of another persons opinion and none of this has to do with God or the word of God. Have you ever read the Bible? Have you ever even studied the Bible at all? Do you know first hand anything at all about the Bible. Or do you just know man's opinions and what others tell you about it.

So should we listen to your opinion of another man's opinion, or should we look at what God has to say about it.

Of course, the only reason religious folk say this is so that when something is shown to contradict the Bible so well that they can't help but agree (such as the "sun goes around the earth" position that the church held for a long time) they can just blame it on people instead of where the source ultimately is.

Really, if the source of the problem is someone's flawed personal opinion, how do you explain everyone having the same opinion?

 

[mzungu]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

Simple; It wasn't! Now where's my prize

 

[mzungu]

Your talking about the traditions of man, not the Bible. There is a reason why the BIBLE is the word of God. NOT man's opinions about the Bible. Think about this, I mean really think about it. The Bible has all the authority of God. Your opinion of the Bible has NONE of the authority of God.

So you give me your opinion, of another persons opinion and none of this has to do with God or the word of God. Have you ever read the Bible? Have you ever even studied the Bible at all? Do you know first hand anything at all about the Bible. Or do you just know man's opinions and what others tell you about it.

So should we listen to your opinion of another man's opinion, or should we look at what God has to say about it.

God actually spoke to you

 

[AV1611VET]

Simple; It wasn't! Now where's my prize

I somehow don't think this explanation is going to get you acclaimed.

 

[selfinflikted]

Necro'ing your own threads now, are we?

 

[Kylie]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

Easy.

It's just a story.

Prove that it actually happened and then we'll talk.

 

[AV1611VET]

Prove that it actually happened and then we'll talk.

If there was proof that it actually happened, what would there be to talk about?

I love the point my pastor made.

Matthew 27:42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.

Typical unbeliever: "First show me something; then we'll talk."

 

[Mainframes]

Typical unbeliever: "First show me something; then we'll talk."

Somebody asking for evidence? The cheek of it!

 

[Kylie]

If there was proof that it actually happened, what would there be to talk about?

I love the point my pastor made.

Matthew 27:42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.

Typical unbeliever: "First show me something; then we'll talk."

My daughter flew around the living room last night. Let's talk about that. What's that? You don't believe me and want some evidence that it actually happened? Oh please. If I showed you the video I took of it, then what would there be to talk about?

Do you see how ridiculous this line of reasoning is?

 

[AV1611VET]

My daughter flew around the living room last night.

Did she now?

Let's talk about that.

Okay.

What's that? You don't believe me and want some evidence that it actually happened?

You're half right.

I don't believe you, and I don't want evidence.

Evidence is missing one letter: an ell.

Oh please. If I showed you the video I took of it, then what would there be to talk about?

Chriss Angel doing basically the same thing off of a rooftop?

 

[Kylie]

Did she now?

I'll use that next time you post one of your little "challenges". You post, "Prove that God could not have done such and such," and I'll reply, "Oh, did he now?"

Okay.

You start. Go any questions?

You're half right.

I don't believe you, and I don't want evidence.

Evidence is missing one letter: an ell.

Then you are missing out on the truth. What a shame. Do you think the TRUTH can take a hike?

Chriss Angel doing basically the same thing off of a rooftop?

So you agree that there is still stuff to talk about, even if evidence is provided!

So I guess that when you said:

If there was proof that it actually happened, what would there be to talk about?

I love the point my pastor made.

Matthew 27:42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.

Typical unbeliever: "First show me something; then we'll talk."

You were just blowing smoke, huh?

 

[Strathos]

I really don't see the point of this, other than boosting your post count

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

Then explain the compatibility between the Pauli Exclusion Principle and infinite mass in zero volume?????

Because not only do you have two residing in the same space, but infinite particles all occupying a single point.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Explain this phenomenon ...

Deuteronomy 29:5 And I have led you forty years in the wilderness: your clothes are not waxen old upon you, and thy shoe is not waxen old upon thy foot.

... in such a way as to pass peer review and get acclaim in physics for showing how the second law of thermodynamics was suspended back then.

It's your story -- you explain it.

 

[AV1611VET]

It's your story -- you explain it.

Sure.

Science took a hike.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Sure.

Science took a hike.

So why do you need us to disagree with you?