I’m just using your own argument against you. Again. You have no basis to say I’m wrong. All you have is personal feelings.
I have never forced my morality on you.
Upvote
0
I’m just using your own argument against you. Again. You have no basis to say I’m wrong. All you have is personal feelings.
That depends whether person A actually caused person's B's death or merely didn't prevent it from happening. I already covered this.
But if I force mine on you, you have no basis to say it’s wrong.I have never forced my morality on you.
But if I force mine on you, you have no basis to say it’s wrong.
If I like your Hermes and decide to take don't try toYes I do. Because no one has the right to push their morality onto others. Your morality applies to you, not other people.
If I like your Hermes and decide to take don't try to
your morality on me with some objection.
Yes I do. Because no one has the right to push their morality onto others. Your morality applies to you, not other people.
You have proposed this as a moral principle.
Why should we accept this principle, that morality is individual, and does not apply to others?
And isn't it forcing your morality on the unborn child to abort it?
Would you like it if a vegan forced their morality onto you and stopped you from eating animal products?
Would you like it if a Muslim forced their morality onto you and forced you to be a Muslim?
First of all, I don't hold that a fertilized egg is a person, in the same way that I don't hold that an acorn is an oak tree.
Secondly, we humans have the right to bodily autonomy.
We even extend that right to corpses, which is why it's unlawful to remove organs from a dead person if they have said that they do not want to be an organ donor. If we tell pregnant people that they must continue with a pregnancy, then we are saying that a pregnant person has less rights than a corpse.
Would you like it if a vegan forced their morality onto you and stopped you from eating animal products?
Because no one has the right to push their morality onto others. Your morality applies to you, not other people.
Secondly, we humans have the right to bodily autonomy.
But then isn't that something that you are taking from your own ethical system and asking me to apply?
But then I also don't hold to subjective morality. So we may need to compare notes for me to understand your view.
Now you just extended your subjective morality to others, when you said "humans" have the right to bodily autonomy. It seems you are again stating a moral principle that applies to more than just yourself. It sounds like you actually do have a set of principles that you think apply to people, beyond just yourself.
A fertilized egg is a life, with its own unique characteristics. And it is human, not bovine, or reptilian, etc. You are extending your moral principle to all humanity, yet you withhold it for the most helpless human life.
Ironically you extend more rights to a corpse than you do to a human life that is developing. But you also set down moral principles that you wish to extend to others beyond yourself.
So let's clarify some things. If someone murdered and ate you, and that was completely consistent with their own ethical system, would that be a problem? They are not imposing their view of morality, just killing and eating you. You don't have to agree that killing and eating people is a problem.
Your subjective morality has two principles--so far-- that you apply to all people, and one appears to me to be self-contradictory.
1. no one has the right to push their morality onto others. Your morality applies to you, not other people.
If each person's morality only applies to themselves, how can you say that this principle applies to everyone? What if they don't think this principle applies? It may be your principle, but @Hammster already proposed that his morality may in fact require imposing on others.
2. we humans have the right to bodily autonomy.
How do we know everyone has this as a component of their morality? For instance, the US government officials who intentionally infected people with sexually transmitted diseases in Guatemala, to study the results, didn't seem to hold the view that each person has a right to bodily autonomy.
US apologizes for infecting Guatemalans with STDs in the 1940s - CNN.com
Those who sterilized populations they thought were inferior, for the sake of "improving" humanity didn't seem to hold to that view.
Bodily autonomy had to be fought for by appealing to various arguments, rather than just being something that everyone subjectively holds.
Are there other principles that you see applying to everyone?
So just to ensure that I understand you, you are saying that it’s wrong to push morality on someone else. Do I have that right?Yes I do. Because no one has the right to push their morality onto others. Your morality applies to you, not other people.
So just to ensure that I understand you, you are saying that it’s wrong to push morality on someone else. Do I have that right?
Actually, I’d like you to answer the question so I know if I understand you correctly.And you will now no doubt say that abortion is doing that.
To which I say that a fertilized egg is not a person.
Ah, so you can see how forcing some moral system is wrong.
I don't hold to objective morality.
No, I just hold that there isn't a person alive who has the right to make me use my body in a way that I don't want.
Irrational, at best.First of all, I don't hold that a fertilized egg is a person, in the same way that I don't hold that an acorn is an oak tree.
Bizarre, at best. Now your kidney donor has died on the operating table. Do you know that an organ donor must be alive for their organs to have any use? Apparently, not.Secondly, we humans have the right to bodily autonomy. We even extend that right to corpses, which is why it's unlawful to remove organs from a dead person if they have said that they do not want to be an organ donor. If we tell pregnant people that they must continue with a pregnancy, then we are saying that a pregnant person has less rights than a corpse.
Do you hold that an acorn is a oak tree?
A fertilized egg is not a person.
If you can find someone who thinks that it's acceptable for another person to push their morality onto them, then please show me.
But isn't it funny how the only people who say that are the ones who want to push their morality onto others, and never those who want others to push their morality onto them?