• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

My FTS Challenge

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How is this a game of KotM?
AV1611VET: God is self existent.

Scientific Methodists: No He isn't, the universe is.

Which one belongs at the top of the mountain?

God or the universe?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chesterton
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Well if you want to turn this into a game of King of the Mountain, the Bible wins by default.

Good thing, then:

1. This isn't a game of King of the Moutain
2. The Bible wins nothing by default.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
AV1611VET: God is self existent.

Scientific Methodists: No He isn't, the universe is.

Which one belongs at the top of the mountain?

God or the universe?

If you want to play that game, the "winner" would be the one that indisputably exists.

Universe:1 God:0
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Twisting words is fun and proves absolutely nothing, AV.
You mean like calling a child in the womb a "fetus," or calling miracles "magic"?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mobezom

Active Member
Oct 30, 2016
214
62
26
Menomonie, Wisconsin
✟24,680.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You mean like called a child in the womb a "fetus," or calling miracles "magic"?
Fetus: what would you have me call one? A child? Not specific enough. An "unborn child"? Not sciency enough. Fetus, embryo, zygote, gamete, these are the scientific terms. It doesn't mean that a fetus isn't human, any more than calling an adult human an "adult" makes them not-human.

Magic: magic is what lies beyond the edge of science and knowledge; it is "here be dragons," it is "it just works." Magic is anything that hasn't been analyzed yet, tested and reproduced yet. Sci-fi has magic coming out the wazoo, ferex. Most "magic" isn't real, like fairies and magic wands, but nuclear power and nuclear bombs would seem like magic to the Founding Fathers, even in the early 1900s. Magic doesn't mean wrong or bad, it just means "not scienced yet".
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Fetus: what would you have me call one? A child? Not specific enough.
It's too bad children have to die because you guys can't get "specific enough."
Mobezom said:
Magic: magic is what lies beyond the edge of science and knowledge;
So are miracles.

There are some things miracles can do that magic can't ... as Pharaoh's magicians found out.

That doesn't warrant you guys plutoing the term "miracles" to "magic."
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
It's too bad children have to die because you guys can't get "specific enough."

You'd prefer they die because God commands it?

There are some things miracles can do that magic can't ... as Pharaoh's magicians found out.

Or... pharaoh's magicians got out-magiced... No matter how good you are, there's always someone better...
 
Upvote 0

Mobezom

Active Member
Oct 30, 2016
214
62
26
Menomonie, Wisconsin
✟24,680.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
It's too bad children have to die because you guys can't get "specific enough."So are miracles.
Calling a fetus a fetus doesn't justify abortion. Unlike you, I don't achieve my goals by twisting words until I am defined to have won.

Even if we assumed that a fetus was a child, a human being, with all the rights that entails, biology would still use the term fetus. Same as with gamete, zygote, embryo, etc. "Oh, but they dehumanize the baby!"? So does medicine, by that definition. Biology is coldly objective.

But biology doesn't say anything about when a human life begins. It can help us understand when human cognition begins (neuroscience and whatnot), but abortion is more of a philosophical issue than a scientific one.

Now, why on earth would you want the term "fetus" to go unused? Oh, I know! If the only terms for fetuses were emotionally charged words, it would reinforce your religious dogma. It's 1984 all over again - shape the language and you shape the speakers. Yeah, no [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ing way AV, I'll call a fetus a fetus.
There are some things miracles can do that magic can't ... as Pharaoh's magicians found out.
There are some things race cars can do that automobiles can't... as the tractor racer found out.

Sounds like nonsense? It is. By this definition of magic which I gave, miracles are a subset of "magic." So is sci-fi handwavium. Miracles are deity-related magic, that's all. According to your book, your magic is the best magic and nobody else's magic can beat it - okaaaay? Nice narrative you've got there...
That doesn't warrant you guys plutoing the term "miracles" to "magic."
You wanna talk Pluto? Sure, let's talk Pluto.

Pluto is weird. It's not like the other terrestrial planets - it's further out, it hasn't cleared its orbit, it's rather small, etc. So it gets a new category - dwarf planets. (Additionally, it gives its name to plutoids and plutinos, which are, respectively, trans-Neptunian dwarf planets and bodies in a 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune.)

We now have three kinds of planets - terrestrial planets, Jovian planets, and dwarf planets. The dwarf planets wouldn't fit well in the terrestrial part, so they get their own room. Additionally, the term "planet", as it has traditionally been used, refers to the several large bodies around the Sun, not the smaller ones, so we group the first two together and call them "planets".

It's just a name - it's the easiest and best way of grouping the planetary-mass objects around the Sun.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Pluto is weird.
When did Pluto start becoming "weird"? in 2006?
Mobezom said:
It's not like the other terrestrial planets - it's further out, it hasn't cleared its orbit, it's rather small, etc.
And how long was that known before Pluto suddenly came down with the "weirds"?
Mobezom said:
So it gets a new category - dwarf planets.
Ya ... by way of a rigged vote.
 
Upvote 0

Mobezom

Active Member
Oct 30, 2016
214
62
26
Menomonie, Wisconsin
✟24,680.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
When did Pluto start becoming "weird"? in 2006?
As soon as it was discovered; nay, as soon as it began to exist. Pluto isn't like the terrestrial planets.
And how long was that known before Pluto suddenly came down with the "weirds"?
Until we found more dwarf planets, we thought that one oddball was fine, but we didn't want to invite dozens of dwarf planets to the party...
Ya ... by way of a rigged vote.
It's just a name! If you want Pluto to be a planet, consider PMOs to be planets and rename "planet" to "normal planet", your choice, but our standard terminology is this way.
 
Upvote 0

Mobezom

Active Member
Oct 30, 2016
214
62
26
Menomonie, Wisconsin
✟24,680.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Then why did [unqualified] scientists have to rig a vote, if Pluto's reclassification was so convincing?
Convincing? No. People like Pluto. They saw this as a "demotion". But it's really not.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So much for your self-existent universe then, if you have to invoke Harry Potter and evict God.

Way to miss the point.

BTW, I never invoked Harry Potter to explain the formation of the universe, did I?
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Thank you, Kylie. (May I call you KTS?)

Feel free to call me Kylie if you like. I only have the KTS user name because Kyliue was already taken. So I used my initials.

In the face of evolution I try to remain good-Natured, and as I said, I don't want to offend anyone. Evolutionary scientists make this stuff called powdered milk, it's very dry and I can barely drink it. Still, we don't discriminate based on race, color or cream, so what prima facie looked to be a statement of fact (although it did not do the looking, it was actually the thing looked at) I understood as colloquialism, and for various reasons legal and moral I deemed it prudent for all concerned to ignore what you said. Fetishes are, heartbreakingly, not mine for the inducing.

My point was that evolution provided us with salivary glands because lubricated food is easier to swallow. If we did not have saliva glands, we would find it extremely painful to swallow. Of course, saliva is not the same as water...
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
When did Pluto start becoming "weird"? in 2006?And how long was that known before Pluto suddenly came down with the "weirds"?Ya ... by way of a rigged vote.

Not every vote is weird just because they disregard your input...
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Then why did [unqualified] scientists have to rig a vote, if Pluto's reclassification was so convincing?

Are they "[unqualified]" because you didn't get a chance to qualify them?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not every vote is weird just because they disregard your input...
They disregarded a LOT of peoples' input.

They made sure of that; even breaking the rules to do it.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,190
52,656
Guam
✟5,150,263.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are they "[unqualified]" because you didn't get a chance to qualify them?
Nope.

They effectively filtered out the qualified ones; viz., the planetary astronomers.
 
Upvote 0