Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Something of an omission from the bible as well.
There is no such thing as operational Science vs. historical Science. That is a lie manufactured by AIG when it became clear that they sounded like idiots.What I was referencing was scientific assumptions about what happened in the past and common ancestry ideas. Much different than operational science in the here and now which you study.
Just to drive the point home, here's a list of confirmed and unconfirmed craters.
List of impact craters on Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ED, you might notice that there are about 50 of these and they all dwarf the 85 foot impact you're talking about. The smallest one is about 1,200 times bigger than the impact you mentioned. The largest is about 19,000 times bigger. You do understand the concept that the larger a crater is, the bigger the explosion and resulting damage, correct? And that's not even getting into the unconfirmed ones.
Just look at this:
They're all over the place. And nobody thought this was worth writing down? You keep saying the Bible is some accurate history book, but it's funny how it missed the days when HELLFIRE WAS RAINING FROM THE SKY.
And I'd also like to point out the reason the meteorite you're talking about didn't kill anyone was because it landed in a sparsely populated area. If it had hit in a major city, there would have been casualties. I honestly don't even get your argument. It's like you don't understand that asteroids vary in size, and some of them are really, REALLY big.
I'm wondering if any one else has noticed that Asia,the eastern section of Russia and the equatorial areas have been mostly spared by the biggies?
Most have been found from the air..
population numbers may have a roll in the discoveries of them,but I don't think it would be an overwhelming factor.
Some others have not. Some are the result of intensive geologic surveys.
The other overwhelming factor is conditions such as the Siberian traps covered massive areas of Asia in lava, covering up the impact craters below. The geologic history of the region also weighs heavily on the ease of discovery.
I'm wondering if any one else has noticed that Asia,the eastern section of Russia and the equatorial areas have been mostly spared by the biggies?
I'm going to pull an AV and say that God put a protective dome over them..nah,that's to easy...
The oceans being spared?..nobody in their right mind would expect craters on the water's surface..
Not much escapes aerial the tools at the disposal of geologists..that is how some of the most eroded craters have been found.
Giant Ancient Impact Crater Confirmed in Iowa
from the article..
Of course, most ancient impact structures on Earth go unnoticed, right beneath our feet. The advent of aerial photography just before World War II led to the discovery of several new craters such as circular Clearwater Lakes in the remote reaches of Quebec. Impact craters have even been found in the Australian Outback by dedicated sleuths using Google Earth and doubtless more are waiting to be found. One only has to look at the record preserved on the battered face of the Moon to realize its a cosmic shooting gallery out there.
from the article..
Of course, most ancient impact structures on Earth go unnoticed, right beneath our feet. The advent of aerial photography just before World War II led to the discovery of several new craters such as circular Clearwater Lakes in the remote reaches of Quebec. Impact craters have even been found in the Australian Outback by dedicated sleuths using Google Earth and doubtless more are waiting to be found. One only has to look at the record preserved on the battered face of the Moon to realize its a cosmic shooting gallery out there.
There is no such thing as operational Science vs. historical Science. That is a lie manufactured by AIG when it became clear that they sounded like idiots.
Is there such a thing as a living dinosaur or are we left with only old bones? If there is no such thing as historical science then why do we have so many hypothesis as to what wiped out the dinosaurs and what they actually looked like?
If you want to call that operational science then show me a living T-Rex we can examine today. As apposed to the discovery and invention of the light bulb, testing of how volcanoes work, chasing tornadoes, discovering new vaccines, etc.
Is there such a thing as a living dinosaur or are we left with only old bones? If there is no such thing as historical science then why do we have so many hypothesis as to what wiped out the dinosaurs and what they actually looked like?
If you want to call that operational science then show me a living T-Rex we can examine today. As apposed to the discovery and invention of the light bulb, testing of how volcanoes work, chasing tornadoes, discovering new vaccines, etc.
I think the speaker would ask that you prove that proclamation before he even entertained the rest of it.Maybe you could ask the speaker how he feels about the majority of christians in the world believing in evolution and if he thinks they are genuine christians.
Maybe you could ask the speaker how he feels about the majority of christians in the world believing in evolution and if he thinks they are genuine christians.
I do not know of any polls specifically on Christians but the polls we do have tend to support the idea that most Christians accept evolution in some form.I think the speaker would ask that you prove that proclamation before he even entertained the rest of it.
Global Belief in Supreme Being(s) and Afterlife Accepted By Half (51%) of Citizens in 23 Country Survey, But Only 28% Are Creationists
Ipsos Global @dvisory: Supreme Being(s), the Afterlife and Evolution | Ipsos41% identify as evolutionist's 28% global citizens refer to themselves as creationists 31% simply don't know.
A majority of white evangelical Protestants (64%) and half of black Protestants (50%) say that humans have existed in their present form since the beginning of time. But in other large religious groups, a minority holds this view. In fact, nearly eight-in-ten white mainline Protestants (78%) say that humans and other living things have evolved over time. Three-quarters of the religiously unaffiliated (76%) and 68% of white non-Hispanic Catholics say the same. About half of Hispanic Catholics (53%) believe that humans have evolved over time, while 31% reject that idea.
Public?s Views on Human Evolution | Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life ProjectPew Research Center 2013 analysis, six-in-ten Americans (60%) say that humans and other living things have evolved over time, while a third (33%) reject the idea of evolution,
Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design | Gallup Historical Trends42% created in current form, 19% evolved-no God involved, 31% evolution with God involved
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?