No one ever claimed a tsunami lasted an entire year.
So what did you mean when you said this:
I know they attempted to date it but you know my thoughts on that.
Looks to me like this probably happened at the beginning of the flood
and helped trigger it.
So what is this if not you saying that the flood was caused by a tsunami, which would mean the waters would have to persist for the better part of a year? It would help if you'd actually take the time to clarify what your position is - you keep complaining that you're being misrepresented, but that's what happens when you don't explain what your stance is. An intelligent discussion requires that both parties know and understand where the other side stands. That's why, in any formal debate, both sides will typically state the position their defending from the outset, so there's no question about what they are and are not arguing. You've outright refused to do this. Personally, I just think it's a way for you to endlessly shift the goalposts.
Put your cards on table and we can deal properly.
Upvote
0