My Evolution Challenge

[sbvera13]

AV if you don't mind me asking, what are the purposes of your threads? I have seen so many threads like this where the answer you want is silly and self-defeating, or just straight up pointless.

This is his purpose. He want's to stoke his own ego.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7405523-7/#post53083436

 

[The Lady Kate]

You do know that the earth reversed its magnetic field in AD 58, causing the poles to switch?

And that Nero blamed it on the Christians?

I've lurked here long enough to know you made that one up... but thank you for demonstrating what "incompetence" would look like... not that there was any further need.

 

[LifeToTheFullest!]

If you're using the bible to make postdictions, then you could make a strong case for Nostradamus being just aa accurate as the bible.

Predicted the internet, indeed. Please.

 

[AV1611VET]

I've lurked here long enough to know you made that one up.

--- nuts!

 

[azmurath]

You do know that the earth reversed its magnetic field in AD 58, causing the poles to switch?

And that Nero blamed it on the Christians?

This is a bold faced lie. The last magnetic reversal, the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal, occured 780,000 years ago. Magnetic reversals don't happen in the blink of an eye, they occur gradually over hundreds or thousands of years. The next reversal should begin in about 2000-3000 years.

 

[MoonLancer]

i keep hearing it will happen in 2012 lol. something about the Mayan end of the world.

 

[Wedjat]

AV, why do you keep doing stuff like this? I'm actually starting to think that you're trying to make a joke out of yourself, that you are actually one of the most dedicated satire artists in the world.

 

[MrGoodBytes]

Guess again --- the Bible is more up-to-date than you think.

If It can support the Internet and an expanding universe, It can deny evolution.

Sure, as long as the Internet is made of lightning and heaven is the physical universe, the Bible supports both of these.

 

[AV1611VET]

This is a bold faced lie. The last magnetic reversal, the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal, occured 780,000 years ago. Magnetic reversals don't happen in the blink of an eye, they occur gradually over hundreds or thousands of years. The next reversal should begin in about 2000-3000 years.

Excuse me --- the Bible says it, that settles it.

Why do you think the Bible portrays those living in Samaria as going "up" to the city, if Samaria wasn't south of Jerusalem?

Everything is "gradual" to you guys --- instantaneous to us, though ---

 

[AV1611VET]

AV, why do you keep doing stuff like this? I'm actually starting to think that you're trying to make a joke out of yourself, that you are actually one of the most dedicated satire artists in the world.

I want a resumé like you gave dad ---

I can tell we're making an impression on you guys, we're the 'nutjobs'.

 

[Wedjat]

Sorry AV, you're just too funny to rant at like I did with Dad.

 

[AV1611VET]

Sorry AV, you're just too funny to rant at like I did with Dad.

Oh, alright ---

 

[Cabal]

I want a resumé like you gave dad ---

I can tell we're making an impression on you guys, we're the 'nutjobs'.

Yeah, they're just flocking to change their icons in the face of such utter ignorance, aren't they?

 

[Cabal]

Excuse me --- the Bible says it, that settles it.

Why do you think the Bible portrays those living in Samaria as going "up" to the city, if Samaria wasn't south of Jerusalem?

Everything is "gradual" to you guys --- instantaneous to us, though ---

Gee, I dunno - maybe because it's on a HILL?

And I suppose God just embedded all the spins the other way in every single magnetic rock on the planet so we wouldn't notice, hmm?

 

[AV1611VET]

Gee, I dunno - maybe because it's on a HILL?

Is that why Nero persecuted Christians, because they built Jerusalem on a hill?

Newsflash: Christians didn't build Jerusalem.

 

[Cabal]

Theistic Evolutionists, please show me from the Bible how Adam and Eve got here via evolution.

I personally believe they are incipients.

If, in your opinion, the Bible doesn't say, please admit as much.

Please don't be offended if later, I use this thread to show that you have no Biblical* support for your theory.

* Note: 'Biblical support' --- not 'scientific support'.

Please respond with book, chapter and verse; or admit there's nothing there.

You want me, someone who admits that they interpret, to justify an interpretation to you, a "literalist"?

 

[Cabal]

Is that why Nero persecuted Christians, because they built Jerusalem on a hill?

Newsflash: Christians didn't build Jerusalem.

What does that have to do with anything?

Going UP to the city. On a hill.

The city on a hill.

Going UP a hill.

Yes?

 

[AV1611VET]

You want me, someone who admits that they interpret, to justify an interpretation to you, a "literalist"?

That's the point I'm making.

You need a verse first, before you can interpret it.

And you don't have one.

 

[Cabal]

That's the point I'm making.

You need a verse first, before you can interpret it.

And you don't have one.

Who says I can't? But this has already been discussed elsewhere, and you won't accept it, so why bother?

As I said, you do the exact same thing as us, only we don't deny it. So come back to the discussion when you're no longer in denial and capable of being consistent.

 

[AV1611VET]

Who says I can't?

I do.

How can you interpret something you don't have?