My Cotton Challenge

[AV1611VET]

What we've got here is one person claiming to be an eye witness,

Just like with my dad.

And for the record, that 'one person claiming to be an eye witness [sic]' was, in fact, a participant.

She wasn't watching the show, she starred in it.

... and several other more credible witnesses saying it didn't happen.

What makes them 'more credible'? their DNA?

 

[AV1611VET]

I know that. I was being sarcastic.

Oh, sorry.

All this evolution propagation flying around right now has me trigger happy.

 

[[serious]]

It's stupid.

Would you be happy with a similar answer to your threads? I can explain the rationale of my challenge if you'd like, that's more than you've been willing to do generally.

 

[[serious]]

Just like with my dad.

And for the record, that 'one person claiming to be an eye witness [sic]' was, in fact, a participant.

She wasn't watching the show, she starred in it.What makes them 'more credible'? their DNA?

It can be more firmly established that Darwin's children met Darwin than that cotton met darwin, yes.

 

[AV1611VET]

It can be more firmly established that Darwin's children met Darwin than that cotton met darwin, yes.

Ditto for my dad's children.

But a preacher led him to the LORD, and my siblings disagree.

So I've seen how this Lady Hope story works firsthand.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

And what does have to do with either creation or evolution?

 

[AV1611VET]

And what does have to do with either creation or evolution?

Isn't Darwin considered the Father of Evolution?

If he was, I'm tempted to say Succubus was the mother, but I'll go with one of the muses instead.

(Interesting that the nine muses are females, isn't it?)

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Isn't Darwin considered the Father of Evolution?

If he was, I'm tempted to say Succubus was the mother, but I'll go with one of the muses instead.

(Interesting that the nine muses are females, isn't it?)

Still doesn't answer my question.

 

[AV1611VET]

Still doesn't answer my question.

You're asking me what the Father of Evolution has to do with evolution?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You're asking me what the Father of Evolution has to do with evolution?

No, that's not what I'm asking. I'm asking why the OP that you wrote: "An evangelist led Charles Darwin to the LORD before Mr. Darwin passed away. Is that good news or bad?" has anything to do with either creation or evolution.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, that's not what I'm asking. I'm asking why the OP that you wrote: "An evangelist led Charles Darwin to the LORD before Mr. Darwin passed away. Is that good news or bad?" has anything to do with either creation or evolution.

I like stirring the pot?

Besides, how one answers tells volumes about them.

That's why my challenges usually aren't answered.

And this thread is no exception.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I like stirring the pot?

Besides, how one answers tells volumes about them.

That's why my challenges usually aren't answered.

And this thread is no exception.

No, you just like writing nonsense. That is it. It's not stirring the pot, it's not a challenge. It's you writing nonsense so that people will notice you.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, you just like writing nonsense. That is it. It's not stirring the pot, it's not a challenge. It's you writing nonsense so that people will notice you.

Then why'd you ask?

And that's kinda rich, coming from someone who likes to start storms so he can be a warden.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Then why'd you ask?

I would like to be pleasantly when you finally write a challenge thread that is actually a challenge and not just in your own head.

And that's kinda rich, coming from someone who likes to start storms so he can be a warden.

You are reading WAAAY to much in to my username. And FYI, it's a homage to this. Or these, rather.

 

[AV1611VET]

.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

You mean like here ?

The link is not working.

So you're role playing them against Christian doctrine?

And the point I was trying to make just went right over your head...

 

[AV1611VET]

The link is not working.

Hmmm ... you're right.

I'll mess with it and see if I can get it to work.

It's actually a thread started by Strathos challenging me to make a legitimate challenge that would satisfy even his strict taste on what a valid challenge should be ... so I did.

And the point I was trying to make just went right over your head...

What bothers me, Warden, about you and other "youngsters," is that you're only 22, yet you exhibit a venom toward even basic doctrine that can only come from years and years of being exposed to science.

And that's sad.

It's like each generation is becoming more and more intolerant of the things of God.

But then I suppose I should just chalk it up to a "sign of the times," eh?

The tares will eventually outgrow the wheat and choke it out.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

.What bothers me, Warden, about you and other "youngsters," is that you're only 22, yet you exhibit a venom toward even basic doctrine that can only come from years and years of being exposed to science.

And that's sad.

It's like each generation is becoming more and more intolerant of the things of God.

But then I suppose I should just chalk it up to a "sign of the times," eh?

It's not 'basic doctrine'. It's you putting your own interpretation of scripture on a whole level ABOVE the facts that we see from God's creation. That's what many people take issue with.

Although, I cannot really see any venom in my posts. Annoyance, aye, that does come through, but venom? That's taking it a bit too far on your end, no?

 

[AV1611VET]

Although, I cannot really see any venom in my posts. Annoyance, aye, that does come through, but venom? That's taking it a bit too far on your end, no?

Fair dinkum.

My apologies.

 

[Bugeyedcreepy]

I thought I mentioned why she did it.

Hate had nothing to do with it.

Just the opposite; she did it with love in mind.

I can see why she did it ... can you?

If you can't, maybe you should study their doctrine a little more; instead of equating her with atheism.

This Steven Weinberg quote is apt right about now...: "With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."