Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Scientists do not neglect manure.The thing is that scientist usually neglect to circle of life. The carbohydrates i eat to day was once on the feild of barley, was once manure, was once hay, was once menure was once hay...! or am I wrong?
how do we generate carbon once again?
Well the idea is there, is it not?
No, but dissent with an old mythical tale of creation (both of them; G1&2) gives one enough credibility to open "museums" and adventure parks with the intent of fleecing the flock.Having an idea isn't proof.
This is something creationists need to let penetrate their skulls - science thrives on dissent WITH evidence. Dissent alone does not give you credibility.
a day. however generally if it were from a more creationistic standpoint there would not a tree to begin with.I cut down a 1000-year-old tree, hollow it out and make a canoe out of it; all in a day's time.
How old is the canoe when I'm finished?
The fusion reaction in massive stars forms carbon.
So you are saying that carbon is actually just as old as the solarsystem?
The carbon here on earth is likely from the life cycle of a previously existed star.
No, it is constantly replenished by the action of cosmic rays on the nitrogen in the atmosphere. That’s one of the reasons why it can be used for radiometric dating of organic substances. Why can’t you investigate these things for yourself.So its even older then our solar system according to science. How about C-14 is it also older?
I don't know. But I do know the moral tale of the Innuit tribesman paddling the a river in his kayak. Through carelessness he had forgotten to don his full array of clothing and thus found himself, overnight, in danger of freezing to death. To counter this he cut some of the fabric from his kayak and made a fire to heat himself up. This preserved him till morning, when he set out for home. Unfortunately the kayak was so weakened by the removal of the material that it sank and he drowned. This proved the admonition known to many of us:How old is the canoe when I'm finished?
That's pretty funny! Did you make that up yourself?You can't have your kayak and heat it.
When people like this guy get desperate, I say let them eat kayak.I don't know. But I do know the moral tale of the Innuit tribesman paddling the a river in his kayak. Through carelessness he had forgotten to don his full array of clothing and thus found himself, overnight, in danger of freezing to death. To counter this he cut some of the fabric from his kayak and made a fire to heat himself up. This preserved him till morning, when he set out for home. Unfortunately the kayak was so weakened by the removal of the material that it sank and he drowned. This proved the admonition known to many of us:
You can't have your kayak and heat it.
Sadly no. There was a comedy radio program, panel game format, on the BBC in the 1950s and 60s part of which involved impromptu explanations of quotations and sayings by the two regular panelists. This was one example.That's pretty funny! Did you make that up yourself?![]()
LOLSadly no. There was a comedy radio program, panel game format, on the BBC in the 1950s and 60s part of which involved impromptu explanations of quotations and sayings by the two regular panelists. This was one example.
Sometimes you have to wait half a century or more for an appropriate opportunity to retell them.![]()
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cant-Have-Your-Kayak-Heat/dp/B000PJH3OMSadly no. There was a comedy radio program, panel game format, on the BBC in the 1950s and 60s part of which involved impromptu explanations of quotations and sayings by the two regular panelists. This was one example.
Sometimes you have to wait half a century or more for an appropriate opportunity to retell them.![]()
That's them: Frank Muir and Dennis Norden. Important contributors to post-war British comedy. They were, in my view, more effective togther than as individuals.https://www.amazon.co.uk/Cant-Have-Your-Kayak-Heat/dp/B000PJH3OM
These fellas? It's how they tells them.
I remember one about the Chinaman or Indian man who got suited up in Harrod's (in a kilt) and then started to weep for the loss of empire. ("but Sir is weeping")
I liked Muir the better of the two.
Denis Norden only died in 2018That's them: Frank Muir and Dennis Norden. Important contributors to post-war British comedy. They were, in my view, more effective togther than as individuals.