Gotcha.not sure what you meant . The preacher I talked about proposed killing and abusing gays . I’ll repeat. He deserved to be made persona non grata
Yes but the public will never agree on what is biased. And all journalists are biased. I look for sources that give a lot of verifiable information, and do investigative journalism. Yet many people here would consider those sources biased since the journalists themselves are liberal and the facts presented support a liberal worldview.I do think the public can do a better job of keeping the media honest, though. We should not support biased journalism. This requires significant cultural change but the Fourth Estate should serve without fear or favour.
Expressing disapproval or saying anything unflattering about Persons of Politically Privileged Pigmentation or Perversion.What is "hate speech" exactly?
So, What is "politically privileged pigmentation? And who decides if something is Perverted.Expressing disapproval or saying anything unflattering about Persons of Politically Privileged Pigmentation or Perversion.
Who or what are you responding to? Certainly not the OP.Yes, but American politics, conservative or otherwise, is not the Gospel. Ridiculing someone for their race/heritage is not part of the gospel. Encouraging harassment is not the gospel. I would say that mocking someone for their sin, whatever it is, is not part of the gospel. One's ability to make money from those pursuits has nothing to do with the Gospel of Jesus Christ either (source).
Character assassination? Not unheard of with the Left. Rather sophomoric in my opinion, attacking personally rather than addressing the issues raised in the OP.Yes the OP.
The fact people are trying to spin the reality to the narrative that fits their persecution complex doesn't change the facts.
Character assassination? Not unheard of with the Left. Rather sophomoric in my opinion, attacking personally rather than addressing the issues raised in the OP.
Well gee I dunno: Who decides what is hateful? You? Who would you trust to censor you for being hateful, perverted, dishonest, etc?So, What is "politically privileged pigmentation? And who decides if something is Perverted.
Would you support a law penalizing, with jail or fines, hate speech against the pre-born?Ahh so because I don't think everyone is out to get me that makes me left? Okay buddy boy lol.
Here is the issue. People are being accused of "hate speech" when you are simply stating facts that the offended simply doesn't like. Or, bringing to light a truthful issue that goes against their beliefs. Or, simply stating an opinion that the other person disagrees with.Well gee I dunno: Who decides what is hateful? You? Who would you trust to censor you for being hateful, perverted, dishonest, etc?
Politically Privileged Pigmentation is when you can have lower grades, scores, aptitude, higher violence, etc, but be held less accountable and still gain access, promotions, etc.
Not to stir the pot, but, I'm having an issue with trying to figure out an example of "hate speech" against a pre-born.Would you support a law penalizing, with jail or fines, hate speech against the pre-born?
Hi and thanks for the response;. God bless you.Be careful about accusing others of being nihilists because of their views on the end times. My faith and ambition in Christ is not reliant upon the current or future state of the world.
I'll not get into the rapture debate but regardless of you view on this, do you think the world will be in a state of this great awakening and then, POOF, everyone's following the Anti-Christ?
A demographic of identified Christians is not necessarily representative of the genuiness of all such Christians. The Great Awakenings occurred as a response to Christian identified societies that were recognizably decaying morally.No, the world must decline to that point over time. Using the great awakening during John Wesley's time is a perfect example actually. He lived in the 1700's. Compare that to today. Britain was somewhere in the lower 90% Christian already. The rest of Europe was probably somewhere around that
In terms of law and policy, we now have a President that has done more to further the Christian agenda in the US than any other US president in recent history. That of course is contrary to pre-Rapture inevitable decline claims.We had entire Christian continents and empires. Can you say that about today? A previous sitting U.S. President stated in front of the world that we are no longer a Christian nation.
You're conflating issues. I believe you are presenting some straw-men as well.Yes, but American politics, conservative or otherwise, is not the Gospel. Ridiculing someone for their race/heritage is not part of the gospel. Encouraging harassment is not the gospel. I would say that mocking someone for their sin, whatever it is, is not part of the gospel. One's ability to make money from those pursuits has nothing to do with the Gospel of Jesus Christ either (source).
Another straw-man. Come on now.Ahh so because I don't think everyone is out to get me that makes me left? Okay buddy boy lol.
I have pondered that. I am not a professional philosopher, but is there really any such thing as "hate speech." There is speech that contains anti-biblical hate, but to describe the entirety of a speech as "hate" seems illogical since speech is no more hate than hate is speech.What is "hate speech" exactly?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?