Did anyone actually read 1984 and understand what newspeak was? The book spends a good deal discussing the topic, yet no one has applied it properly here.That’s how it’s gets assimilated.
Upvote
0
Did anyone actually read 1984 and understand what newspeak was? The book spends a good deal discussing the topic, yet no one has applied it properly here.That’s how it’s gets assimilated.
They'll have to introduce a Sloppy Joan, lol.Awe man!! ConAgra and Hunts food corporation will be very displeased to learn that they must now change the name of their sloppy joe mix to “Personwhich or Peoplewhich”.
Did anyone actually read and understand what was? The book spends a good deal discussing the topic, yet no one has applied it properly here.
No, it's fine to call it newspeak. The most important similarity is that unlike natural, free democratic language development, this is being dictated by dictators who want to control your thinking.Did anyone actually read 1984 and understand what newspeak was? The book spends a good deal discussing the topic, yet no one has applied it properly here.
Yes, elected officials are now dictators.No, it's fine to call it newspeak. The most important similarity is that unlike natural, free democratic language development, this is being dictated by dictators who want to control your thinking.
My point is that your type of take on it is the problem.Did anyone actually read 1984 and understand what newspeak was? The book spends a good deal discussing the topic, yet no one has applied it properly here.
They'll have to introduce a Sloppy Joan, lol.
But how 'bout this? I don't know what triggers me more - the name, or "boneless ribs".
This is just too perfect!You have to start calling them A person, duh!
No, it's fine to call it newspeak. The most important similarity is that unlike natural, free democratic language development, this is being dictated by dictators who want to control your thinking.
Note they were woke enough to protect the feelings of pregnant men, too.
THIS IS GETTING SICK: Berkeley CA Bans Word “Manhole”; Changes It To “Maintenance Hole”
Pot holes are the holes you get from the road being damaged; chunks of concrete missing from the road.I don't see the big deal with man hole or maintenance hole. I thought they were called sewer holes or pot holes.
They usually are called manholes; that was correct. The deal is mainly about using the power of government (or, sometimes, other entities) to require ordinary people to speak a language that is prescribed for them by government.I don't see the big deal with man hole or maintenance hole. I thought they were called sewer holes or pot holes.
They changed the wording in the municipal code. They didn't outlaw words. No one besides internal government documentation is "required" to use these words. If that was the case, then they were already using the power of government to require ordinary people to use the word "manhole" before the change. The government changed the way that the government talks about things. That's it. I think it's silly and pointless, that's why I'll make jokes about it, but this oppressive angle some of you folks are trying to push isn't there.The deal is mainly about using the power of government (or, sometimes, other entities) to require ordinary people to speak a language that is prescribed for them by government.
Well, that sounds like a requirement to me , but my comments were not about any single municipality or college campus but about the situation in general.They changed the wording in the municipal code. They didn't outlaw words. No one besides internal government documentation is "required" to use these words.