More emails of Hillary are found.

[PapaZoom]

I wonder what happened to the left. During the Bush2 admin they were screaming for indictments over a self outed CIA operative.

If Hillary was a Republican she'd be in jail as we speak. She could never win let alone run for president. The press would hound her down to a shred.

 

[dgiharris]

If Hillary was a Republican she'd be in jail as we speak. She could never win let alone run for president. The press would hound her down to a shred.

I just don't see how you can say this after the WMD fiasco and Abu Grhraib.

 

[PapaZoom]

I just don't see how you can say this after the WMD fiasco and Abu Grhraib.

What has that got to do with Hillary's mishandling of classified material?

 

[tulc]

Ahh yes John Dean he was going to be the patsy for the Watergate Scandal and ended up selling his soul to stay out of jail even though he should have went, no wonder he's so far in the tank for his saviors...

https://verdict.justia.com/author/dean

Ahhh! the old "Wont try and rebut the article just attack the person writing it" or as it's called the old "ad hominem fallacy" second only to the "no true Scotsman fallacy" for popularity in CF threads.
tulc(knows it's hard to beat "oldy but a goody" fallacy!

 

[chandraclaws]

In her interview with the FBI, she tried to pin it (using a private server) on Colin Powell. That didn't work. Powell wasn't going to let that stand and is now on record exposing yet another like of Hillary. http://www.people.com/article/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-pinning-email-scandal-on-him

Colin Powell suddenly forgets a conversation he remembered
quite well back in June
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...rsation-he-remembered-quite-well-back-in-June

 

[Uncle Siggy]

attack

Reminiscing about someone's past is an attack? Especially a guy that is famous for trying to cover up criminal activity and failing miserably... (Some people will do anything for a little money... tsk...tsk...tsk...)

 

[civilwarbuff]

Sorry I couldn't help myself, really you should know better than that...

Always glad you make your day Uncle Siggy.

 

[civilwarbuff]

All she really needs with him is a new red button and a bottle of Cognac.

Thats' assuming Putin has stopped laughing from the last red button encounter.....

 

[civilwarbuff]

Exactly. That's why they want to keep the focus on Trump. If they want to discuss Trump, they should do so in a thread about Trump. This is about Hillary's emails and yet here we people who insist on discussing Trump. lol

Well, if you don't have any evidence to support hrc just change the subject.....

 

[civilwarbuff]

I think that Hillary problems could easily erode Obama's legacy and new revelations are likely to come forth before the election. I can't imagine Obama hanging in to support one hammering his legacy.

I think there is a chance it would be like the 2000 dem campaign. Gore was running and Clinton was president. To my recollection Clinton was no real help to Gore that time around

She has already come out against TPP but that was after she was for it......and help negotiate it....so if elected will she be for it again?

 

[civilwarbuff]

Let's be honest here,

Now that is a funny statement in the context of supporting hrc....

 

[civilwarbuff]

15 or 20 years ago, I would jump in my suit of armor, grab my lance and shield, get on top of my Trusty steed and join you in a magnificent charge towards the Giants that may or may not be windmills...

But I've fought and lost too many of those battles, and am now a crusty old cynic.

I am of the firm belief that the current political system/structure is doomed. But that is another rant for another time...

I have not given up quite yet......

 

[civilwarbuff]

What has that got to do with Hillary's mishandling of classified material?

Nothing, it is the progressive leftist stawman. If you got nothing nice to say about hrc through out a strawman.

 

[tulc]

Reminiscing about someone's past is an attack? Especially a guy that is famous for trying to cover up criminal activity and failing miserably... (Some people will do anything for a little money... tsk...tsk...tsk...)

Wow...so you agree and he's right on the money that if those people weren't Congressmen they would be indicted for slandering Sec. Clinton. Sweet!
tulc(is surprised but pleased to be on the same side as Uncle Siggy)

 

[LivingWordUnity]

Why did she and/or her attorneys hold back those emails? That's the big question.

 

[civilwarbuff]

Wow...so you agree and he's right on the money that if those people weren't Congressmen they would be indicted for slandering Sec. Clinton. Sweet!
tulc(is surprised but pleased to be on the same side as Uncle Siggy)

WoW!!!!!!!!!you spun that so hard I am still dizzy.

 

[PapaZoom]

Colin Powell suddenly forgets a conversation he remembered
quite well back in June
http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...rsation-he-remembered-quite-well-back-in-June

Rice said that too. Powell is simply clarifying what took place a while back. He's claiming that Hillary is saying he gave her the idea. That's not true. She'd been using it for a full year before Powell even mentioned anything about it. Also, the rules back then were different. He used two accounts. One for personal, one for classified. Hillary used her personal server for everything as the email record shows.

He confirms telling her via a memo but doesn't recall saying anything at the dinner. So what? This doesn't get Hillary off the hook. She's trying to deflect responsibility and put it on him. Typical Hillary. She's daft.

He's not saying the conversation didn't take place only that he doesn't remember it. It doesn't matter. We all forget stuff. There's no record of the conversation. So your attempt to deflect blame away from Hillary isn't going to work. She alone is responsible. She's a big girl now.

 

[PapaZoom]

She has already come out against TPP but that was after she was for it......and help negotiate it....so if elected will she be for it again?

She is definitely for it and within two years of her presidency she will flip flop on it again.

 

[tulc]

WoW!!!!!!!!!you spun that so hard I am still dizzy.

huh. Since you were very clear you weren't using his record to attack him with and you made no effort to refute anything he said in the article the only conclusion I could draw was you must agree with him.
tulc(hopes you can see where he got confused)

 

[sdowney717]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fbi-found-14000-new-hillary-clinton-emails/

How is it possible to believe this woman. She claimed over and over again that she turned over all her emails and now they've found yet 15,000 more. That's a lot of emails to sort through.

"The FBI said the 14,900 emails on disk one were either sent or received by Mrs. Clinton and are not duplicative of the approximately 30,000 emails she turned over and that the State Department already released, under a judge’s order."

Not duplicative or previous email releases. So after a judge ordered her to release all her emails, she deliberately kept back thousands. And this dishonest woman will likely be the president. She'll be able to control and hid things she doesn't want the public to see.

My guess is there are more emails to come.

Apparently?, there exists influence peddling for monetary gain by the Clintons.
Anything to make a buck?
Do they consider themselves a law unto themselves?

That and more is not really new news...