• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

modest dress code

Q

Quoth

Guest
I was raised as a "Fundie" (a term I hold with endearment and mean no offense by). I fit the definition provided in the "sticky," but most people probably wouldn't consider me a Fundie by the way I dress. At least, not if they follow the teachings of the late Falwell and/or Fred Phelps.

To me, modesty is dressing without drawing attention for the sake of selfish pride or to encourage lust. I believe this is different for each person within certain parameters.
 
Upvote 0

submisive2him

Active Member
Dec 20, 2007
67
1
✟30,177.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I do not belive any pants on a women is modest and I believe that it is not the only way to modest sometimes there is nothing like a lady wearing a nice long skirt to be modest and when pants were made they were made for men and this world has just addapted to it and i dont know about you but there is a lot of things that in this world that i will not lower my standards for
 
Upvote 0
Q

Quoth

Guest
I do not belive any pants on a women is modest and I believe that it is not the only way to modest sometimes there is nothing like a lady wearing a nice long skirt to be modest and when pants were made they were made for men and this world has just addapted to it and i dont know about you but there is a lot of things that in this world that i will not lower my standards for

It's fine if a woman does not wish to wear pants, but pants on a woman are not immodest anymore than they are immodest on a man. It is not written in Scripture that a woman is to only wear a dress, or that a man must wear a suit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WannaWitness
Upvote 0

submisive2him

Active Member
Dec 20, 2007
67
1
✟30,177.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
it is immodest because pants were made for men dresses were made for ladies and in our day people use the whole ladies wearing pants to comprimise with the world and we are not s'pose to be apart of the world we are s'pose to be seperate. There is nothing like a LADIE walking through the mall with a long dress or skirt to show that she is seperate and standing up for her christian walk with christ
 
Upvote 0
Q

Quoth

Guest
it is immodest because pants were made for men dresses were made for ladies and in our day people use the whole ladies wearing pants to comprimise with the world and we are not s'pose to be apart of the world we are s'pose to be seperate. There is nothing like a LADIE walking through the mall with a long dress or skirt to show that she is seperate and standing up for her christian walk with christ

I mean no offense, but if I see a lady in the mall with a dress or skirt, my first thought is, "Geeze, she's gotta be cold in that!" Pants are pants. They aren't a sign of the world.
 
Upvote 0

BigNorsk

Contributor
Nov 23, 2004
6,736
815
68
✟40,957.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Biblically, men wear skirts, pants are never mentioned. Women wear skirts too. Even though the clothing of men and women was very similar in many ways such as the general category of clothing (skirt, robe, etc) the people knew which belonged to which gender. There were men's skirts and women's skirts, men's robes and women's robe's and so on. Pants are not a category that is limited to men either. Chinese women were wearing pants long before any European man.

Historically tights would be men's clothing, but today, at least outside the ballet, they are generally women's especially that form known as panty hose.

Marv
 
Upvote 0

desmalia

sounds like somebody's got a case of the mondays
Sep 29, 2006
5,786
943
Canada
Visit site
✟33,712.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I was raised as a "Fundie" (a term I hold with endearment and mean no offense by). I fit the definition provided in the "sticky," but most people probably wouldn't consider me a Fundie by the way I dress. At least, not if they follow the teachings of the late Falwell and/or Fred Phelps.

To me, modesty is dressing without drawing attention for the sake of selfish pride or to encourage lust. I believe this is different for each person within certain parameters.
Very interesting, Rob. I agree with you that modesty is primarily about not drawing vain or sexual attention.

If you don't mind my asking, how do you dress and why do fundies have problems with it?

Biblically, men wear skirts, pants are never mentioned. Women wear skirts too. Even though the clothing of men and women was very similar in many ways such as the general category of clothing (skirt, robe, etc) the people knew which belonged to which gender. There were men's skirts and women's skirts, men's robes and women's robe's and so on. Pants are not a category that is limited to men either. Chinese women were wearing pants long before any European man.

Historically tights would be men's clothing, but today, at least outside the ballet, they are generally women's especially that form known as panty hose.

Marv
I agree. Honestly, I feel much more modest in a nice pair of pants (not tight or revealing, of course), than I do even in a long skirt. All skirts, regardless of length make me feel kinda.... bare. Even with nylons, I'm just not comfortable, and feel somewhat exposed. Of course I find it is vital to consider the setting I'm in as well. If I attended a church where long skirts were considered the most modest and respectful way to dress, I would dress that way simply out of respect for others' feelings on the issue.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,268
✟584,052.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
it is immodest because pants were made for men dresses were made for ladies and in our day people use the whole ladies wearing pants to comprimise with the world and we are not s'pose to be apart of the world we are s'pose to be seperate.

You may be thinking of what belongs to each gender, but this is not a matter of modesty.

Pants on women are entirely modest, although how one wears them and how they fit can be either modest or immodest, just as with skirts and dresses.
 
Upvote 0

WannaWitness

Shining God's Light for a Lost World.
Aug 31, 2004
19,072
4,888
52
✟165,003.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
First, I shall examine the "pertaining to men" issue. I notice that many women who won't wear pants because they "pertained to men first" will still wear sneakers/athletic shoes, sweatshirts, sweaters, T-shirts, and boots, all originally "men's attire". So, even though they are trying to be feminine by never wearing pants, they are still wearing some things that "pertain to men". Hey, what about denim? In the form of a skirt or pants, it was originally men's material. I mean, think about it.

As far as modesty: Pants outline the shape of both legs. On males and females. Wearing loose- or normal-fitting pants should not pose a problem. As far as that goes, I have seen many skirts that are less modest than pants. Long ones that have slits clear up the length of the leg. Those can't be too modest. Skirts that are too short, and ultra-form-fitting skirts that really emphasize the rear and hips are not modest. I say that both skirts and pants can be modest, just as there are ones that are immodest. Nobody's really going to be happy unless we all went back to wearing robes like the Bible days... and even then someone will be offended.

If a woman feels convicted to wear only skirts or dresses for whatever reason, she is to be commended for that. What I don't like is when one who has this conviction has a "holier-than-everyone-else" attitude.
 
Upvote 0

WannaWitness

Shining God's Light for a Lost World.
Aug 31, 2004
19,072
4,888
52
✟165,003.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
And for those who think wearing skirts only means "closer to God", I've got news. There are a fair number of women who are not Christians who choose to wear only dresses. It could be for any reason, but these particular choices have nothing to do with the Lord.
 
Upvote 0

WannaWitness

Shining God's Light for a Lost World.
Aug 31, 2004
19,072
4,888
52
✟165,003.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
I am so sorry I guess I am coming across the way that i want I am not trying to be " hollier than thou " please forgive me I am just trying to defend the reasoning the way I wear skirts and why I think ladies should wear dresses I apologize again

That's okay. It's just that there are a few around who actually do think that way. Not just about this issue, but other issues, as well.

Guess it's just one of those things each person thinks differently on.

Glad to have you here on CF. Sharing different thoughts is what makes this site so interesting. :)
 
Upvote 0

cubanito

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2005
2,680
222
Southeast Florida, US (Coral Gables near Miami)
✟4,071.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Before we wed, I went over to help my now wife who lived w her parents settle into a new house. I took the job of steam cleaning the carpet. Well, I was gaining weight and my work clothes were ill-fitted, and there was no AC on a midday summer Miami day, so I was most uncomfortable. Being alone in the house, I looked to see what I could find in the bags that were there that might make my chore less burdensome.

Voila, I found an ankle length tent-like dress the grandmother wore around the house. So remaining w only my underwear, I donned this wonderfully airy thin cotton dress, opened all the windows, raised all the blinds, and proceeded to give the carpet a thorough going over.

Well now, the neighbors, incl the across the street Baptist minister, found a topic of discussion for some time to come about the new arrivals to the neighborhood. So did my future wife's family, and my future wife, who only knew me for a month or so.

Now, I have NO cross-dressing fantasies. Oh, I am full of sin, but gender identity problems just aint among them. What I did was without thinking of the possible consequences. Not that I FLAUNTED it, it's just that in my socially inept (read geek, nerd, ect) makeup, the thought that someone would find it, well, odd, did not even cross my mind. I just wanted to be comfortable, and keep my work clothes clean so I could use them later.

Now who had the real sin. Me, the idiotic nerd who was simply looking at it practically, or those who turned the situation into a reason for gossip?

If a person wears something they know, or believe, is immodest or gender inapropiate, it is a sin. If they refuse to abide by the laws and conventions given by those in authority, then it is probably also a sin (exceptions occur).

Christianity has clear rules and boundaries in some matters, but what to wear is a relative matter, and one thus where sin is mostly from the attitude, rather than the cloth.

JR
 
Upvote 0

desmalia

sounds like somebody's got a case of the mondays
Sep 29, 2006
5,786
943
Canada
Visit site
✟33,712.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Female
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
That's okay. It's just that there are a few around who actually do think that way. Not just about this issue, but other issues, as well.

Guess it's just one of those things each person thinks differently on.

Glad to have you here on CF. Sharing different thoughts is what makes this site so interesting. :)
I'll second that. :)

Before we wed, I went over to help my now wife who lived w her parents settle into a new house. I took the job of steam cleaning the carpet. Well, I was gaining weight and my work clothes were ill-fitted, and there was no AC on a midday summer Miami day, so I was most uncomfortable. Being alone in the house, I looked to see what I could find in the bags that were there that might make my chore less burdensome.

Voila, I found an ankle length tent-like dress the grandmother wore around the house. So remaining w only my underwear, I donned this wonderfully airy thin cotton dress, opened all the windows, raised all the blinds, and proceeded to give the carpet a thorough going over.

Well now, the neighbors, incl the across the street Baptist minister, found a topic of discussion for some time to come about the new arrivals to the neighborhood. So did my future wife's family, and my future wife, who only knew me for a month or so.

Now, I have NO cross-dressing fantasies. Oh, I am full of sin, but gender identity problems just aint among them. What I did was without thinking of the possible consequences. Not that I FLAUNTED it, it's just that in my socially inept (read geek, nerd, ect) makeup, the thought that someone would find it, well, odd, did not even cross my mind. I just wanted to be comfortable, and keep my work clothes clean so I could use them later.

Now who had the real sin. Me, the idiotic nerd who was simply looking at it practically, or those who turned the situation into a reason for gossip?

If a person wears something they know, or believe, is immodest or gender inapropiate, it is a sin. If they refuse to abide by the laws and conventions given by those in authority, then it is probably also a sin (exceptions occur).

Christianity has clear rules and boundaries in some matters, but what to wear is a relative matter, and one thus where sin is mostly from the attitude, rather than the cloth.

JR

^^ NEVER a dull post from this man!! ^_^

I've said it before. JR, I think you and my husband would get along famously. That is sooooo exactly the kind of thing he would do. Fortunately, very little embarrasses him anymore.
 
Upvote 0