No, your intent was painfully obvious.
I don't really parse my language on here so you don't need to look for any hidden meanings. If anything I wrote doesn't seem clear, ask and I'll say it again for you....as clearly as possible.
It actually does. Harvard spells out just how and when affirmative action is used.
Harvard says Harvard isn't unfairly discriminating...well I guess that case is closed then lol. We can just remove the huge advantage some people are getting.
2019....not very good at refuting a survey months old. You're going to want the most current data available.
A lot of claims. Very little data. Unfortunately, it starts under the assumption of systemic racism and then continues on as if it's true and doesn't need any evidence.
Still, there's some research linked....a more recent name study claiming that when sending out resumes, black sounding names get 10% less calls back....
Wow. So if Jamal and Greg send out 100 resumes each....Greg gets calls from 10, Jamal gets calls from 9. Who gets hired? Well...don't worry about that....we spoke with HR and about half the time they won't even bother with Greg unless Jamal already turned them down and there's no other minority groups on the callback list.
Let's get this straight....I have a blanket survey of people who hire employees for companies....
1 in 6 admitted to being told to discriminate against white men.
Half admitted to actually doing it.
And you think that thr bigger problem is that Jamal gets called for an interview an average of 9 times for every 10 times Greg gets called?
Who cares about calls for interviews when they openly admit they aren't hiring Greg?
https://nationalfund.org/racial-bias-in-hiring-practices-widens-the-black-white-wealth-disparity/
This is by far my favorite because it so elegantly breaks down all the racist reasoning behind this gross narrative.
They assume everyone is as racist as they are, so of course, the reason so many white men find employment is because the racist white men at the top of those businesses only want white men.
So the solution they want....racial discrimination against white men and hiring quotas...will work because once we force them to hire some women and black men....those women and black men will also be racists who discriminate in favor of women and black men. What a disgusting view of the world.
Anyway, they've successfully gotten companies to discriminate against white men (as my survey shows) and they have more black men and women in positions of power. Why isn't it working then? Why aren't they putting new black men and women on the fast track of success? Why do they hire white men?
The answer is pretty simple....if you got hired for being a woman or black man....then your job security depends on you being the only woman or black man at the company. You didn't get hired on merit or outcompeting anyone...you got hired to check a diversity box. If you hire or promote more black men and women, the company might realize they don't need you anymore. So they hire white men. Darn racism.
This is the tiny bit if data I already referenced above. The second link contains a link to this page.
https://www.marketplace.org/2021/08...ng-is-still-happening-at-the-earliest-stages/
Finally....guess what? If you know a white guy that you're friends with? He can get you a job. Unfortunately if you're one of the many openly racist people who shamelessly spout your racist beliefs about white men....that job referral probably isn't coming. Too bad so sad.
Do you think it's odd at all that I'm able to pull examples of people openly admitting to bias and discrimination against white men but you have to try to find reasons to assume it exists against anyone else?
Why do you think that is?