• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Missing Energy in Creation: A New Theory

Status
Not open for further replies.

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The massive amount of energy necessary for creation is missing from the record and most theories. Gravity was not sufficient. Here is another theory. I am not advocating, except for the backhanded swipe at the nebular hypothesis.

Plasma works for me -- all I want is a model. Alleged proof is for morons. We are just talking about models.

"You rattle my brain ...."

YouTube - Jerry Lee Lewis - Great Balls Of Fire

Did great balls of fire form the planets? - space - 20 July 2009 - New Scientist

Did great balls of fire form the planets?


ASTEROID-SIZED balls of magma hurtled through our infant solar system, and spray from their many collisions provided much of the raw material that formed Earth and its rocky siblings. That's according to a new take on an old theory that challenges the notion that the solar system started out as a placid sea of dust motes which simply clumped together to form planets.
The early family tree of our solar system's rocky planets features tiny glassy spheres called chondrules, found today inside ancient meteorites. The origins of chondrules, which are typically about a millimetre across, are shrouded in mystery. They make up much of the material preserved in meteorites that were formed about 2 million years after the solar system began and are thought to have clumped together to form asteroid-size planetesimals, which in turn agglomerated to make Earth and its peers.
Chondrules' glassy composition and spheroidal shape show that they were once molten. According to the popular view, they formed when dust grains in the nebula surrounding the infant sun were suddenly heated, perhaps when cosmic lightning or shock waves shot through the nebula.
But calculations published in 2008 on the retention of sodium by the chondrules suggest they formed in dense swarms (Science, vol 320, p 1617). This is difficult to reconcile with the melting of dust motes in a nebula, which are expected to be widely spaced.
Now, Ian Sanders of Trinity College Dublin in Ireland says another formation scenario, involving collisions between asteroid-sized balls of magma - kept molten through their high radioactivity - offers a better explanation. Sanders renewed the case for the idea, first proposed in the 1980s, at this week's meeting of the Meteoritical Society in Nancy, France.
Decay of radioactive isotopes today helps to keep the cores of relatively large bodies like Earth molten. Sanders argues that the greater abundance of radioactive material in the fledgling solar system means that if objects larger than 30 kilometres across formed, they would have melted through.
Collisions between such magma balls would breach their thin crusts of solid rock, spraying molten material into space, where the droplets would quickly cool to form chondrules.
Collisions between magma balls would breach their thin crusts and spray material into space



"It puts a completely different slant on what happened in the early solar system in the first 2 million years," Sanders says. That is the period when chondrules formed, based on measurements of key isotopes within them.
Conel Alexander of the Carnegie Institution of Washington DC, who led last year's Science study, says the high density of droplets possible in plumes ejected from magma balls could explain his team's results, but finds the idea hard to accept on other grounds. A key issue is that material within magma balls should have quickly sorted into chemically distinct layers, with iron sinking to the core and lighter elements near the surface. The chemical signature of such sorting is not present in chondrules, Alexander says.
Sanders notes that some of the chondrules are indeed depleted in iron, as might be expected if they splashed from near the surface of a layered liquid body, though such chondrules are in a minority.

Free associating:

YouTube - Monty Python Communist Quiz sketch

Great balls of fire.
 

philadiddle

Drumming circles around you
Dec 23, 2004
3,719
56
44
Canada
Visit site
✟4,522.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Could you explain what point you are trying to make? I don't mean that question in a rude or rhetorical way. As I read your post you say that there is new evidence for a model that explains the formation of our solar system, but then you say you don't endorse it, so what are you getting at?
 
Upvote 0

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Could you explain what point you are trying to make? I don't mean that question in a rude or rhetorical way. As I read your post you say that there is new evidence for a model that explains the formation of our solar system, but then you say you don't endorse it, so what are you getting at?

The article finds that gravity can't explain the accretion of planetary bodies. It posits a highly energized form of matter - hot, radioactive matter -- as the building block of the planetary bodies. The extra energy necessary to make the planets had to occur in some form or another -- that's my thesis, or even speculation if you like. But, this particular theory agrees that there was a lot more energy involved, it just wouldnt agree with, say, energy in the form of electromagnetism energizing plasma.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.