Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just like you would like me to prove that Peter was in Rome as the first Pope??Other Church fathers also attest to Polycarp's discipleship under John. Polycarp was Bishop of Smyrna. This is well known. If you have evidence to the contrary then post it.
Yet no mention of Polycarp in Ephesus, or John in Smyrna ...Question... why didn't John in his revelation letter, name Polycarp, the bishop of Smyrna, directly..? Why didn't John name a successor to the position of bishop of Ephesians when he left? John knew that his letter was going to reach the seven churches.. It wouldn't have been hard to say... Hey buddy.... Yeshua told me a message that is for your congregation there in Ephesus and then again to his other buddy Polycarp in Smyrna...after all they were leaders of the congregation.Ephesus and Smyrna are VERY close to each other.
http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/625/586/62558604_640.jpg
John and Polycarp WERE in the SAME area at the same time. Probably at least 10 years before John died.
no evidence he ever was in Rome. Paul's journey to the city is recorded in great detail (Acts 27 and 28). There is in fact no New Testament evidence, nor any historical proof of any kind, that Peter ever was in Rome. All rests on legend.Peter actually established the patriarchate of Antioch before he ever set foot in Rome :-0
or how aboutRev 14:8 Another angel, a second, followed, saying, Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great, she who made all nations drink the wine of her impure passion
or how aboutRev 16:19 The great city was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell, and God remembered great Babylon, to make her drain the cup of the fury of his wrath
it doesn't matter which verse you pick, it does not bode well for BabylonRev 17:5 And on her forehead was written a name of mystery: Babylon the great, mother of harlots and of earth's abominations
so I ask you again, is this the type of place you can picture Peter being the Pope overRev 18:2 And he called out with a mighty voice,Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great
Where is the evidence or the influence of Peter's authority over this congregation in RomeRev 18:10 They will stand far off, in fear of her torment, and say, Alas! alas! thou great city, thou mighty city, Babylon! In one hour has thy judgment come
For if you claim that Peter is writing from Rome, which he called Babylon, then you would have to accept that it is the common terminology that John uses also in Revelation. Then ask yourself, why would Peter want to be the Pope of that? If you do not accept this, then why are you accepting any other story coming from Rome regarding the "Church Fathers"?Rev 18:21 So shall Babylon the great city be thrown down with violence.
no evidence he ever was in Rome. Pauls journey to the city is recorded in great detail (Acts 27 and 28). There is in fact no New Testament evidence, nor any historical proof of any kind, that Peter ever was in Rome. All rests on legend.
But if you insist.. then let's go with that thought.. There is, in the greeting at the end of his first epistle: The Church here in Babylon, united with you by Gods election, sends you her greeting, and so does my son, Mark (1 Pet. 5:13, Knox).
Is Babylon a code-word for Rome? Let us then consider the other New Testament citations:
or how about or how about it doesn't matter which verse you pick, it does not bode well for Babylon so I ask you again, is this the type of place you can picture Peter being the Pope over Where is the evidence or the influence of Peter's authority over this congregation in Rome For if you claim that Peter is writing from Rome, which he called Babylon, then you would have to accept that it is the common terminology that John uses also in Revelation. Then ask yourself, why would Peter want to be the Pope of that? If you do not accept this, then why are you accepting any other story coming from Rome regarding the "Church Fathers"?
By the way, the story of John boiling in oil is suppose to come from Polycarp.
You brought Peter into the conversation...I think you are confused. These are not western church Fathers, although they claim them too since the church was not separated yet, although doctrine was always different. All 7 churches were EASTERN churches. If Peter was or was not the first Bishop of the patriarch in Rome is of no consequence here.
Just like you would like me to prove that Peter was in Rome as the first Pope??
A convert would not be messianic unless they continued to keep the Torah and observe the feasts of YHWH.
Looking up the three names led me to this page:
I do not want to derail or necro post to an older post.:o
Just sharing... if I may
"observe the feasts of YHWH"
In my area, there are many churches, that is a good thing.
But as I see signs outside some of them yesterday Friday 4 Oct, fall festivals signs that have a smiling large pig on them, that have counter halloween gatherings, that they call fall festival, my guts twist within me.
If the non-Messianic, non-feast observing churches that would find it a horror to do so, has a gathering / congregation of saved gospel believers, that observes valentines day, counter halloween time, easter, christmas
that can not be found in the Word, if they would search history accurately, why is it such a sin to them to honor the prepetual Feast days? It surley must be better than fall festival as an example.
I am in a city, none of these members are farmers.
Sorry back to your Excellent Messianic History thread.
I just needed to vent. Please bear with me.
Hope I still have few punches on my new guy card left.
Ex Rabbi Zolli was not rejected by his fellow Jews because he converted to Roman Catholicism. He was not reinstated to his former position after the war because of his lack of leadership during the occupation. Without malice, just want to add, if you want to claim a Jew who converted to Catholicism as part of MJ history, you will never be taken seriously.Rabbi Israel Zolli (1881-1956) was the former Chief Rabbi of Rome who helped save about 4,000 Roman Jews as the Nazis entered Rome in 1943. Posing as a structural engineer, he entered the Vatican and asked Pope Pius XII to protect Romes Jews. The pope acquiesced and agreed to make churches, monasteries, convents, and the Vatican itself sanctuaries for them. Prior to his coming to Rome, Zolli served for 35 years as the Chief Rabbi of Trieste.
Following the war, Rav Zolli made a public confession of faith in 1945 and was forced out of his position. When asked if he therefore believed that the Messiah had come, he said:
Yes, positively. I have believed it many years. And now I am so firmly convinced of the truth of it that I can face the whole world and defend my faith with the certainty and solidity of the mountains.
Jewish leaders called him a heretic, excommunicated him, proclaimed a fast for several days in atonement for his treason, and mourned him as one dead.
True..... I agree.Ex Rabbi Zolli was not rejected by his fellow Jews because he converted to Roman Catholicism. He was not reinstated to his former position after the war because of his lack of leadership during the occupation. Without malice, just want to add, if you want to claim a Jew who converted to Catholicism as part of MJ history, you will never be taken seriously.
True..... I agree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?