That is a lie (perhaps excusable given the lateness), Michael.
Ya know...
I've been around the internet, debating various topic for more than 10 years now. In all that time I've never met a single individual in cyberspace who debates any topic (probably every topic) in a less ethical fashion than you do, and more irrationally than you do.
Every single one of your posts includes personal attacks, personal insults, and personal nonsense. You refuse to even educate yourself to the topic of MHD theory by actually *reading* a textbook on the topic. You therefore know *nothing* about plasma physics, yet you feel emotionally driven to debate a scientific topic that you simply do not understand. You've never read Cosmic Plasma the book that is akin to the 'Bible' of EU/PC theory, nor any other textbook on the topic of MHD theory, so you have no idea what EU/PC theory is even about.
Most atheists that debate Christians take the time to educate themselves. They typically have at least *read* the Bible for themselves. Based on my experience, they often know more about the actual content of the Bible than most 'Christians' in fact. They don't typically try to argue from a place of blind ignorance of the topic of "Christianity" as you're doing with MHD theory and EU/PC theory. Your behaviors aren't even *rational*, let alone ethical.
I asked for you to back up your assertions about the BICEP2 paper with your physical and mathematical analysis of the BICEP2 paper
Who do you think you are? I'm not obligated to bark math at your command. I see no evidence you would even begin to understand any maths related to MHD theory if I did provide it since you refuse to educate yourself on the topic of MHD theory or circuit theory as it applies to plasma physics. Talk about throwing pearls before swine! What possible good would it do to hand you math you couldn't possibly understand in the first place?
I did something *better*. I handed you the *expert* opinions of people who are actually more knowledgeable than I am on this topic. They blow your claim up big time and show the problems with trying to use WMAP to 'scrub' the Bicep2 data. You won't deal with their work anymore than you will deal with the fact you *need* plasma to get "magnetic reconnection". You wont deal with the fact that Dungey is your superior in solar physics and blows your claims about electrical discharges in plasma out of the water. You refuse to provide any reference that is external to yourself to support any of your erroneous claims.
You gave no reference to a paper that analyzed (physical or mathematically
) any results of the BICEP2 paper.
Pure denial. Unless Bicep2 data has nothing whatseover to do with WMAP data sets, you have a *serious* problem on your hands.
Poor baby, you can't handle that fact either, so you went right back to your attack the messenger trick. You're pathetically ignorant of this topic, and therefore pathetically predictable when it comes to your sleazy debate tactics.
You obviously never read the paper because those experts never even mention Section 9 of the BICEP2 paper or any problems with it.
You obviously didn't spend any time trying to understand the implication of their work nor to understand how it applies to that *ridiculous* section 9 of your lambda-fiasco paper.
They do cite the BICEP 2 paper in the conclusion of the preprint - no analysis of sections 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3 or any other part of the BICEP2 paper.
They assume most readers can think for themselves RC. The fact you can't or won't is irrelevant to the problems they point out.
You are lying about the experts...
You're obviously projecting again. You failed to tell the truth about Dungey and his use of the term "electrical discharges" in solar flares, none of which required a breakdown of a dielectric. You didn't tell the truth again when you said it was impossible for electrical discharges to occur in plasma and you fibbed again when you insisted that a breakdown of a dielectric is a requirement of an "actual" discharge in plasma. Nobody but you believes that is true, which is why you are incapable of providing an *external* reference to support your false statements on that topic.
You misrepresented the facts yet again when you claimed plasma was optional in the 'magnetic reconnection' process. Wiki falsifies your claim in the very first paragraph. Somov's example included diagrams and included current (plasma) in his example. Tom Bridgman even falsified your false statements too.
There is simply no point in discussing scientific topics with you RC. You won't learn. You won't read the materials or respond to them in a logical or rational fashion. Whatever you don't wish to deal with, you simply ignore, and you go right back to your pathetic personal attacks. You can't argue the scientific aspects because you don't understand them in the first place.
Why are you here stalking me RC? What's your emotional attachment to me personally all about? Why not go play over at JREF with the rest of your clueless buddies? Why come here and display your own personal ignorance of these topics for all world to see? You're behaviors are not only illogical and irrational and based on denial, the stalking aspect is down right creepy.
Do you believe everything you hear without checking it out for yourself? Have you read Cosmic Plasma, or even read a half dozen of Alfven's papers for yourself yet? Have you read that paper on galaxy formation theory by Peratt yet? Have you read any of Bruce's work? Birkeland?
