X is at a point half way between the currents, Michael.
Yes, and it's *a* (not the only) point where the magnetic field topology has been altered by the movement of the plasma currents. Contrary to your oversimplified assertions, magnetic "fields" form as a whole continuum, not in tiny little individualized lines. The whole fields *move* with the particles RC. The fields *merge* as two full continuum, not in one little x point in the middle.
The "rate" of reconnection is related to the *acceleration/movement* of charged particles. No particles, no *reconnection*. Your "toy" understanding of the process called "magnetic reconnection" isn't "real" RC, and Priest explained why your toy isn't real too.
Notice how he talked about "enclosing both currents"? You missed the whole enclosure part, along with the currents, and the movement of those currents. Epic oversimplification on your part RC.Michael: No X point = no magnetic reconnection. "Two field lines approach the X-point, merge there, forming a separatrix, and then they reconnect forming a field line which encloses both currents."
And the key ingredient and inconvenient fact that you left out is that Dungey included a huge electrical current running down the middle of that "neutral" point, whereas Clinger has nothing but his empty "vacuum"! Get a grip! Dungey explains where the kinetic energy and electrical energy comes from (plasma), whereas you have nothing but a vacuum!Dungey used "neutral" point for X and marked it with an N:
The Neutral Point Discharge Theory of Solar Flares. a Reply to Cowling's Criticism
Figure 3 is basically Somov's figure but of course for magnetic reconnection in plasma.
You can't actually learn MHD theory via osmosis as you seem to presume. You actually have to 'study' it RC. When are you going to visit an actual library?
Upvote
0