lionroar0 said:
Matthew 23:9 niv
"And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven."
And, that was such an easy command to follow......
All I see is an interpretation of Scripture that contradits Scriptures. Paul says that he was like a father, Jesus calls abraham father and St. Stephen call the Jewish elders fathers before they stoned him.
This last part is nothing but straw.
peace
There is a big difference between referring to a person who is a father, as a father... and calling someone "Father." We can call a pig, a pig. But we are not to call a person a pig. Same principle.
Paul was a spiritual father to some. But, he was not to be called "father." Abraham was called "father" just like we have "founding fathers." Its a term used to not mean "father" in the sense Jesus spoke of. And, when Stephen spoke, it was in reference to younger and older men. It was not in the same context as found in Jesus command. Jesus words were spoken in regards to spiritual leaders.... No one who was involved with our spiritual relationship to God was to be referred to as, "Father."
Matthew 23:8-10 niv
"But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have only one Master and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven. Nor are you to be called 'teacher,' for you have one Teacher, the Christ."
Rabbi was a spiritual leader. Teacher, ditto. And, some were in the habit of using the term "Father" in reference to someone in such particular positions. You make it sound like Jesus had no meaning behind what he said. It was just said to fill space on a page. Yet, the catholic church calls their pastors "Father." I guess Jesus was talking about nothing?
The key word was found in verse 11....
"The greatest among you will be your servant."
One can not be a servant of another if he is being his father to him. It would be like a household servant who has authority over a child to watch over him, demanding that the child call him father. The child's father would not like it if he heard him saying that to his child.
OK, then. Where does it apply? When Jesus said call no man father? How is that passage to be applied to our Christian walk? You have tried to make it walk in reverse and disappear from holding any meaning for us.
And, priests? That went out with the nation of Israel. We are now all priests in Christ. A priest represents himself to God. We now have direct access to our Father through the blood of Christ. And, an ambassador represents God to other men. We are all called to be both.
1 Peter 2:5 niv
"you also, like living stones, are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ."
We are all priests before God. There is no assigned specialty priesthood in the church's hierarcy. It was only found under the Mosiac law for the Jews. We name our sins to God. We no longer go to a priest to name our sins so he can offer a sacrifice for those sins. Jesus paid for all our sins. There are no more sacrifices to be offered. There is no need for a speciality priesthood.
1 Peter 2:9 niv
"But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light."
And, we are all called to a higher priesthood than the Jews knew of. For we are
all called a
"royal priesthood."
The Catholic church has obviously created its own system outside of the system designated in the Bible. No wonder that for years the Catholic church did not want the people to get their hands on a Bible they could read and understand for themselves.
Revelation 1:6 niv
"To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his blood, and has made us to be a kingdom and priests to serve his God and Fatherto him be glory and power for ever and ever! Amen."
In Christ, GeneZ