prodromos said:Icons are not idols, nor are they graven images. I think it is best not to leave words out when quoting scripture, don't you?
John
what is a graven image?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
prodromos said:Icons are not idols, nor are they graven images. I think it is best not to leave words out when quoting scripture, don't you?
John
Indeed, His human flesh and soul are created. This is the mystery of the incarnation, that the uncreated would become one with His creation, and a fallen and corrupt creation at that. It is not surprising that people have such a hard time grasping this, as it is something which never happened before in the history of creation, nor will it ever happen again. The incarnation is totally unique and beyond anything which our feeble minds have ever dealt with.genez said:Ahhhem.... If Mary was the mother of God? Then Jesus was created.![]()
Something that is sculpted, hewn, carved or engraved.Jerrysch said:what is a graven image?
prodromos said:Something that is sculpted, hewn, carved or engraved.
prodromos said:Icons are not idols, nor are they graven images. I think it is best not to leave words out when quoting scripture, don't you?
John
Well, I guess they would, but the context of God's command not to make graven images was that no one had seen God, so they could not ever make a true image of God. Since the incarnation we have seen God, so it is now permissable to make true images of God. Remember also that the Cherubim on top of the ark were graven images and God commanded the Jews to make them, so it seems some are acceptable and some aren't. The prohibition is not a blanket condemnation of all images, just false ones.Jerrysch said:would statues fall into the category of graven?
Oblio said:Really, where in Scripture is this stated ?
prodromos said:Well, I guess they would, but the context of God's command not to make graven images was that no one had seen God, so they could not ever make a true image of God. Since the incarnation we have seen God, so it is now permissable to make true images of God. Remember also that the Cherubim on top of the ark were graven images and God commanded the Jews to make them, so it seems some are acceptable and some aren't. The prohibition is not a blanket condemnation of all images, just false ones.
John.
There is no permission to add to the traditions that the apostles had already taught,
The evangelist Saint Luke had painted several icons of Mary with the Christ child long before the Gospels and Letters were ever gathered together in what we now call the New Testament. At least three of those icons survive today.deu58 said:Where is that found in scripture that we can now make graven images??????
Exodus 20:4 said:Thou shalt not make to thyself an idol, nor likeness of anything, whatever things are in the heaven above, and whatever are in the earth beneath, and whatever are in the waters under the earth
Jerrysch said:I think it is more serious than this...the RC group encourages their membership to bow down and kneel before stone images!
What about the bronze serpent that God commanded Moses to create and commanded the Isrealites that were bitten by snakes to look on it to be cured. I guess God was commanding the Isrealites to worship the figure of a bronze serpent. So that means that God was commanding them to do something that He commanded them not to do, which means that God must either be confused or capable of contradicting Himself.Oblio said:God is speaking of idols, things graven that are idols. If He were speaking simply of any sculpted or graven thing then He would be contradicting Himself when later He commanded the Israelites to create graven Cherubim. You would also be in violation for any pictures, paintings, and photographs that you posses or create.
prodromos said:The evangelist Saint Luke had painted several icons of Mary with the Christ child long before the Gospels and Letters were ever gathered together in what we now call the New Testament. At least three of those icons survive today.
John.
Axion said:Hmmm.
Having lost the argument with respect to mary being Mother of God, and their attempt to divide Jesus into two peole, I see that the anti-catholics have again changed the subject and moved on to the old "graven image" argument.
Of course the origin of the idea that ieved "graven image" meant any image, and not just idols of false gods, was Islam.
Neither do you. You have yet to make a compelling, Scripture-in-toto arguement. You have cited various random verses, but nothing cogent or irrefutable.deu58 said:Lost????? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You have never had an argument in the first place, You have no scriptural support, No scripture, No arguement,
yours in Christ
deu 58
Oblio said:God is speaking of idols, things graven that are idols. If He were speaking simply of any sculpted or graven thing then He would be contradicting Himself when later He commanded the Israelites to create graven Cherubim. You would also be in violation for any pictures, paintings, and photographs that you posses or create.