• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Mary and the Scriptures

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
And yet if Christ is our adoptive Brother, then His mother is our adoptive mother. It's therefore theologically acceptable to refer to Mary using maternal language. One doesn't have to obviously, but it's birthed out of explicitly biblical teaching. There is no harm in referring to she who gave birth to our Savior and God with loving and affectionate language. All human beings are worthy of being addressed and spoken of lovingly and affectionately, so it seems logical to me that at the very least the same could be said of the Blessed Virgin mother of our Lord.

-CryptoLutheran

Believe Paul refers to the Jerusalem above as our mother. You think that's Mary?
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,503
28,985
Pacific Northwest
✟811,316.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Believe Paul refers to the Jerusalem above as our mother. You think that's Mary?

Depends, the woman who gave birth to me a little over 30 years ago is with the Lord in heaven, do I think she also is the Jerusalem above?

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Depends, the woman who gave birth to me a little over 30 years ago is with the Lord in heaven, do I think she also is the Jerusalem above?

-CryptoLutheran

Probably not. Paul is contrasting the two covenants, the one earthly, the other spiritual. We're children of promise.
 
Upvote 0
M

MamaZ

Guest
And yet if Christ is our adoptive Brother, then His mother is our adoptive mother. It's therefore theologically acceptable to refer to Mary using maternal language. One doesn't have to obviously, but it's birthed out of explicitly biblical teaching. There is no harm in referring to she who gave birth to our Savior and God with loving and affectionate language. All human beings are worthy of being addressed and spoken of lovingly and affectionately, so it seems logical to me that at the very least the same could be said of the Blessed Virgin mother of our Lord.

-CryptoLutheran
Well actually it is a Spiritual birth and not one of the Flesh. So therefore since Mary has noting to do with my Spiritual birth there is no adoptive mother in the Spirit. For in the Spirit we have three. Father , Son , Holy Spirit. All Being God. We are to know no man according to the flesh. Mary is actually a sister in the Lord. For she too was saved by Grace through the new birth of the Spirit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aslansbud
Upvote 0

SolomonVII

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2003
23,138
4,919
Vancouver
✟162,516.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Depends, the woman who gave birth to me a little over 30 years ago is with the Lord in heaven, do I think she also is the Jerusalem above?

-CryptoLutheran

Do you consider your mother in heaven who gave birth to you and called you personally by name, is your heavenly intermediary?

As Mary is for Catholics at least?
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
It had never ocurred to me before, but it is apparently, in one sense, no more than an extension of the community of saints, whereby we were instructed to pray for each other; and who could have more influence with her son, than Mary the mother of God. This is where I read it:

Why pray to anyone but Jesus? - Catholic Answers Forums
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
Well actually it is a Spiritual birth and not one of the Flesh. So therefore since Mary has noting to do with my Spiritual birth there is no adoptive mother in the Spirit. For in the Spirit we have three. Father , Son , Holy Spirit. All Being God. We are to know no man according to the flesh. Mary is actually a sister in the Lord. For she too was saved by Grace through the new birth of the Spirit.

No. It was also a birth in the flesh, making Jesus, true Man as well as true God. That was pivotal to our redemption.
 
Upvote 0

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,800
1,310
✟475,040.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We are not born into the family of God through the flesh. We are born of the Spirit into the family of God where we cry Abba.
Which is only possible because Jesus was born into the human family through the flesh.
 
Upvote 0

paul becke

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 12, 2003
4,012
814
84
Edinburgh, Scotland.
✟227,714.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Politics
UK-Labour
That still does not make His mother of the Flesh our mother of the Spirit. We have no heavenly mother.

Why not? Jesus became man, so that we might become part of his spiritual family in heaven; an extended family, into which we become his adopted brotehrs and sisters. 'Know ye not that ye are gods?' And we know that there is only one God.

Do you think that now that their life on earth is past, Jesus would discard the reverent loving relationship he would have had with his mother in their earthly existence? God is not less human than us; he is more human - in the best sense of that word.
 
Upvote 0
M

MamaZ

Guest
]Why not? Jesus became man, so that we might become part of his spiritual family in heaven; an extended family, into which we become his adopted brotehrs and sisters. 'Know ye not that ye are gods?' And we know that there is only one God.

Jesus became man to be tempted as we are and to die a brutal death for us. For while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. We are part of His Spiritual family due to the rebirthing of the Spirit. Ony available because of the shed blood and ressurection of Jesus.


Do you think that now that their life on earth is past, Jesus would discard the reverent loving relationship he would have had with his mother in their earthly existence? God is not less human than us; he is more human - in the best sense of that word.
[/QUOTE]



Do you not know that we are to know no man according to the flesh? Just as scripture teaches us. God is not Human actually. The Son became flesh. Not the Father. As far as the family extending into Heaven as mother, son, daughter, and husband NO. For we will all be brothers and sisters in the eternal family. Due to the new birth of the Spirit. This is why we are told to know no man according to the flesh.
 
Upvote 0

pshun2404

Newbie
Jan 26, 2012
6,027
620
✟86,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I know I am a memebr to the one holy, catholic, and apostolic church, but do not adhere to Roman Catholicism predominately for the following reason.

When I first became called by God, I once was visiting Roman Catholic churches regularly, and joyfully participating in their services. There was a Bishop who was there celebrating the Mass (which I out of respect for their tradition willfully did not partake in). He denied the laity the blood of Christ. This was disturbing enough.

After the Mass, when we were alll gathered downstairs, he approached me and said I noticed you did not partake of the Eucharist are you not Catholic? And I told him, on the contrary I was, but not Roman Catholic. I asked "If I were serious and wanted to become a Roman Catholic what must I do" and he said "you must swear your aliegence to and become devoted to the Blessed Mother" (whom I respect greatly as being chosen among all women to be the mother of my Lord) and I turned and grasped his hand gently and said I can only swear alleigence to and stay devoted to the one she swore alleigence to and was devoted to...the Lord Jesus and no one else. He shuttered and said as he immediately pulled his hand away, "Then you cannot be Roman Catholic for this is the first requirement."

And since then I have never sought to even consider such a heresy ever again. Now perhaps he was the exception (I certainly hope so) for I have found and enjoy listenig to Father Ed McDonough and Thom Dilorenzo and other Christ centered, word centered Catholic teachers, but if Christ (who Mary always obeyed unto this day) is not the focus, then how can it be said to be the true way? I am sure that my holy Mary, mother of God, is appalled by this human exaltation. As she said in Cana...do as He says. Get it? Focus on Christ...there is no other mediator. Not do as I say but do as he says...

In Him we can come boldly before the throne of grace to obtain mercy in time of need. Now yes we can call on other saints to pray with and for us, we are one in Him (the communion of saints), and they can call on us, but we cannot pray to one another (not to Mary, or to Saint Jude, or to any one else). Only God has the power and authority to answer prayer.

Mary confessed just as I do, of her need for the savior...Now I love her, and she is a great model, but just a woman none the less. As far as personal holiness any of us would pale in comparison to Mary, but in really being Holy it is all of Him setting us apart and making us His own (which included her) to be uniquely used for His purpose for that is what it means to be Holy. Just my $.02...the Lord bless you and keep you...please reply if you feel so moved.

Paul
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

James4_14

Veteran
Sep 26, 2011
2,205
43
✟2,826.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
***Luke 1:80 And the child (John) grew, and waxed strong in spirit, and was in the deserts till the day of his shewing unto Israel.
***Luke 2:40 And the child (Jesus) grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him.
An intentional parallel here. Mary did not teach Jesus. It was God Himself!

***Luke 2:49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?
He knew at a very early age what His mission was!
Mary did not have this wisdom:
***John 7:46 The officers answered, Never man spake like this man.

***Luke 1:38 And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her.

She was not His teacher
 
Upvote 0

KNOWLEDGE BOMB

Junior Member
Jun 6, 2013
514
22
The suncoast
✟818.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
"advanced in wisdom and age and favor before God and man." Luke 2:52

in other words, Jesus learned. And Mary taught Him (they homeschooled in those days).

KNOWLEDGE BOMB replies:

Jesus was full of wisdom but not by marys teachings - this is Godly wisdom and it wasn't taught to him through Mary.... I don't know about home schooled but a women wouldn't be teaching Jesus anything to do with Gods kingdom...
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,503
28,985
Pacific Northwest
✟811,316.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Mariaphobia is perhaps the oddest of all fears.

Heaven forbid that we affirm the Incarnation and the doctrine of our salvation through He who became man for our sake.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0