Benedicta00
Well-Known Member
and I have been sealed too- now why is what you believe right and what i believe wrong?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
and I have been sealed too- now why is what you believe right and what i believe wrong?The Holy Spirit is our seal.. The Holy Spirit,God the Father and Christ are all one are they not? The Godhead... Therefore when the Holy Spirit dwells in us is He not sent from our Father? Because we believe in the Son and what He has done for us? Christ in us the hope of Glory?
Christ's very Church on earth.
Now prove me wrong objectively?
Okay and this says what.. That I am to run to the Catholic Church? I have a Pastor that shepherds His flock I go to. If He started to preach contrary to the word of God would I stick around.. Heck no.. I would run as fast as my little feet would allow me to.. Back to a place that preaches and teaches scripture alone..
I DID NOT! WOULD YOU GET OFF MY CASE?? I AM SICK OF YOU HARRASSING ME and if it doesn't stop..you will be reported..is that clear?
I think it was IAA.Yes you did...or someone did. You requoted me, so I assumed it was you.
Why? Because I said I disagree with your bad theology? HOw is that harrassment? You have done nothing ut disagree with Legend..is that harrassment to?
I didn't change what i said, I just tried to rephrase it becuase it was way misunderstood.When I quoted you, you said that you believe (RCC) that the HS was given to one person at a time, and that's the Popes..did you not? After I quoted you, I saw that you changed what you said, or tried to change it in other posts.
I would run to if they taught contradictary to Scripture..
But the point is you claim that there is no orginization in the Church, and we shouldn't obey people who lead us in it.
Does one have to right to defend what the bible is saying? Without adding or taking away from it? Does one not have the right to question what is being said that does not line up with the scriptures? If one goes around and says that they belong to the only one true church and then brings us things that cannot be clearly seen in scripture do we not have the right quote the scripture in the context of what it is written for.. Not taking only one scripture and making a whole new concept of it.. Now I asked a question. Where do you see in the scriptures where Jesus preached about His mother or any of the Apostles preached about Mary? How did Mary get to be where she is seen today in the Rcc? How does one scripture where Mary magnifies God for blessing her get turned around to where she is thought of as she is today? Jesus taught us about How we have to go through Him to get to the Father.. The Apostles also taught the same.. Where does Mary come into this? I don't see Jesus preach her and I don't see any of the Apostles preach her.. They all preach Christ and Him crucified. Nothing about Mary..So you do acknowledge that no one here as no more authority to pick up a bible and tell the other one they are the one who is in error?
But all we need to know and hear and see He did write..If by CC you mean Roman Catholic, I can agree.
But how do you know what he said? It's not that he spoke differently then what he wrote, it's thathe said things he didn't write..
The object proof is history itself that dates back from 33 AD all the way to now. Christs' Church was, is and aways will be Catholic in belief, in practice and in worship. period, CJ.Fine...
Now prove to me objectively that such is the Catholic Church. Not with self-claims and self-serving interpretations of self, but with the same criteria you demand from Protestants - objectively.
Otherwise, IMHO, you are simply doing the very thing you are rebuking my full unseparated equal sister in Christ for doing. Old proverb: "What's good for the goose is good for the gander." Might be true the other way around, too?
Thank you.
Pax!
- Josiah
but you only defending your interpretation of it.Does one have to right to defend what the bible is saying? Without adding or taking away from it? Does one not have the right to question what is being said that does not line up with the scriptures? If one goes around and says that they belong to the only one true church and then brings us things that cannot be clearly seen in scripture do we not have the right quote the scripture in the context of what it is written for.. Not taking only one scripture and making a whole new concept of it.. Now I asked a question. Where do you see in the scriptures where Jesus preached about His mother or any of the Apostles preached about Mary? How did Mary get to be where she is seen today in the Rcc? How does one scripture where Mary magnifies God for blessing her get turned around to where she is thought of as she is today? Jesus taught us about How we have to go through Him to get to the Father.. The Apostles also taught the same.. Where does Mary come into this? I don't see Jesus preach her and I don't see any of the Apostles preach her.. They all preach Christ and Him crucified. Nothing about Mary..
so then here is the question. How does Mary get the titles that you give her today?but you only defending your interpretation of it.
Can you prove to me how your interpretation is not subjective but objective?
and we donlt claim half of what you posted here.
I wipe my feet of this thread. I am sorry, but this very kind of nonsense is why I will NOT be catholic or have any thing more to do with it. Bene, I have enjoyed our conversations. God bless you sweetie ok? I am sorry, but I can't be a part of this kind of stuff anymore.
The object proof is history itself that dates back from 33 AD all the way to now. Christs' Church was, is and aways will be Catholic in belief, in practice and in worship. period, CJ.
You of course are under no compulsion to agree with this.
becuase the bible does not tell us we are forbidden to have a devotion to her and the early father had a devotion to her and they learned from the apostles.so then here is the question. How does Mary get the titles that you give her today?
and so do you... not reading past the first line CJ...I think what you mean is that your particular singular denomination so interprets it's own history.
No, there is no objective evidence that the Catholic Church even existed in 33 AD (or even 233 AD). Certainly, many beliefs now exposed by the RCC did (pretty much the same ones found in my denomination) but there's ZERO objective evidence that the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception, Perpetual Virginity of Mary, Assumption of Mary, Infallibility of the Roman Pontiff, Aristotle's "accident" explaination for the bread and wine the in Holy Eucharist, etc. were universally taught in 33 AD, and more to the point, that there was the Catholic Denomination in 33 AD. You can claim that. Anyone can claim anything they want (if their ego so permits) but that's not the standard you presented for my full Protestant sister - what you demanded was objective evidence. That, my equal sister, is a whole other ballgame entirely. All you've presented for me is a claim, and then noted that a Protestant shouldn't present claims. You want us to accept that what you say is true - period (for reasons as yet made unclear) but no other teacher (person, congregation, denomination) can do as you do. At least, that's how I read the conversation here. "What's good for the goose is good for the gander."
IAA, you have got to finally come to know what the difference is between doctrine, dogma and devotion.
but how do you know you are the one who is reading the bible correctly and we are the one who aren't?Did Jesus not say continue in My word and Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free? Did He lie? I don't think so..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?