- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,352
- 10,607
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Almost everyone on this board would agree with something like "I choose to keep such and such a day holy to God ... other people make different choices and that is fine with me. They should be allowed to choose as they wish". so say we all.
I am one of several people on this board that is constantly trying to oppose the anti-sda posts of the form "you believe we have the mark of the beast because we keep sunday".
We don't believe that and for the sake of full disclosure regarding future scenarios -- I might add - that IF in the future the only thing that happened was Sunday Laws prohibited stores from being open on Sunday enacted world wide, and all the entire world except for Sabbath keeping Christians - keeping Sunday , with everyone happy to support religious liberty - that STILL WOULD NOT BE the "mark of the beast" (given the details in Rev 13.)
In such a future scenario Sabbath keeping Christians would make legal arguments that they would like their own businesses open Sunday or something like that - and that religious liberty should always be upheld ... but nothing more. And we all could get along with such a restriction even if such appeals failed.
We have over 2billion sunday keeping Christians today - and it is not the mark of the beast.
We have many billions more (including over 1 billion Catholics) that use images/idols in some fashion in their worship traditions ... that also is not "the mark of the beast".
Our view of the "mark of the beast" is that it crushes religious liberty to a historic unprecedented degree in the full light of a day where all are aware of the importance of religious liberty, freedom of conscience and the word of God.
John makes it very clear that failure to worship the beast and his image - is death, as we saw here - Feb 3, 20
Rev 13:12 And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.... 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.
Even in the most casual skimming of such a statement one would notice that Christians would be denied religious liberty (in at least some fashion) if put under such a law by government.
I am one of several people on this board that is constantly trying to oppose the anti-sda posts of the form "you believe we have the mark of the beast because we keep sunday".
We don't believe that and for the sake of full disclosure regarding future scenarios -- I might add - that IF in the future the only thing that happened was Sunday Laws prohibited stores from being open on Sunday enacted world wide, and all the entire world except for Sabbath keeping Christians - keeping Sunday , with everyone happy to support religious liberty - that STILL WOULD NOT BE the "mark of the beast" (given the details in Rev 13.)
In such a future scenario Sabbath keeping Christians would make legal arguments that they would like their own businesses open Sunday or something like that - and that religious liberty should always be upheld ... but nothing more. And we all could get along with such a restriction even if such appeals failed.
We have over 2billion sunday keeping Christians today - and it is not the mark of the beast.
We have many billions more (including over 1 billion Catholics) that use images/idols in some fashion in their worship traditions ... that also is not "the mark of the beast".
Our view of the "mark of the beast" is that it crushes religious liberty to a historic unprecedented degree in the full light of a day where all are aware of the importance of religious liberty, freedom of conscience and the word of God.
John makes it very clear that failure to worship the beast and his image - is death, as we saw here - Feb 3, 20
Rev 13:12 And he exercises all the authority of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.... 15 He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed.
Even in the most casual skimming of such a statement one would notice that Christians would be denied religious liberty (in at least some fashion) if put under such a law by government.
Last edited: